Literature DB >> 31419508

An in vitro depth of injury prediction model for a histopathologic classification of EPA and GHS eye irritants.

Stewart Lebrun1, Yilu Xie2, Sara Chavez3, Roxanne Chan3, James V Jester2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop Globally Harmonized System (GHS) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prediction models for classifying irritant materials based on histopathologic in vitro depth of injury (DoI) measurements. Sixteen different materials were selected, representing all classes of toxicity, according to the GHS and EPA classification systems. Food-source rabbit eyes, similar to eyes used for the widely accepted Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability and Isolated Chicken Eye ocular irritation tests, were used. Tissues were exposed to test material for 1 min, and corneas were collected at 3- and 24-hours post-exposure. Tissues were then fixed and processed for live/dead biomarker fluorescent staining using phalloidin. DoI was then measured, and the percent DoI values for the epithelium and stroma were compared to the EPA and GHS classifications. Excluding surfactants, EPA nonclassified (category IV) materials showed no stromal and very slight epithelial damage (≤10%) to the cornea, whereas EPA corrosive (category I) materials showed significantly greater damage (P < 0.001), ranging from 39% to 100% of the stromal depth. Importantly, EPA reversible (categories II and III) materials showed significant damage to the epithelium (>10%, P < 0.005) but significantly less severe damage to the corneal stroma (P < 0.001), ranging from 1% to 38% of the stromal depth. GHS nonclassified (category NC) irritants caused damage to the epithelium but not to the stroma. All GHS class 2 materials showed damage to the stroma (1-11%), whereas GHS corrosives caused significantly greater damage to the stroma (38-100%; P < 0.001). Additionally, one corrosive material, which produced a stromal DoI of 99% at 24 h, produced no apparent damage at 3-hours post-exposure. Based on these findings, histopathologic EPA and GHS prediction models are proposed that appear to separate and identify reversible irritants from other irritant classes. Furthermore, GHS classification appears to require stromal damage, whereas NC materials may or may not damage the corneal epithelium.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Depth of injury; EPA; GHS; In vitro eye irritation tests; Isolated rabbit eye; Ocular irritation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31419508      PMCID: PMC6922541          DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  20 in total

1.  [The ZEBET database on alternative methods to animal experiments in the Internet--a concrete contribution to the protection of animals].

Authors:  B Grune; S Herrmann; A Dörendahl; S Skolik; S Behnck-Knoblau; R Box; H Spielmann
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  Comparison of corneal epithelial wound healing rates in scrape vs. lamellar keratectomy injury.

Authors:  J P Essepian; F Wei; J Hildesheim; J V Jester
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Optimizing evaluation of Lissamine Green parameters for ocular surface staining.

Authors:  P Hamrah; F Alipour; S Jiang; J-H Sohn; G N Foulks
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Alternatives to the use of animals in household product and cosmetic testing.

Authors:  L H Bruner
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Repeated exposure to benzalkonium chloride in the Ex Vivo Eye Irritation Test (EVEIT): observation of isolated corneal damage and healing.

Authors:  Markus Frentz; Miriam Goss; Martin Reim; Norbert F Schrage
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests.

Authors:  C S Weil; R A Scala
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  The future of animals in research and training. The search for alternatives.

Authors:  A N Rowan
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-08

Review 8.  An overview of current techniques for ocular toxicity testing.

Authors:  Samantha L Wilson; Mark Ahearne; Andrew Hopkinson
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay.

Authors:  P Gautheron; J Giroux; M Cottin; L Audegond; A Morilla; L Mayordomo-Blanco; A Tortajada; G Haynes; J A Vericat; R Pirovano; E Gillio Tos; C Hagemann; P Vanparys; G Deknudt; G Jacobs; M Prinsen; S Kalweit; H Spielmann
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).

Authors:  João Barroso; Uwe Pfannenbecker; Els Adriaens; Nathalie Alépée; Magalie Cluzel; Ann De Smedt; Jalila Hibatallah; Martina Klaric; Karsten R Mewes; Marion Millet; Marie Templier; Pauline McNamee
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.153

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  In vitro reconstructed 3D corneal tissue models for ocular toxicology and ophthalmic drug development.

Authors:  Yulia Kaluzhny; Mitchell Klausner
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Same-chemical comparison of nonanimal eye irritation test methods: Bovine corneal opacity and permeability, EpiOcular™, isolated chicken eye, ocular Irritection®, OptiSafe™, and short time exposure.

Authors:  Stewart Lebrun; Linda Nguyen; Sara Chavez; Roxanne Chan; Debby Le; Minh Nguyen; James V Jester
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Enhanced Transepithelial Riboflavin Delivery Using Femtosecond Laser-Machined Epithelial Microchannels.

Authors:  Samantha Bradford; Eric Mikula; Yilu Xie; Tibor Juhasz; Donald J Brown; James V Jester
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Modeling the antioxidant properties of the eye reduces the false-positive rate of a nonanimal eye irritation test (OptiSafe).

Authors:  Stewart J Lebrun; Sara Chavez; Roxanne Chan; Linda Nguyen; James V Jester
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.685

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.