OBJECTIVES: To perform a three-dimensional evaluation of the position of the condyles in patients treated with Herbst appliance (HA) in two stages of cervical vertebral maturation. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Retrospective case-control study. Pubertal Herbst group (PHG; n = 24, mean age 14.5 years, CS 3 and CS 4) and pre-pubertal Herbst group (PPHG; n = 17, mean age 9.9 years, CS 1 and CS 2) were contrasted with comparison groups of non-orthopaedically treated Class II patients in pubertal (PCG; n = 17, mean age 13.9 years) and pre-pubertal maturational stages (PPCG; n = 18, mean age 10.6 years). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computer tomography scans were taken before treatment (T0) and at T1 after 8 to 12 months. Point-to-point measurements of the displacement of the condyles between T0 and T1, relative to the glenoid fossae, were performed in the X, Y, Z and 3D perspectives. Qualitative assessments using semi-transparent overlays and colour mapping also were produced. RESULTS: The displacement of the condyles within the glenoid fossae in the treated groups was small (<0.75 mm; P > .05). Relative to the glenoid fossa, condylar position at T1 was similar to T0 in pre-pubertal and pubertal groups (P > .05). Similar condylar rotations from T0 to T1 were observed in Herbst and comparison groups, and no significant difference was found between pre-pubertal and pubertal patients. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless the stage of skeletal maturation, HA treatment did not change the condyle-glenoid fossa relationship.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a three-dimensional evaluation of the position of the condyles in patients treated with Herbst appliance (HA) in two stages of cervical vertebral maturation. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Retrospective case-control study. Pubertal Herbst group (PHG; n = 24, mean age 14.5 years, CS 3 and CS 4) and pre-pubertal Herbst group (PPHG; n = 17, mean age 9.9 years, CS 1 and CS 2) were contrasted with comparison groups of non-orthopaedically treated Class II patients in pubertal (PCG; n = 17, mean age 13.9 years) and pre-pubertal maturational stages (PPCG; n = 18, mean age 10.6 years). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computer tomography scans were taken before treatment (T0) and at T1 after 8 to 12 months. Point-to-point measurements of the displacement of the condyles between T0 and T1, relative to the glenoid fossae, were performed in the X, Y, Z and 3D perspectives. Qualitative assessments using semi-transparent overlays and colour mapping also were produced. RESULTS: The displacement of the condyles within the glenoid fossae in the treated groups was small (<0.75 mm; P > .05). Relative to the glenoid fossa, condylar position at T1 was similar to T0 in pre-pubertal and pubertal groups (P > .05). Similar condylar rotations from T0 to T1 were observed in Herbst and comparison groups, and no significant difference was found between pre-pubertal and pubertal patients. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless the stage of skeletal maturation, HA treatment did not change the condyle-glenoid fossa relationship.
Authors: Amalia Cong; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Sandra Khong Tai; Charlene Tai Loh; Mary Barkley; Marilia Yatabe; Marco Caminiti; Camila Massaro; Jonas Bianchi; Romain Deleat-Besson; Celia Le; Juan Carlos Prieto; Najla N Al Turkestani; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 2.711