Literature DB >> 31419040

Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations - a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers.

Federica Cipriani1,2, Mohammad Alzoubi1, David Fuks3, Francesca Ratti2, Takayuki Kawai4, Giammauro Berardi5, Leonid Barkhatov6, Panagiotis Lainas7, Marcel Van der Poel8, Morad Faoury1, Marc G Besselink8, Mathieu D'Hondt9, Ibrahim Dagher7, Bjorn Edwin6, Roberto Ivan Troisi5, Olivier Scatton4, Brice Gayet3, Luca Aldrighetti2, Mohammad Abu Hilal1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A stronger evidence level is needed to confirm the benefits and limits of laparoscopic hemihepatectomies.
METHODS: Laparoscopic and open hemihepatectomies from nine European referral centers were compared after propensity score matching (right and left hemihepatectomies separately, and benign and malignant diseases sub-analyses).
RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-five laparoscopic hemihepatectomies were compared with 545 open. Laparoscopy was associated with reduced blood loss (P < 0.001), postoperative stay (P < 0.001) and minor morbidity (P = 0.002), supported by a lower Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) (P = 0.035). Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomies were associated with lower ascites (P = 0.016), bile leak (P = 0.001) and wound infections (P = 0.009). Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomies exhibited a lower incidence of bile leak and cardiovascular complications (P = 0.024; P = 0.041), lower minor and major morbidity (P = 0.003; P = 0.044) and reduced CCI (P = 0.002). Laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LMH) for benign disease were associated with lower blood loss (P = 0.001) and bile leaks (P = 0.037) and shorter total stay (P < 0.001). LMH for malignancy were associated with lower blood loss (P < 0.001) and minor morbidity (P = 0.027) supported by a lower CCI (P = 0.021) and shorter stay (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This multicenter study confirms some associated advantages of laparoscopic left and right hemihepatectomies in malignant and benign conditions highlighting the need for realistic expectations of the minimally invasive approach based on the resected hemiliver and the patients treated.
© 2019 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemihepatectomy; Laparoscopic liver resection; Laparoscopic major hepatectomy; Left hepatectomy; Right hepatectomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31419040     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  8 in total

1.  Have we really understood when the efforts of laparoscopic liver resection are justified?-a complexity-based appraisal of the differential benefit.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Guido Fiorentini; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.265

2.  Bile leak incidence, risk factors and associated outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a contemporary NSQIP propensity matched analysis.

Authors:  Charles C Vining; Kristine Kuchta; Amr I Al Abbas; Phillip J Hsu; Pierce Paterakos; Darryl Schuitevoerder; Divya Sood; Kevin K Roggin; Mark S Talamonti; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Minimally Invasive vs Open Major Hepatectomies for Liver Malignancies: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Ken Min Chin; Yun-Le Linn; Chin Kai Cheong; Ye-Xin Koh; Jin-Yao Teo; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?

Authors:  Emre Bozkurt; Jasper P Sijberden; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Generic surgical process model for minimally invasive liver treatment methods.

Authors:  Maryam Gholinejad; Egidius Pelanis; Davit Aghayan; Åsmund Avdem Fretland; Bjørn Edwin; Turkan Terkivatan; Ole Jakob Elle; Arjo J Loeve; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a 1:1 matched analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Wang; Jing Fang; Liumei Lin; Long Pan; Junjie Nan; Xinhua Cui; Hui Liu; Mingyu Chen; Qiuxia Gu; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

7.  Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Vinícius Campos Duarte; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Alain Valverde; Divia Danoussou; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Kevin Zuber; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Paulo Herman; Renato Micelli Lupinacci
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION FOR BENIGN TUMORS: THE CURRENT POSITION.

Authors:  Paulo Herman; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.