Literature DB >> 31418459

Environment changes epistasis to alter trade-offs along alternative evolutionary paths.

Anne E Hall1,2, Kedar Karkare3, Vaughn S Cooper4, Claudia Bank5, Tim F Cooper3, Francisco B-G Moore1.   

Abstract

The fitness effect of a mutation can depend on both its genetic background, known as epistasis, and the prevailing external environment. Many examples of these dependencies are known, but few studies consider both aspects in combination, especially as they affect mutations that have been selected together. We examine interactions between five coevolved mutations in eight diverse environments. We find that mutations are, on average, beneficial across environments, but that there is high variation in their fitness effects, including many examples of mutations conferring a cost in some, but not other, genetic background-environment combinations. Indeed, even when global interaction trends are accounted for, specific local mutation interactions are common and differed across environments. One consequence of this dependence is that the range of trade-offs in genotype fitness across selected and alternative environments are contingent on the particular evolutionary path followed over the mutation landscape. Finally, although specific interactions were common, there was a consistent pattern of diminishing returns epistasis whereby mutation effects were less beneficial when added to genotypes of higher fitness. Our results underline that specific mutation effects are highly dependent on the combination of genetic and external environments, and support a general relationship between a genotype's current fitness and its potential to increase in fitness.
© 2019 The Author(s). Evolution © 2019 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adaptation; epistasis; fitness landscape; genotype-by-environment interaction; trade-offs

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31418459     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Extreme Antagonism Arising from Gene-Environment Interactions.

Authors:  Thomas P Wytock; Manjing Zhang; Adrian Jinich; Aretha Fiebig; Sean Crosson; Adilson E Motter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mutational robustness changes during long-term adaptation in laboratory budding yeast populations.

Authors:  Milo S Johnson; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Evolution of resistance under alternative models of selective interference.

Authors:  Philip G Madgwick; Ricardo Kanitz
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.516

4.  The genetic architecture underlying prey-dependent performance in a microbial predator.

Authors:  Balint Stewart; Nicole Gruenheit; Amy Baldwin; Rex Chisholm; Daniel Rozen; Adrian Harwood; Jason B Wolf; Christopher R L Thompson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Fitness of evolving bacterial populations is contingent on deep and shallow history but only shallow history creates predictable patterns.

Authors:  Chelsea E Smith; Adam N H Smith; Tim F Cooper; Francisco B-G Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  The somatic molecular evolution of cancer: Mutation, selection, and epistasis.

Authors:  Krishna Dasari; Jason A Somarelli; Sudhir Kumar; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.799

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.