Literature DB >> 31417904

Commentary: Immunogenic Cell Death and Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma.

Ken Maes1, Karine Breckpot2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  immunogenic cell death; immunogenicity; immunotherapy; multiple myeloma; tolerance

Year:  2019        PMID: 31417904      PMCID: PMC6684735          DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 2296-634X


× No keyword cloud information.
In April 2019, Serrano-del Valle and colleagues summarized the current applications of immunotherapy in the plasma cell malignancy multiple myeloma (MM) (Serrano-Del Valle et al., 2019). The authors moreover highlighted the connection of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the occurrence of immunogenic cell death (ICD). ICD is able to provoke potent adaptive immune responses and is based on the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in a spatiotemporal manner (Garg et al., 2015). Interestingly, ER-stress pathways are important for DAMP exposure, including ecto-calreticulin, HMGB1, and ATP (Serrano-Del Valle et al., 2019). MM cells display enhanced ER-stress, hence making them dependent on ER-stress-related survival pathways. Compounds that target these survival pathways or that induce excessive amounts of ER-stress are very effective in targeting MM cells. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that ICD is an important mode of action of standard-of-care treatment. To assess the occurrence of ICD in vivo, a vaccination assay can be performed in which dying tumor cells are used as a vaccine in mice (Kepp et al., 2014). In case bona fide ICD occurs, mice will be protected against a challenge with living tumor cells. We were the first to perform this vaccination assay using the syngeneic immunocompetent 5T33MM model (De Beck et al., 2018). The vaccine consisted of 5T33vt cells treated with bortezomib, melphalan, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (decitabine), a histone deacetylase inhibitor (quisinostat) or the combination of decitabine and quisinostat. We also used a well-known chemotherapeutic compound that induces ICD in solid cancers, i.e., mitoxantrone (Emeagi et al., 2012; Bezu et al., 2015). None of these treatments gave rise to a vaccine that provided 100% protection against MM outgrowth upon a subsequent challenge with living MM cells. This indicates that ICD did not occur in this model. When looking at the concept of ICD, it is important to note that bona fide ICD can only occur when tumor cells can expose the necessary DAMPs in response to treatment and when the recruited immune cells are not compromised in their function. However, when tumor cells cannot present all DAMPs, express tolerogenic molecules, or when immune cells cannot react properly on the DAMPs, ICD becomes inefficient resulting in tolerogenic cell death (TCD) (Garg et al., 2016). The occurrence of ICD in MM is influenced by the balance of tolerogenic and immunogenic molecules and the associated receptors which are expressed by tumor and immune cells in the bone marrow (BM). In our study, we addressed DAMP exposure in 5T33vt cells. We showed that ecto-calreticulin was present on a low amount of treated pre-apoptotic cells and that the “don't eat me signal” CD47 was highly expressed at basal and treatment conditions. None of the compounds increased the release of HMGB1. Decitabine, quisinostat, and melphalan induced a type I interferon response and induced signs of dendritic cell (DC) maturation upon co-culture of treated 5T33vt cells with BM monocyte-derived DCs. In vivo, epigenetic-modulating compounds increased ecto-calreticulin and decreased CD47 expression in tumor cells, increased DC maturation, reduced CD11b-positive myeloid cells and transiently increased the amount of memory and naive T cells in the BM. Unfortunately, we could not unambiguously show that ICD occurred in the 5T33MM model as the vaccination assay did not provide 100% protection. Other studies also focused on potential ICD effects as a mode-of-action of standard-of-care compounds for MM patients and other compounds in pre-clinical studies (Table 1). Bortezomib induced an adaptive immune response in vitro with U266 and patient-derived MM cells in a HSP90 dependent manner (Spisek et al., 2007; Moeller et al., 2012). Carfilzomib treatment exposed calreticulin in 7-AAD-negative human myeloma cells (Jarauta et al., 2016). Alkylating agents, including melphalan and cyclophosphamide, induced hallmarks of ICD including ecto-calreticulin and HMGB1 in thymoma, lymphoma, and colorectal cancer models (Schiavoni et al., 2011; Dudek-Perić et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2015). Other immune-related effects were also described, including depletion of regulatory T cells, induction of type I interferon, and increased effectiveness in conjunction with adoptive T cell transfer (Condomines et al., 2010; Sharabi and Haran-Ghera, 2011; Moschella et al., 2013). In MM, melphalan induced exosome release and Natural-Killer cell cytokine production in an HSP70-dependent manner (Vulpis et al., 2017). The fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) increased ecto-calreticulin and HMGB1 release (D'Eliseo et al., 2017). Moreover, DHA-treated cells stimulated signs of maturation of ex vivo-generated DCs. The combination of a miR34 mimic and a gamma-secretase inhibitor induced exposure of calreticulin in MM cell lines (Zarone et al., 2017). At last, the IAP antagonist LC161 increased phagocytosis and induced a type I interferon response and long-lasting anti-MM immunity, independently of the presence of ecto-calreticulin (Chesi et al., 2016).
Table 1

Current evidence of ICD hallmarks exposed by multiple myeloma cells.

ReferencesCompoundCompound classICD-hallmarkStageMM modelSpecies
Spisek et al., 2007; Moeller et al., 2012BortezomibProteasome inhibitorHSP90Early/Mid-apoptoticCell line (U266)Human
Primary MM cellsHuman
Chesi et al., 2016LC161IAP antagonistType I IFNN.D.Cell line (Vk14451)Mouse
Primary MM cellsHuman
Jarauta et al., 2016Bortezomib and carfilzomibProteasome inhibitorEcto-CalreticulinEarly/Mid-apoptoticCell lines (U266, NCI-H929, and MM.1S)Human
Vulpis et al., 2017MelphalanAlkylating agentHSP70 on exosomesN.D.Cell lines (SKO-007 and ARK)Human
D'Eliseo et al., 2017Docosahexaenoic acidFatty AcidHSP90Early/Mid-apoptoticCell lines (OPM2 and RPMI8226)Human
Ecto-CalreticulinCell lines (OPM2 and RPMI8226)Human
HMGB1Late-apoptoticCell lines (OPM2 and RPMI8226)Human
Zarone et al., 2017miR34a mimic and gamma-secretase inhibitormiRNA mimetic and NOTCH modulatorEcto-CalreticulinN.D.Cell line (RPMI-8226)Human
De Beck et al., 2018MelphalanAlkylating agentType I IFNN.D.Cell line (5T33vt)Mouse
Ecto-CalreticulinPre-apoptoticCell line (5T33vt)Mouse
Decitabine, QuisinostatEpigenetic-modulating compoundType I IFNN.D.Cell line (5T33vt)Mouse
Ecto-CalreticulinPre-apoptoticCell line (5T33vt)Mouse
BortezomibProteasome inhibitorEcto-CalreticulinPre-apoptoticCell line (5T33vt)Mouse
MitoxanthroneType II topoisomerase inhibitorEcto-CalreticulinPre-apoptoticCell line (5T33vt)Mouse

N.D, not determined.

Current evidence of ICD hallmarks exposed by multiple myeloma cells. N.D, not determined. Despite these studies, progress on identifying hallmarks of ICD is limited and the ICD-inducing capacities of MM cells needs to be better defined. The question thus arises whether standard-of-care agents in MM evoke strong anti-MM responses, especially because in MM, there is an inverse correlation between clinical outcome and mutational load, a parameter that at least in solid cancers is indicative for the success of many immunotherapies (Miller et al., 2017; Vitale et al., 2019). Furthermore, monocytes from MM patients show reduced efferocytosis (Liang et al., 2018). Monocyte-derived DCs from MM patients are ineffective in priming potent immune responses and plasmacytoid DCs have a pro-tumor phenotype by dampening T-cell responses rather than stimulating them (Bi et al., 2018; Shinde et al., 2018). Therefore, detailed examination of all molecular hallmarks of ICD and tolerogenic molecules on MM and immune cells in response to (combinations of) proteasome inhibitors, alkylating agents, immunomodulatory agents, dexamethasone, and monoclonal antibodies is warranted. This should be correlated to underlying stress responses (ER-stress and autophagy) or genetic alterations in a larger number of human MM cell lines, immunocompetent murine models and MM patient tumor and immune cells to obtain the broader picture of ICD and TCD. This is important as a misbalance between ICD and TCD toward TCD blunts therapy-induced immune priming and antitumor immune responses resulting in a worse outcome for patients.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  25 in total

1.  Alkylating agent melphalan augments the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy using tumor-specific CD4+ T cells.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Lu; Zhi-Chun Ding; Yang Cao; Chufeng Liu; Tsadik Habtetsion; Miao Yu; Henrique Lemos; Huda Salman; Hongyan Xu; Andrew L Mellor; Gang Zhou
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Cyclophosphamide synergizes with type I interferons through systemic dendritic cell reactivation and induction of immunogenic tumor apoptosis.

Authors:  Giovanna Schiavoni; Antonella Sistigu; Mara Valentini; Fabrizio Mattei; Paola Sestili; Francesca Spadaro; Massimo Sanchez; Silvia Lorenzi; Maria Teresa D'Urso; Filippo Belardelli; Lucia Gabriele; Enrico Proietti; Laura Bracci
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Bortezomib enhances dendritic cell (DC)-mediated induction of immunity to human myeloma via exposure of cell surface heat shock protein 90 on dying tumor cells: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Radek Spisek; Anna Charalambous; Amitabha Mazumder; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Madhav V Dhodapkar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Antitumor immunity triggered by melphalan is potentiated by melanoma cell surface-associated calreticulin.

Authors:  Aleksandra M Dudek-Perić; Gabriela B Ferreira; Angelika Muchowicz; Jasper Wouters; Nicole Prada; Shaun Martin; Santeri Kiviluoto; Magdalena Winiarska; Louis Boon; Chantal Mathieu; Joost van den Oord; Marguerite Stas; Marie-Lise Gougeon; Jakub Golab; Abhishek D Garg; Patrizia Agostinis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Increased plasma-immune cytokines throughout the high-dose melphalan-induced lymphodepletion in patients with multiple myeloma: a window for adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  Maud Condomines; Jean-Luc Veyrune; Marion Larroque; Philippe Quittet; Pascal Latry; Cécile Lugagne; Catherine Hertogh; Tarik Kanouni; Jean-François Rossi; Bernard Klein
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Cyclophosphamide induces a type I interferon-associated sterile inflammatory response signature in cancer patients' blood cells: implications for cancer chemoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Federica Moschella; Giovanni Fernando Torelli; Mara Valentini; Francesca Urbani; Carla Buccione; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Fiammetta Natalino; Filippo Belardelli; Robin Foà; Enrico Proietti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Uptake routes of tumor-antigen MAGE-A3 by dendritic cells determine priming of naïve T-cell subtypes.

Authors:  Ines Moeller; Giulio C Spagnoli; Jürgen Finke; Hendrik Veelken; Leonora Houet
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 6.968

8.  Proinflammatory characteristics of SMAC/DIABLO-induced cell death in antitumor therapy.

Authors:  Perpetua U Emeagi; Sandra Van Lint; Cleo Goyvaerts; Sarah Maenhout; Anje Cauwels; Iain A McNeish; Tomas Bos; Carlo Heirman; Kris Thielemans; Joeri L Aerts; Karine Breckpot
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death.

Authors:  Oliver Kepp; Laura Senovilla; Ilio Vitale; Erika Vacchelli; Sandy Adjemian; Patrizia Agostinis; Lionel Apetoh; Fernando Aranda; Vincenzo Barnaba; Norma Bloy; Laura Bracci; Karine Breckpot; David Brough; Aitziber Buqué; Maria G Castro; Mara Cirone; Maria I Colombo; Isabelle Cremer; Sandra Demaria; Luciana Dini; Aristides G Eliopoulos; Alberto Faggioni; Silvia C Formenti; Jitka Fučíková; Lucia Gabriele; Udo S Gaipl; Jérôme Galon; Abhishek Garg; François Ghiringhelli; Nathalia A Giese; Zong Sheng Guo; Akseli Hemminki; Martin Herrmann; James W Hodge; Stefan Holdenrieder; Jamie Honeychurch; Hong-Min Hu; Xing Huang; Tim M Illidge; Koji Kono; Mladen Korbelik; Dmitri V Krysko; Sherene Loi; Pedro R Lowenstein; Enrico Lugli; Yuting Ma; Frank Madeo; Angelo A Manfredi; Isabelle Martins; Domenico Mavilio; Laurie Menger; Nicolò Merendino; Michael Michaud; Gregoire Mignot; Karen L Mossman; Gabriele Multhoff; Rudolf Oehler; Fabio Palombo; Theocharis Panaretakis; Jonathan Pol; Enrico Proietti; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Chiara Riganti; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Anna Rubartelli; Antonella Sistigu; Mark J Smyth; Juergen Sonnemann; Radek Spisek; John Stagg; Abdul Qader Sukkurwala; Eric Tartour; Andrew Thorburn; Stephen H Thorne; Peter Vandenabeele; Francesca Velotti; Samuel T Workenhe; Haining Yang; Wei-Xing Zong; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Immune recovery after cyclophosphamide treatment in multiple myeloma: implication for maintenance immunotherapy.

Authors:  Amir Sharabi; Nechama Haran-Ghera
Journal:  Bone Marrow Res       Date:  2011-04-06
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Beyond DNA Damage: Exploring the Immunomodulatory Effects of Cyclophosphamide in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Dawn Swan; Mark Gurney; Janusz Krawczyk; Aideen E Ryan; Michael O'Dwyer
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 2.  Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Emma Verheye; Jesús Bravo Melgar; Sofie Deschoemaeker; Geert Raes; Anke Maes; Elke De Bruyne; Eline Menu; Karin Vanderkerken; Damya Laoui; Kim De Veirman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.