Literature DB >> 31417124

Impacts of Long-term Fertilization on the Molecular Structure of Humic Acid and Organic Carbon Content in Soil Aggregates in Black Soil.

Jiuming Zhang1, Fengqin Chi1, Dan Wei2, Baoku Zhou1, Shanshan Cai1, Yan Li3, Enjun Kuang1, Lei Sun1, Lu-Jun Li4.   

Abstract

Soil aggregates are the basic units of soil structure, and their composition and class="Chemical">carbon (C) stability directly affect soil fertility. As cementing agents, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">humic substances play an important role in the formation and stability of soil aggregates. Long-term fertilization not only changes the structure of humic acid (HA), but also affects the content and stability of organic C in soil aggregates. In this study, based on a long-term fertilization experiment, the relationship between the molecular structure of HA and the stability of organic C in the aggregates was examined. Compared with the non-fertilization control (CK), both the application of organic manure alone (M) and organic manure combined with inorganic fertilizer application (MNPK) increased organic C content in the bulk soil and in HA. In addition, the application of organic manure (M, MNPK) favored the formation of macroaggregates (>0.25 mm) and showed a higher organic C contents of soil aggregates with different sizes than the CK. Moreover, the content of aliphatic C, the ratios of aliphatic C/aromatic C and alkyl C/O-alkyl C was increased with the application of organic fertilizer. A significant negative correlation was observed between aromatic C and organic C content of the aggregates with sizes of >2 mm, 2-0.25 mm, and 0.25-0.053 mm (P < 0.05). The findings indicated that organic fertilization treatments (M and MNPK) increased the aliphatic C content of HA, which favored the increase in the organic C content and stability of the aggregates.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31417124      PMCID: PMC6695396          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48406-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Soil aggregates are the structural units of soils formed by agglomeration and cementation of soil particles. Their quality and quantity not only affect soil fertility, but also maintain soil organic matter (SOM), and are important in class="Chemical">carbon (C) sequestration. class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Humic substances (HS) are the cementing agents forming stable aggregates and are also the main substances involved in C sequestration[1]. The persistence of HS is reliant on being confined within the aggregates[2]. Once the aggregates are destroyed, HS will be exposed and decomposed by microorganisms[3]. Humic substances can maintain the stability of soil aggregates, and the interaction between HS and soil aggregates directly determines soil C sequestration[4]. However, the relations between HS and soil aggregates are poorly understood. Many studies class="Chemical">have suggested tclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">hat microaggregates, especially those in the macroaggregates, play an important role in the formation and protection of C[5-7]. The organic matter in large aggregates mainly plays a role in physical protection, and is mostly derived from plant residues and sensitive to the management measures, with a short cycle[7]. The macroaggregates contain more C than the microaggregates[8]. The organic matter in small aggregates plays a major role in chemical protection and decomposes slowly, which is beneficial for long-term preservation[9,10]. Tisdall et al.[11] indicated that macroaggregates (>0.25 mm) were mainly formed by the cementation of soil roots and hyphae, whereas microaggregates (<0.25 mm) were mainly formed by polyvalent cationic bridges and polysaccharides. The stability of soil aggregates is affected by soil physical structure and SOM, which in turn, is beneficial to the formation and stability of soil structure[12]. Studies have shown that the aliphatic C in the SOM is an important component of the stable soil C pool and thus plays an important role in C stability[13]. The aliphatic components in SOM are mainly fat, wax, and resin, have a major impact on the decomposition of SOM, and thus affect the release of nutrients and plant growth. Alkanes and fatty acids are a special recalcitrant material in soil C pool[14]. The hydrophobicity of aliphatic compounds is important for the stability of organic matter and aggregates[15]. As an active component of soil HS, humic acid (HA) plays a critical role in soil fertility and nutrient supply capacity. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the HA-C components and the change in the organic C content of the aggregates under different fertilizations. As SOM is a continuum of progressively decomposing class="Chemical">organic comclass="Chemical">pounds[16], SOM stability as an ecosystem class="Chemical">proclass="Chemical">perty was class="Chemical">predominantly declass="Chemical">pendent on environment rather tclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">han molecular structure alone or physical recalcitrance[17]. To explore the controls of chemical or physical properties on SOM stability, a long-term (32 years) fertilization experiment with the same environment background was selected from the Scientific Observation Station of Heilongjiang Arable Land Conservation and Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. The molecular structure of soil HA under different long-term fertilization treatments on black soil was studied by using 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (13C-NMR). The size composition of soil aggregates was also assessed based on the changes in the composition of soil aggregates and organic C content under different fertilization. The objective of this study was to test the relationship between soil HA-C structure and the stability of organic C in soil aggregates.

Results

Effects of fertilization on the contents of SOC and HA

Compared with CK, the MNclass="Chemical">PK, M, and Nclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PK treatments significantly increased SOC (P < 0.05) by 19.4%, 16.7% and 15.9%, respectively, and the SOC content of the MNPK treatment was significantly higher than those of M and NPK (Fig. 1). Compared with CK and NPK treatments, the content of soil HA-C was significantly increased by the organic fertilizer treatments (MNPK and M) (P < 0.05).
Figure 1

Effects of different fertilization treatments on carbon contents in HA and bulk soil. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Different lowercase letters for each parameter indicate significant difference among different treatments at P < 0.05.

Effects of different fertilization treatments on class="Chemical">carbon contents in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HA and bulk soil. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Different lowercase letters for each parameter indicate significant difference among different treatments at P < 0.05.

Effects of fertilization on soil water-stable aggregate composition and organic C content

soil aggregates in the 2–0.25 mm and 0.25–0.053 mm were the dominant soil aggregate size fractions, and the average contents of these fractions across treatments were 46.5% and 39.6%, respectively (Fig. 2). Compared with CK, organic fertilization treatments (M and MNclass="Chemical">PK) significantly increased the class="Chemical">proclass="Chemical">portions of aggregates in the >2 mm and 2–0.25 mm fractions, and Nclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PK treatment increased the proportions of the aggregates in the 0.25–0.053 mm and <0.053 mm fractions. These results showed that the application of organic manure facilitates the formation of macroaggregates (>0.25 mm).
Figure 2

Percentage of the aggregates of all size fractions in the soil under long-term fertilization. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers.

Percentage of the aggregates of all size fractions in the soil under long-term fertilization. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Generally, the highest class="Chemical">organic C content was found in the 0.25–0.053 mm aggregate size fraction, followed by the >2 mm and 2–0.25 mm fractions, and the lowest class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">organic C content was found in the <0.053 mm fraction (P < 0.05, Table 1). The increase in organic C content of the aggregates with MNPK treatment ranged from 9.8 (<0.053 mm) to 25.4% (0.25–0.053 mm) relative to the CK treatment. The SOC contents of aggregates under M treatment increased by 14.5–29.0% relative to that of the aggregates in CK treatment, and the largest increase was found in the >2 mm aggregate size fraction. The SOC contents of aggregates with different size fractions under NPK treatment increased by 10.8–18.0% relative to that of the aggregates in CK treatment, and the largest increase was also found in the >2 mm aggregate size fraction.
Table 1

Organic carbon contents in soil aggregates of all size fractions (g·kg−1 soil).

TreatmentAggregate size fraction
>2 mm2 mm–0.25 mm0.25 mm–0.053 mm<0.053 mm
CK11.49 ± 0.04 cB11.61 ± 0.03 cB13.46 ± 0.04 cA9.61 ± 0.04 cC
NPK13.56 ± 0.07 bB13.49 ± 0.03 bB15.55 ± 0.05 bA10.65 ± 0.13 bC
M14.82 ± 0.08 aB13.29 ± 0.04 bBC16.46 ± 0.05 abA11.32 ± 0.11 aC
MNPK14.35 ± 0.07 abB13.76 ± 0.08 aB16.88 ± 0.05 aA10.55 ± 0.11 bC

CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among different treatments at P < 0.05. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate significant difference among different aggregate sizes at P < 0.05.

pan class="Chemical">Organic carbon contents in soil aggregates of all size fractions (g·kg−1 soil). CK, no fertilizer treatment; Nclass="Chemical">PK, chemical Nclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among different treatments at P < 0.05. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate significant difference among different aggregate sizes at P < 0.05.

Solid-state 13C NMR Spectra and C distribution of HA

The solid class="Chemical">13C Cclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PMAS NMR spectra of HA could be divided into four main resonance regions: alkyl C region (0–50 ppm), alkoxyl C (50–110 ppm), aromatic C (110–160 ppm), and carbonyl C (160–200 ppm)[18]. In this study, the main absorption peaks in the resonant regions were near 30, 55, 70, 129, and 170 ppm (Fig. 3). The absorption peaks at 30 ppm is usually assigned to the amorphous (CH2)n long chain C, which belongs to the category of alkyl C. The absorptions in the range of 55 to 60 ppm are associated with the Cs in the polypeptide and the methoxy group, and the absorption around 70 ppm is caused by the carbohydrate C[19]. The absorptions in the range of 128 to 132 ppm are mainly designated to the aromatic C with the substitutions of carboxyl group or the carboxyl group and the aromatic group C that is attached to H and is located in the ortho position to the O and N substituted groups. The absorptions of 170–172 ppm correspond to the absorptions of carboxylic acid, ester and amide C[20].
Figure 3

13C CPMAS NMR spectra of soil HA. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers.

class="Chemical">13C Cclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PMAS NMR spectra of soil HA. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Compared with the CK treatment, the class="Chemical">alkyl C contents of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HA in the NPK, M, and MNPK treatments increased by 6.8%, 10.5%, and 14.1%, respectively (Table 2). The alkoxyl C contents were decreased in the NPK and MNPK treatments (Table 2). The aliphatic C (alkyl C + alkoxyl C) contents in the M and MNPK treatments were increased by 5.9% and 1.3%, respectively, relative to CK. The aromatic C contents in the NPK, M, and MNPK treatments decreased by 3.2%, 4.3%, and 5.0%, respectively, relative to CK. The carbonyl C contents in the NPK and MNPK treatments increased relative to CK. The application of organic fertilizers without or with chemical fertilizers (M and MNPK) significantly increased the ratios of aliphatic C/aromatic C and alkyl C/O-alkyl C.
Table 2

Relative ratios of the functional groups with different chemical shifts from the solid state CPMAS13C-NMR spectra of HA in black soil with different fertilization treatments.

TreatmentAlkyl C (%)O-alkyl C (%)Aromatic C (%)Carbonyl C (%)Aliphatic C/ Aromatic CAlkyl C /O-alkyl CHydrophobic C/ Hydrophilic C
CK19.1 ± 0.15d18.4 ± 0.49a44.3 ± 0.45a18.3 ± 0.40b0.84 ± 0.02c1.04 ± 0.03c1.73 ± 0.02a
NPK20.4 ± 0.29c17.0 ± 0.36b42.9 ± 0.92b19.6 ± 0.56a0.87 ± 0.03bc1.20 ± 0.03b1.73 ± 0.07a
M21.1 ± 0.31b18.6 ± 0.55a42.4 ± 0.83b17.8 ± 0.38b0.94 ± 0.01a1.13 ± 0.05b1.74 ± 0.02a
MNPK21.8 ± 0.30a16.2 ± 0.53b42.1 ± 0.60b19.9 ± 0.50a0.90 ± 0.02ab1.34 ± 0.06a1.77 ± 0.05a

CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Aliphatic C/Aromatic C = (Alkyl C + O-alkyl C)/Aromatic C; Hydrophobic C/Hydrophilic C = (Alkyl C + Aromatic C)/(O-alkyl C + Carbonyl C). Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among different treatments at P < 0.05.

Relative ratios of the functional groups with different chemical shifts from the solid state Cclass="Chemical">PMASclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">13C-NMR spectra of HA in black soil with different fertilization treatments. CK, no fertilizer treatment; Nclass="Chemical">PK, chemical Nclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. Aliphatic C/Aromatic C = (Alkyl C + O-alkyl C)/Aromatic C; Hydrophobic C/Hydrophilic C = (Alkyl C + Aromatic C)/(O-alkyl C + Carbonyl C). Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference among different treatments at P < 0.05.

Correlation between HA-C structure and the organic C content in soil aggregates

The aromatic C content class="Chemical">had a significant negative correlation with the aggregates of >2 mm, 2–0.25 mm, and 0.25–0.053 mm (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">P < 0.05; Table 3). The organic C content in the >2 mm aggregate had a significant positive correlation with that in the 2–0.25 mm (P < 0.05) and a significant negative correlation with that of the <0.053 mm aggregate (P < 0.05). The organic C content in the 2–0.25 mm aggregate size fraction had a significant negative correlation with that in the 0.25–0.053 mm aggregate size fraction (P < 0.05).
Table 3

Analysis of the correlation between soil HA-C structural parameters and organic carbon contents in the aggregates.

FactorsAromatic CAliphatic C/Aromatic CAlkyl C/O-alkyl CHydrophobic C/Hydrophilic C>2 mm2–0.25 mm0.25–0.053 mm<0.053 mm
Aliphatic C−0.5020.904−0.0630.1570.6760.2810.5270.768
Aromatic C1−0.823−0.807−0.691−0.967*−0.952*−0.999*−0.826
Aliphatic C/Aromatic C10.3500.423−0.924−0.660.8380.924
Alkyl C/O-alkyl C10.8380.6320.8460.7960.355
Hydrophobic C/Hydrophilic C10.5320.5700.6990.215
>2 mm10.969*−0.927−0.959*
2–0.25 mm1−0.991*−0.857
0.25–0.053 mm10.781

Aliphatic C/Aromatic C = (Alkyl C + O-alkyl C)/Aromatic C; Hydrophobic C/Hydrophilic C = (Alkyl C + Aromatic C)/(O-alkyl C + Carbonyl C). * indicates a significant correlation at a 5% level.

Analysis of the correlation between soil pan class="Chemical">HA-C structural class="Chemical">parameters and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">organic carbon contents in the aggregates. class="Chemical">Aliphatic C/Aromatic C = (class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Alkyl C + O-alkyl C)/Aromatic C; Hydrophobic C/Hydrophilic C = (Alkyl C + Aromatic C)/(O-alkyl C + Carbonyl C). * indicates a significant correlation at a 5% level.

Discussion

Characteristics of the changes in Soil HA molecular structure

The present study showed tclass="Chemical">hat the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HA-C structure in the humus of black soil included waxy substance, carbohydrates, carboxyl-substituted aromatic C, carboxylic acids, amide C, some peptides, and methoxy C. The ratio of aliphatic C to aromatic C is usually considered as an index of the humification degree of HA structure[29]. The higher percentages of aliphatic C relative to aromatic C in HA in the treatments M and MNPK (Table 2) indicated that long-term organic fertilizers simplified the structure of HA and decreased the aromaticity. Alkyl C is derived from plant biopolymers (cutin and wax) and microbial metabolites, and is a stable organic C component that is difficult to degrade. In contrast, alkoxyl C is relatively easily decomposed[21], so the alkyl C/O-alkyl C ratio is usually used as an indicator for the degree of decomposition of organic C[22]. In the current study, the fertilization treatments increased the percentage of alkyl C in HA compared with the CK. The applications of organic manure and inorganic fertilizers allowed more crop residues to enter soils, which likely improved soil microbial activity, and further increased the use of alkoxyl C, causing alkyl C accumulation. In addition, the percentage of alkoxyl C was decreased with the treatment of NPK and MNPK compared to the CK. As a result, the alkyl C/alkoxyl C ratios in all the fertilization treatments were increased relative to the CK, which was beneficial for improving the stability of SOC. The hydrophobic C/hydrophilic C ratio can reflect the degree of hydrophobicity of HS, and is closely related to the stability of the SOC and aggregates. In general, the higher the ratio, the higher the stability of the SOC and the agglomerates. This is because the hydrophobic organic matter containing numerous functional groups, such as –COOH and –OH, can form microaggregates with the charges on the soil mineral surface via hydrogen bonds or polyvalent cation bridges, and the aggregates formed by this cementation have a high stability[22,23]. Giovannini et al.[24] found that hydrophobic organic compounds improved the stability of aggregates and Capriel et al.[25] showed a good correlation between aliphatic organic compounds and the stability of aggregates. The present study showed a slight increasing trend of the hydrophobic C/hydrophilic C ratio in HA with organic fertilization, but there was no statistically significant differences, which deserves further study.

Relationship between Soil HA-C structure and the Organic C in aggregates

Long-term fertilization class="Chemical">has a direct or indirect effect on the formation and stability of soil aggregates, leading to a cclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">hange in the distribution of soil nutrients in aggregates[26]. As an important component of humus, HA is involved in the distribution of organic C in aggregates, and its structural changes will inevitably affect the distributions of organic C in aggregates. Huang et al.[27] suggested that long chain aliphatic C was a stable C structure in soil, and a higher hydrophobic C/hydrophilic C ratio indicated a higher stability of SOC and aggregates. In the present study, the negative correlation between HA aliphatic C and aromatic C, and that between aromatic C and C content in the >2 mm and 2–0.25 mm and 0.25–0.053 mm aggregates (Table 3) indicated that the decrease of aromatic C content and the increase of aliphatic C content in HA increased the organic C in the agglomerates. Therefore, the increase in aliphatic C content in HA with organic fertilization treatment could help to increase the content and stability of organic C in aggregates. The alkyl C/alkoxyl C and hydrophobic C/hydrophilic C ratios had a positive correlation with organic C contents in aggregates of all size fractions, indicating that all the fertilizations could increase the proportion of organic C that was difficult to decompose in the aggregates and improve the stability of soil C. The above results demonstrated that soil HA structure was correlated to the content of organic C in the aggregates. The organic fertilization treatment could significantly increase SOC and HA contents and increase the proportion of macroaggregates (>0.25 mm). Moreover, the content and stability of organic C in microaggregates (<0.25 mm) were increased because of the increase in the aliphatic C content. Since HA is an important component of humus and is involved in the distribution of organic C in the aggregates, the hydrophobicity of the aliphatic C increases the stability of C and allows microaggregates to contain more organic C in the form of chemical protection, thus improving soil structure and increasing soil C pool.

Conclusion

Results indicated tclass="Chemical">hat soil class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HA structure was correlated with organic C content in aggregates. M and MNPK treatments significantly increased SOC and HA content, increased the proportion of macroaggregates (>0.25 mm) and aliphatic C content, and then increased the content and stability of organic C in microaggregates (<0.25 mm). As an important component of humus, soil HA participated in the distribution of organic C in aggregates. The hydrophobicity of aliphatic C in HA improved the stability of C, formed chemical protection for soil microaggregates, and increased the content of organic C in microaggregates, thus improving soil structure and increasing soil C pool.

Methods

Study site and experiment design

The black soil fertility long-term monitoring station (Scientific Observation Station of Heilongjiang Arable Land Conservation and Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture), established in 1979 is located in Guangming village of Minzhu town at class="Chemical">Harbin, Heilongjiang class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Province (E126°51′05″, N45°50′30″, 151 m a.s.l.). The station is on the Songhua River secondary stream terrace. The region has a temperate continental monsoon climate and a ≥ 10 °C annual average effective accumulated temperature of 2700 °C, annual precipitation of 533 mm, and a 135-day frost-free season. The soil was developed from loess-like parent material, with the following soil properties in 1979: 15.5 g kg−1organic C, 1.47 g·kg−1 total nitrogen (N), 1.07 g·kg−1 total phosphorus (P) as P2O5, 25.16 g·kg−1 total potassium (K) as K2O, 151 mg·kg−1 alkaline hydrolyzable N, 51 mg·kg−1 available P, 200 mg·kg−1 available K, and pH of 7.2. The long-term experiment was conducted using a class="Species">wheat (year of 1980)-class="Chemical">pan class="Species">soybean-maize rotation. Four treatments were arranged with completely random design with three replicates. The size of each plot area was 36 m2. The treatments include control (no fertilization, CK), organic manure (M), inorganic N, P, and K fertilizers (NPK), and combined organic manure, inorganic N, P, and K fertilizers (MNPK). The amounts of applied fertilizers in different crop years are shown in Table 4. The organic manure was pure horse manure, collected from the same horse farmers, and applied after the maize was harvested in each rotation at a pure N amount of 75 kg·ha−1 (about 18,600 kg·ha−1 of horse manure). The contents of organic C, N, phosphorus as P2O5, and potassium as K2O in manure were 163.6 g·kg−1, 5.8 g·kg−1, 6.5 g·kg−1, and 9.0 g·kg−1, respectively. The N, P, and K fertilizers were applied in the fall (during maize season, 50% N fertilizer was applied in the fall, and a top dressing of the remaining 50% was performed in the big trumpet period). The N, P, and K fertilizers were urea (N, 46%), tripe superphosphate (P2O5, 46%), and potassium sulfate (K2O, 50%). The detailed information was described by Zhang et al.[28].
Table 4

Long-term fertilization experiment and the amount of applied fertilizers.

TreatmentN (kg·ha−1 y−1)P2O5 (kg·ha−1 y−1)K2O (kg·ha−1 y−1)Horse manure (t·ha−1)
WheatSoybeanMaizeWheatSoybeanMaize
CK00000000
NPK150751507515075750
M000000018.6
MNPK1507515075150757518.6

CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers.

Long-term fertilization experiment and the amount of applied fertilizers. CK, no fertilizer treatment; NPK, chemical NPK fertilizers; M, organic manure treatment; MNPK, treatment of organic manure combined with chemical NPK fertilizers. The tested soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–20 cm after the fall class="Chemical">harvest in 2012 (class="Chemical">pan class="Species">maize) and S-type sampling was adopted, with a total of five sampling sites. After root fragments and stones were removed, a portion of the samples were air-dried and passed a sieve (<2 mm) for further analyses of HA and nutrients.

HA separation and purification

The detailed method of class="Chemical">HA seclass="Chemical">paration and class="Chemical">purification was described by our class="Chemical">previous study[29]. Briefly, 100 g air-dried soils and 1 mol L−1 class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HCl solution were added into a glass bottle at a ratio soil to solution of 1:1. The ratio was adjusted to 1:10 with HCl solution after standing for 1 h. The mixture was then shaken for 1 h and then centrifuged at a speed of 3500 r min−1 for 15 min. After that, the supernatant was discarded and the sediment was adjusted to pH of 7 with 1 mol L−1 NaOH solution. After standing for 1 h, the soil to solution ratio was adjusted to 1:10 by adding 0.1 mol L−1 NaOH solution. Each glass bottle was flushed with N2 for 1 min and then sealed. Under the N2 atmosphere, each bottle was shaken once an hour for 12 h, and then settled overnight. Samples were centrifuged at a low speed, acidified to pH 1.0 with 6 mol L−1 HCl solution, and then settled again for 12–16 h. Following three extractions and low-speed centrifugations, the sediment was HA. The HA precipitant was dissolved in a small amount of 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution under an N2 atmosphere, and then solid KCl was added to achieve a concentration of K+ at 0.3 mol L−1. After 1 h settling and centrifugation at a high speed of 8000 r min−1 for 20 min, the supernatant was adjusted to pH 1.0 with 6 mol L−1 HCl solution, and then settled for 12–16 h. The upper clear solution was discarded. The HA was soaked in 0.1 mol L−1 HCl and 0.3 mol L−1 HF mixed acid to reduce the content of ash to less than 1%. The samples were then placed into an electrodialyzer until no Cl−1 was detected in distilled water by AgNO3. The liquid was concentrated by rotary evaporation and then freeze-dried for later use.

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (CPMAS13C-NMR) analysis

class="Chemical">Humic substances are mainly divided into class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HA, fulvic acid, and humin. As an active component of soil HS, HA was selected to run the NMR analysis in the present study. The solid-state 13C-NMR spectra were collected by nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (BrukerAV400, Swiss). The cross-polarized magic angle spin (CPMAS) technique was adopted, the 13C resonant frequency was 400.18 MHz, and the magic angle was 8 kHz. The contact time was 2 ms, the recycle delay was 3 s, and the number of data points was 3000. The chemical shift was calibrated by external standard 2, 2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate sodium salt, the integral area was automatically given by the instrument, and the relative content of each type of C was expressed by the percentage of an integral area of one chemical shift range over the total integral area.

Determination of aggregate size and organic C content

Aggregates were graded using the wet sieving method. The air-dried soil sample (100 g) was placed on the top layer of the three-stack (2 mm, 0.25 mm, and 0.053 mm) mecclass="Chemical">hanical sieve sclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">haker. After immersion in distilled water for 5 min at room temperature, the sample was shaken at a frequency of 0.5 Hz and an up-down motion amplitude of 3 cm for 2 min. After sieving, the aggregates on each sieve stack were rinsed into the beaker to obtain water-stable aggregates with particle size >2 mm, 2–0.25 mm and 0.25–0.053 mm, and the aggregate <0.053 mm was settled in the barrel for 48 h and then transferred to the beaker after the supernatant was discarded. The aggregates in the beaker were dried and weighed and the percentage of aggregates in each size fraction was calculated[9]. The SOC content was measured using a total organic C analyzer (Multi N/C 2100S, Analytik Jena, Germany).

Statistical analyses

The Cclass="Chemical">PMASclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">13C-NMR spectra were analyzed by MestRe Nova (version 6.0.3, Mestrelabs Research, SL, Santiago de Compostela, Spain). After the source data were extracted and analyzed, Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and Origin 8.0 software were used for data processing and plotting, the data in “Available Data” were plotted by fitted curve stacking method in Origin, and SPSS 17.0 statistical analysis software was used to determine whether there were significant differences between groups (Duncan method) and to conduct correlation analyses.
  1 in total

1.  Response of the chemical structure of soil organic carbon to modes of maize straw return.

Authors:  Shuqing Zheng; Jiuming Zhang; Fengqin Chi; Baoku Zhou; Dan Wei; Enjun Kuang; Yu Jiang; Gang Mi; Yu Ping Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.