| Literature DB >> 31416912 |
Su Bin Lim1,2, Trifanny Yeo2, Wen Di Lee2, Ali Asgar S Bhagat2,3, Swee Jin Tan4, Daniel Shao Weng Tan5,6,7, Wan-Teck Lim5,8,9, Chwee Teck Lim10,2,3,11.
Abstract
Despite pronounced genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not only between tumors, but also within a tumor, validation of clinically relevant gene signatures for prognostication has relied upon single-tissue samples, including 2 commercially available multigene tests (MGTs). Here we report an unanticipated impact of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) on risk prediction of recurrence in NSCLC, underscoring the need for a better genomic strategy to refine prognostication. By leveraging label-free, inertial-focusing microfluidic approaches in retrieving circulating tumor cells (CTCs) at single-cell resolution, we further identified specific gene signatures with distinct expression profiles in CTCs from patients with differing metastatic potential. Notably, a refined prognostic risk model that reconciles the level of ITH and CTC-derived gene expression data outperformed the initial classifier in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS). We propose tailored approaches to providing reliable risk estimates while accounting for ITH-driven variance in NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: circulating biomarkers; microfluidics; tumor heterogeneity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31416912 PMCID: PMC6731691 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907904116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.ITH-driven patient misclassification in lung cancers. (A) Density distribution of TMi in NSCLC (n = 80) and matched normal lung (n = 20) from study 1. (B) ROC curves using the best TMi cutoff value. (C) Gaussian kernel density distribution of TMi in tumor sectors (n = 35) from study 2. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curves using the optimal cutoff value (95% CI = 1.4 to 22.7; log-rank P = 0.00628). (E) TMi distribution and the variance of TMi (σ2). The universal cutoff value and the optimal cutoff value were used for patient stratification in study 1 (Top) and study 2 (Bottom), respectively. Dotted red boxes represent discordant tumor samples with TMilow and TMihigh sectors. Patients are ordered by increasing mean TMi.
Fig. 2.Microfluidic enrichment for single-cell analysis. Inertial focusing, label-free capture of single cancer cells using a microfluidic device (25). (Top) Hydrodynamic focusing of cell flow (A549 lung adenocarcinoma) by sheath flow (glycerol). (Bottom) Bright-field and immunofluorescent images of isolated single A549 cells. (Scale bar, 100 μm.)
Fig. 3.Potential predictors of distant metastasis or recurrence. (A) Heterogeneity in 15-gene matrisome expression (±SD) measured by mean Pearson correlation coefficient (r) across all CTCs detected within the same patient with (blue) or without (red) distant metastases (DM). Each clustered bar (Right) represents the number of analyzed CTCs. The vertical red dashed line represents the mean number of analyzed CTCs. (B and C) Intrapatient variability in matrisome gene expression in (B) liquid biopsies and (C) tumor tissues (***P < 0.001 and **P < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). (D) Heat map comparing expression profiles of selected matrisome genes between DM and non-DM patient groups (***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
Fig. 4.Refined prognostication in NSCLC patients with MMPi. (A) CV of the index in discordant samples previously identified with TMi. Patient IDs and the mean CV for each prognostic index are stated. (B) Gaussian kernel density distribution of MMPi in tumor sectors (n = 35) from study 2. (C) Kaplan–Meier survival curves using the optimal cutoff value (95% CI = 2.0 to 46.8; log-rank P = 0.00062). (D) Violin plot depicting MMPi distribution in datasets probed with the same profiling platform and the universal cutoff value (blue dotted line). (E–G) Kaplan–Meier survival curves using (E) GSE50081 (95% CI = 0.99 to 3.3; log-rank P = 0.049; n = 177), (F) GSE30219 (95% CI = 1.0 to 2.4; log-rank P = 0.0345; n = 278), and (G) GSE31210 (95% CI = 1.3–4.3; log-rank P = 0.00343; n = 226).