Literature DB >> 31416559

Automated pancreas segmentation from computed tomography and magnetic resonance images: A systematic review.

Haribalan Kumar1, Steve V DeSouza2, Maxim S Petrov3.   

Abstract

The pancreas is a highly variable organ, the size, shape, and position of which are affected by age, sex, adiposity, the presence of diseases affecting the pancreas (e.g., diabetes, pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis) and other factors. Accurate automated segmentation of the pancreas has the potential to facilitate timely diagnosing and managing of diseases of the endocrine and exocrine pancreas. The aim was to systematically review studies reporting on automated pancreas segmentation algorithms derived from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images. The MEDLINE database and three patent databases were searched. Data on the performance of algorithms were meta-analysed, when possible. The algorithms were classified into one of four groups: multiorgan atlas-based, landmark-based, shape model-based, and neural network-based. A total of 13 cohorts suitable for meta-analysis were pooled to determine the performance of pancreas segmentation algorithms altogether using the Dice coefficient. These cohorts, comprising 1110 individuals, yielded a weighted mean Dice coefficient of 74.4%. Eight cohorts suitable for meta-analysis were pooled to determine the performance of pancreas segmentation algorithms altogether using the Jaccard index. These cohorts, comprising 636 individuals, yielded a weighted mean Jaccard index of 63.7%. Multiorgan atlas-based algorithms had a weighted mean Dice coefficient of 70.1% and a weighted mean Jaccard index of 59.8%. Neural network-based algorithms had a weighted mean Dice coefficient of 82.3% and a weighted mean Jaccard index of 70.1%. Studies using the other two types of algorithms were not meta-analysable. The above findings indicate that the automation of pancreas segmentation represents a considerable challenge as the performance of current automated pancreas segmentation algorithms is suboptimal. Adopting standardised reporting on performance of pancreas segmentation algorithms and encouraging the use of benchmark pancreas segmentation datasets will allow future algorithms to be tested and compared more easily and fairly.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automation; Pancreas; Segmentation; Systematic review; Volumetry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31416559     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  9 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence: a critical review of current applications in pancreatic imaging.

Authors:  Maxime Barat; Guillaume Chassagnon; Anthony Dohan; Sébastien Gaujoux; Romain Coriat; Christine Hoeffel; Christophe Cassinotto; Philippe Soyer
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  CT and MRI of pancreatic tumors: an update in the era of radiomics.

Authors:  Marion Bartoli; Maxime Barat; Anthony Dohan; Sébastien Gaujoux; Romain Coriat; Christine Hoeffel; Christophe Cassinotto; Guillaume Chassagnon; Philippe Soyer
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Fully Automated Abdominal CT Biomarkers for Type 2 Diabetes Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Ronald M Summers; Hima Tallam; Daniel C Elton; Sungwon Lee; Paul Wakim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 4.  Pancreas image mining: a systematic review of radiomics.

Authors:  Bassam M Abunahel; Beau Pontre; Haribalan Kumar; Maxim S Petrov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Automated pancreas segmentation and volumetry using deep neural network on computed tomography.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Lim; Young Jae Kim; Yeon-Ho Park; Doojin Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Doo-Ho Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Segmentation of Pancreatic Subregions in Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Sehrish Javed; Touseef Ahmad Qureshi; Zengtian Deng; Ashley Wachsman; Yaniv Raphael; Srinivas Gaddam; Yibin Xie; Stephen Jacob Pandol; Debiao Li
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-12

7.  Effect of Gray Value Discretization and Image Filtration on Texture Features of the Pancreas Derived from Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Bassam M Abunahel; Beau Pontre; Maxim S Petrov
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence Applied to Pancreatic Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Maria Elena Laino; Angela Ammirabile; Ludovica Lofino; Lorenzo Mannelli; Francesco Fiz; Marco Francone; Arturo Chiti; Luca Saba; Matteo Agostino Orlandi; Victor Savevski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence and its impact on the domains of universal health coverage, health emergencies and health promotion: An overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Antonio Martinez-Millana; Aida Saez-Saez; Roberto Tornero-Costa; Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat; Vicente Traver; David Novillo-Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.730

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.