| Literature DB >> 31416450 |
Ibrahim Yakubu1,2, Gholamreza Garmaroudi3, Roya Sadeghi3, Azar Tol3, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad4, Adadow Yidana5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent pregnancy is a worldwide problem because of its health, social, economic and political repercussions on the globe. Even though the rates of adolescent pregnancy have declined over the decade, there is still unacceptably high rates especially in lower and middle-income countries including Ghana. Although the problem has been widely investigated, there is little information on the effectiveness of different methods to improve adolescent sexual abstinence based on theoretical models. This study is aimed to assess an educational intervention program on sexual abstinence based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) among adolescent girls in Northern Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent pregnancy; Ghana; Health belief model; Prevention; Sexual Abstinence
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31416450 PMCID: PMC6694566 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0784-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Fig. 1Clustered Randomized Control Trial flow chart based on consort reporting
Study participants Characteristics (N = 363)
| Characteristics | Categories | Combined frequencies | Control ( | Intervention ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Control | 180 (49.6) | ||
| Intervention | 183 (50.4) | |||
| Age (years) | 14–16 | 72 (19.8) | 41 (22.8) | 31 (16.9) |
| 17–19 | 291 (80.2) | 139 (77.2) | 152 (83.1) | |
| Social class | Lower | 239 (65.8 | 122 (67.8) | 117 (63.9) |
| Middle | 116 (32.5) | 54 (30.0) | 64 (35.0) | |
| Upper | 6 (1.7) | 4 (2.2) | 2 (1.1) | |
| Grade | SHS One | 160 (44.1) | 74 (41.1) | 86 (47.0) |
| SHS Two | 119 (32.8) | 67 (37.2) | 52 (28.4) | |
| SHS Three | 84 (23.1) | 39 (21.7) | 45 (24.6) | |
| Ethnicity | Dagombas | 268 (73.5) | 123 (68.3) | 145 (79.2) |
| Gonjas | 31 (8.5) | 23 (12.8) | 8 (4.4) | |
| Ashantis | 13 (3.6) | 7 (3.9) | 6 (3.3) | |
| Others | 51 (14.1) | 27 (15.0) | 24 (13.1) | |
| Religion | Islam | 302 (83.2) | 152 (84.4) | 150 (82.0) |
| Christianity | 61 (16.8) | 28 (15.6) | 33 (18.0) | |
| Birth order | 1–5 | 309 (85.1) | 153 (85.0) | 156 (85.2) |
| 6–10 | 47 (12.9) | 22 (12.2) | 25 (13.70 | |
| Above 10 | 7 (1.9) | 5 (2.8) | 2 (1.1) | |
| Household Members | 10 or less | 204 (56.2) | 96 (53.3) | 108 (59.0) |
| 11–20 | 106 (29.2) | 55 (30.6) | 51 (27.9) | |
| Above 20 | 53 (14.6) | 29 (16.1) | 24 (13.1) |
Fig. 2Abstinence at baseline and endpoint
knowledge, abstinence from sex, intention to abstain from sex and HBM domains mean scores difference between intervention and control groups, adjusted for clusters at endpoint
| Variable | Control ( | Intervention ( | P (ANCOVA) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before mean (SD) | After mean (SD) | Before mean (SD) | After mean (SD) | ||
| Knowledge | 58.17 (10.70) | 62.28 (12.50) | 60.49 (12.89) | 87.58 (5.12) | <0.001 |
| Perceived Susceptibility | 43.92 (23.82) | 42.72 (21.87) | 47.13 (19.76) | 95.71 (5.10) | <0.001 |
| Perceived Severity | 72.71 (23.08) | 74.82 (21.66) | 81.50(18.80) | 95.93 (5.82) | <0.001 |
| Perceived Barriers | 67.89 (19.74) | 67.79 (18.22) | 69.40 (16.88) | 84.23(13.84) | <0.001 |
| Perceived Benefits | 75.28 (21.33) | 77.61 (20.71) | 85.55 (14.87) | 99.67 (1.12) | <0.001 |
| Perceived Self-efficacy | 61.86 (23.59) | 63.54 (24.00) | 75.89 (16.58) | 83.74(14.64) | <0.001 |
| Cues to action | 44.93 (13.52) | 44.86 (13.24) | 43.31 (12.45) | 43.36(12.75) | 0.582 |
| Attitude | 139.42 (30.23) | 141.36 (28.20) | 145.10 (27.87) | 194.12 (9.53) | <0.001 |
| Intention to abstain from sex | 84.44 (23.21) | 93.33 (18.86) | 89.89 (20.13) | 98.45(5.22) | <0.001 |
| Abstinence from sex | 71.35 (27.21) | 74.89(27.94) | 84.42(22.76) | 92.42(11.59) | 0.001 |
Logistic regression model on sexual abstinence practice
| Variable | OR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study group | Controla | 1.00 | 0.003 |
| Intervention | 13.89(2.468–78.188) | ||
| Social class | Low social Classa | 1.00 | 0.901 |
| High | 1.075 (0.347–3.325) | ||
| Age of participants | 1.56 (0.99–2.46) | 0.051 | |
| Perceived Susceptibility | 0.99 (0.99–2.468) | 0.653 | |
| Knowledge | 0.94 (0.90–0.99) | 0.028 | |
| Perceived Severity | 1.03 (1.00–1.06) | 0.034 | |
| Perceived Barriers | 0.98 (0.96–1.01) | 0.384 | |
| Perceived Benefits | 1.02 (0.99–1.05) | 0.172 | |
| Perceived Self-efficacy | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.977 | |
| Cues to action | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.758 | |
| Intention to abstain | 1.04 (1.02–1.06) | <0.001 |
aSet to zero because this parameter is redundant
Intervention strategies for pregnancy prevention based on HBM
| Target variable | Procedure | Practice techniques | Educational strategies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived susceptibility and Perceived severity | General information about behavioural risk, including susceptibility to adolescent pregnancy, the severity of adolescent pregnancy | Provide information on behavioural risk through posters, pamphlets and discussions | Lecturing Discussion |
| Perceived benefits Perceived barriers | Information about the benefits and cost of getting pregnant, focusing on what will happen if a person does or does not get pregnant | Provide information on the significance of not getting pregnant as adolescents | Discussion Brainstorming Lecturing |
| Perceived barriers | Identify barriers to of avoiding pregnancy and ways of overcoming them | Identify barriers to abstinence | Problems based learning Role-playing Discussions |
| Perceived self-efficacy Knowledge of contraception | Information on contraceptives And the demonstration of how to put on condom | Provide instruction and model demonstration | Lecturing Demonstrations Practice |
| Knowledge of reproductive system and reproduction | Information on reproductive organs and their functions | Provide information through posters, pictures and models | Demonstration Lecturing |
| Perceived self-efficacy | Information on decision-making skills. | Encourage decision-making through role-playing and scenarios. | Problem-based learning |