Michael G Nanna1, Tracy Y Wang1, Qun Xiang1, Anne C Goldberg2, Jennifer G Robinson3, Veronique L Roger4, Salim S Virani5, Peter W F Wilson6, Michael J Louie7, Andrew Koren8, Zhuokai Li1, Eric D Peterson1, Ann Marie Navar1. 1. Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.G.N., T.Y.W., Q.X., Z.L., E.D.P., A.M.N.). 2. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (A.C.G.). 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health (J.G.R.). 4. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (V.L.R.). 5. Department of Medicine-Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (S.S.V.). 6. Department of Medicine, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, GA (P.W.F.W.). 7. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY (M.J.L.). 8. Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ (A.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female patients have historically received less aggressive lipid management than male patients. Contemporary care patterns and the potential causes for these differences are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Examining the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry-a nationwide registry of outpatients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-we compared the use of statin therapy, guideline-recommended statin dosing, and reasons for undertreatment. We specifically analyzed sex differences in statin treatment and guideline-recommended statin dosing using multivariable logistic regression. Among 5693 participants (43% women) eligible for 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Guideline-recommended statin treatment, women were less likely than men to be prescribed any statin therapy (67.0% versus 78.4%; P<0.001) or to receive a statin at the guideline-recommended intensity (36.7% versus 45.2%; P<0.001). Women were more likely to report having previously never been offered statin therapy (18.6% versus 13.5%; P<0.001), declined statin therapy (3.6% versus 2.0%; P<0.001), or discontinued their statin (10.9% versus 6.1%; P<0.001). Women were also less likely than men to believe statins were safe (47.9% versus 55.2%; P<0.001) or effective (68.0% versus 73.2%; P<0.001) and more likely to report discontinuing their statin because of a side effect (7.9% versus 3.6%; P<0.001). Sex differences in both overall and guideline-recommended intensity statin use persisted after adjustment for demographics, socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, patient beliefs, and provider characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81; P<0.001; and odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92; P<0.01, respectively). Sex differences were consistent across primary and secondary prevention indications for statin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Women eligible for statin therapy were less likely than men to be treated with any statin or guideline-recommended statin intensity. A combination of women being offered statin therapy less frequently, while declining and discontinuing treatment more frequently, accounted for these sex differences in statin use.
BACKGROUND: Female patients have historically received less aggressive lipid management than male patients. Contemporary care patterns and the potential causes for these differences are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Examining the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry-a nationwide registry of outpatients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-we compared the use of statin therapy, guideline-recommended statin dosing, and reasons for undertreatment. We specifically analyzed sex differences in statin treatment and guideline-recommended statin dosing using multivariable logistic regression. Among 5693 participants (43% women) eligible for 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol Guideline-recommended statin treatment, women were less likely than men to be prescribed any statin therapy (67.0% versus 78.4%; P<0.001) or to receive a statin at the guideline-recommended intensity (36.7% versus 45.2%; P<0.001). Women were more likely to report having previously never been offered statin therapy (18.6% versus 13.5%; P<0.001), declined statin therapy (3.6% versus 2.0%; P<0.001), or discontinued their statin (10.9% versus 6.1%; P<0.001). Women were also less likely than men to believe statins were safe (47.9% versus 55.2%; P<0.001) or effective (68.0% versus 73.2%; P<0.001) and more likely to report discontinuing their statin because of a side effect (7.9% versus 3.6%; P<0.001). Sex differences in both overall and guideline-recommended intensity statin use persisted after adjustment for demographics, socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, patient beliefs, and provider characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81; P<0.001; and odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92; P<0.01, respectively). Sex differences were consistent across primary and secondary prevention indications for statin treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Women eligible for statin therapy were less likely than men to be treated with any statin or guideline-recommended statin intensity. A combination of women being offered statin therapy less frequently, while declining and discontinuing treatment more frequently, accounted for these sex differences in statin use.
Entities:
Keywords:
primary prevention; secondary prevention; sex; sex characteristics; women
Authors: Lori Mosca; Lawrence J Appel; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Rosalind P Fabunmi; Deborah Grady; Constance K Haan; Sharonne N Hayes; Debra R Judelson; Nora L Keenan; Patrick McBride; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Mehmet C Oz; Michael E Mendelsohn; Richard C Pasternak; Vivian W Pinn; Rose Marie Robertson; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Cathy A Sila; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Anne L Taylor; Brian W Walsh; Nanette K Wenger; Christine L Williams Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Wayne Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lori Mosca; Carole L Banka; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Cheryl Bushnell; Rowena J Dolor; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Heather L Gornik; Clarissa Gracia; Martha Gulati; Constance K Haan; Debra R Judelson; Nora Keenan; Ellie Kelepouris; Erin D Michos; L Kristin Newby; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Mehmet C Oz; Diana Petitti; Vivian W Pinn; Rita F Redberg; Rosalyn Scott; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Robin H Steinhorn; Neil J Stone; Kathryn A Taubert; Barbara A Todd; Elaine Urbina; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-02-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sanne A E Peters; Lisandro D Colantonio; Hong Zhao; Vera Bittner; Yuling Dai; Michael E Farkouh; Keri L Monda; Monika M Safford; Paul Muntner; Mark Woodward Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jordan Fulcher; Rachel O'Connell; Merryn Voysey; Jonathan Emberson; Lisa Blackwell; Borislava Mihaylova; John Simes; Rory Collins; Adrienne Kirby; Helen Colhoun; Eugene Braunwald; John La Rosa; T R Pedersen; Andrew Tonkin; Barry Davis; Peter Sleight; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Colin Baigent; Anthony Keech Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel; Aleksandra Jankovic; Holly A Derry; Dylan M Smith Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Ann Marie Navar; Tracy Y Wang; Anne C Goldberg; Jennifer G Robinson; Veronique L Roger; Peter F Wilson; Salim S Virani; Joesph Elassal; L Veronica Lee; Laura E Webb; Eric Peterson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Corey K Bradley; Tracy Y Wang; Shuang Li; Jennifer G Robinson; Veronique L Roger; Anne C Goldberg; Salim S Virani; Michael J Louie; L Veronica Lee; Eric D Peterson; Ann Marie Navar Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: B Mihaylova; J Emberson; L Blackwell; A Keech; J Simes; E H Barnes; M Voysey; A Gray; R Collins; C Baigent Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jalal Uddin; Gargya Malla; Andrea L Cherrington; Sha Zhu; Doyle M Cummings; Olivio J Clay; Todd M Brown; Loretta T Lee; Ruth W Kimokoti; Mary Cushman; Monika M Safford; April P Carson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Adam J Nelson; Kevin Haynes; Sonali Shambhu; Zubin Eapen; Mark J Cziraky; Michael G Nanna; Sara B Calvert; Kerrin Gallagher; Neha J Pagidipati; Christopher B Granger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 27.203
Authors: Mildren A Del-Sueldo; María A Mendonça-Rivera; Martha B Sánchez-Zambrano; Judith Zilberman; Ana G Múnera-Echeverri; María Paniagua; Lourdes Campos-Alcántara; Claudia Almonte; Amalia Paix-Gonzales; Claudia V Anchique-Santos; Claudine J Coronel; Gabriela Castillo; María G Parra-Machuca; Ivanna Duro; Paola Varletta; Patricia Delgado; Verónica I Volberg; Adriana C Puente-Barragán; Adriana Rodríguez; Aida Rotta-Rotta; Anabela Fernández; Ana C Izeta-Gutiérrez; Ana E Ancona-Vadillo; Analía Aquieri; Andrea Corrales; Andrea Simeone; Bibiana Rubilar; Carolina Artucio; Carolina Pimentel-Fernández; Celi Marques-Santos; Clara Saldarriaga; Christian Chávez; Cristina Cáceres; Dahiana Ibarrola; Daniela Barranco; Edison Muñoz-Ortiz; Edith D Ruiz-Gastelum; Eduardo Bianco; Elena Murguía; Enrique Soto; Fabiola Rodríguez-Caballero; Fanny Otiniano-Costa; Giovanna Valentino; Iris B Rodríguez-Cermeño; Ivan R Rivera; Jairo A Gándara-Ricardo; Jesús A Velásquez-Penagos; Judith Torales; Karina Scavenius; Karen Dueñas-Criado; Laura García; Laura Roballo; Lucía R Kazelian; Macarena Coussirat-Liendo; María C Costa-Almeida; Mariana Drever; Mariela Lujambio; Marildes L Castro; Maritza Rodríguez-Sifuentes; Mónica Acevedo; Mónica Giambruno; Mónica Ramírez; Nancy Gómez; Narcisa Gutiérrez-Castillo; Onelia Greatty; Paola Harwicz; Patricia Notaro; Rocío Falcón; Rosario López; Sady Montefilpo; Sara Ramírez-Flores; Silvina Verdugo; Soledad Murguía; Sonia Constantini; Thais C Vieira; Virginia Michelis; César M Serra Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Date: 2022
Authors: Henrik Holmberg; Maria Sjölander; Eva-Lotta Glader; Ulf Näslund; Bo Carlberg; Margareta Norberg; Anders Själander Journal: Eur Heart J Open Date: 2022-02-04