| Literature DB >> 31416228 |
Ayko Bresler1, Johanna Vogel2, Daniel Niederer2, Daphne Gray1, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen1, Kerstin Troidl3,4.
Abstract
Exercise is a treatment option in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients to improve their clinical trajectory, at least in part induced by collateral growth. The ligation of the femoral artery (FAL) in mice is an established model to induce arteriogenesis. We intended to develop an animal model to stimulate collateral growth in mice through exercise. The training intensity assessment consisted of comparing two different training regimens in C57BL/6 mice, a treadmill implementing forced exercise and a free-to-access voluntary running wheel. The mice in the latter group covered a much greater distance than the former pre- and postoperatively. C57BL/6 mice and hypercholesterolemic ApoE-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice were subjected to FAL and had either access to a running wheel or were kept in motion-restricting cages (control) and hind limb perfusion was measured pre- and postoperatively at various times. Perfusion recovery in C57BL/6 mice was similar between the groups. In contrast, ApoE-/- mice showed significant differences between training and control 7 d postoperatively with a significant increase in pericollateral macrophages while the collateral diameter did not differ between training and control groups 21 d after surgery. ApoE-/- mice with running wheel training is a suitable model to simulate exercise induced collateral growth in PAD. This experimental set-up may provide a model for investigating molecular training effects.Entities:
Keywords: arteriogenesis; exercise training; femoral artery ligation; mouse model; peripheral artery disease; running wheel; voluntary training
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31416228 PMCID: PMC6720754 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20163956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Daily running distance (a) and daily average speed (b) of C57BL/6 mice over time, during 7 days of adaptation in a treadmill receiving forced exercise (filled circles) or in a voluntary running wheel (open circles). Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.005.
Figure 2Plaque development in (a) the femoral artery, (b) the aortic root, and (c) the collateral artery of ApoE−/− mice following 12 weeks of high fat diet, as visualized by Oil-red-O staining. (d) Daily running distances of C57BL/6 mice (BL6, circles) compared to ApoE−/− mice (ApoE, squares) over time, pre- and post-ligation of the femoral artery (FAL). Arrows indicate short term running breaks due to anesthesia during perfusion measurements.
Figure 3Functional effects on hind limb perfusion in response to training. (a) Schematic of experimental setup in C57BL/6, (b) schematic of experimental setup in ApoE−/−, and (c,d) laser Doppler perfusion imaging in C57BL/6 and ApoE−/− as indicated. Data are expressed as ratio of the operated leg to the non-operated leg and represent mean ± SEM. Open symbols show the data of the training group whereas filled symbols represent the control group. As a statistical test, the unpaired t-test was used; * p < 0.05. (e) Representative laser Doppler perfusion images indicate the effect of training in the operated hind limb when compared to the control group. (f) Postoperative perfusion ratio (R/L). Open symbols show the data of the training group whereas filled symbols represent the control group. As a statistical test, the one-way ANOVA was used; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.005; n.s. not significant.
Figure 4Histological evaluation of collateral growth in cross sections of the adductor muscles of ApoE−/− mice in response to training. (a) Representative micrographs of collateral arteries for morphometry. Scale bar: 200µm. (b) Quantification of wall area 21 days after FAL of the training and control group. (c) Immunostaining to determine macrophage accumulation around collaterals 7 d after FAL of the training and control groups. Representative images of CD68 (green) and αSMA (red) immunostaining. Blue staining indicates nuclei and scale bars are 25 µm. (d) Quantification of macrophage number. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of three collateral cross-sections per mouse of at least three mice per group (n ≥ 3). As a statistical test, the unpaired t-test was used; * p < 0.05.