Ryuhei So1, Sachio Matsushita2, Sanae Kishimoto3, Toshi A Furukawa3. 1. Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan; Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, 3-16 Shikatahon-machi, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0915, Japan. Electronic address: nexttext@gmail.com. 2. Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Yokosuka, Japan. 3. Department of Health Promotion of Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) has been the most frequently used instrument for prevalence studies of problem gambling in the 2010s. However, the Japanese version of the PGSI has yet to be developed. OBJECTIVE: To develop the Japanese version of the PGSI and to investigate its reliability and validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We translated and back-translated the original version of the PGSI into Japanese. The author of the original PGSI confirmed the semantic equivalence between the original PGSI and its Japanese version. We examined the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the PGSI using data from a nationwide prevalence study of problem gambling conducted in Japan in 2017. RESULTS: Usable responses were obtained from 5365 residents. The PGSI had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.89) and moderate test-retest reliability after 45-60 days (intraclass coefficient: 0.54). Exploratory factor analysis revealed the unidimensionality of the PGSI. As for criterion validity, using the diagnosis of gambling disorder in DSM-5 as a reference standard, the stratum specific likelihood ratios of the PGSI score of 0 = non-problem; 1-2 = low risk; 3-7 = moderate risk; and 8-27 = problem gambling were 0.00; 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 2.22); 8.71 (5.2 to 14.5); and 67.9 (35.6 to 129.5) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend including the PGSI in future prevalence studies of problem gambling in Japan.
BACKGROUND: The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) has been the most frequently used instrument for prevalence studies of problem gambling in the 2010s. However, the Japanese version of the PGSI has yet to be developed. OBJECTIVE: To develop the Japanese version of the PGSI and to investigate its reliability and validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We translated and back-translated the original version of the PGSI into Japanese. The author of the original PGSI confirmed the semantic equivalence between the original PGSI and its Japanese version. We examined the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the PGSI using data from a nationwide prevalence study of problem gambling conducted in Japan in 2017. RESULTS: Usable responses were obtained from 5365 residents. The PGSI had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.89) and moderate test-retest reliability after 45-60 days (intraclass coefficient: 0.54). Exploratory factor analysis revealed the unidimensionality of the PGSI. As for criterion validity, using the diagnosis of gambling disorder in DSM-5 as a reference standard, the stratum specific likelihood ratios of the PGSI score of 0 = non-problem; 1-2 = low risk; 3-7 = moderate risk; and 8-27 = problem gambling were 0.00; 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 2.22); 8.71 (5.2 to 14.5); and 67.9 (35.6 to 129.5) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend including the PGSI in future prevalence studies of problem gambling in Japan.