Literature DB >> 31415780

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol).

Renly Lim1, Men Long Liong2, Ka Keat Lim3, Wing Seng Leong4, Kah Hay Yuen5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) using both anchor-based and distribution-based methods for women with stress urinary incontinence undergoing nonsurgical treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a randomized clinical trial evaluating efficacy of a nonsurgical intervention in women with stress urinary incontinence were used for analyses. The overall score of ICIQ-UI SF ranges from 0 to 21, with greater values indicating increased severity. The ICIQ-LUTSqol ranges from 19 to 76, with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life. Instruments used in the anchor-based method were the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, patient satisfaction, 1-hour pad test and the incontinence episode frequency. The distribution-based method used an effect size of 0.5 standard deviation. Triangulation of findings was used to converge on a single value of MCID.
RESULTS: At 12-month post-treatment, 106 (88.3%) participants completed the follow-up and were included in the analysis. Anchor-based MCIDs of the ICIQ-UI SF were between 3.4 and 4.4, while the distribution-based MCID was 1.7. Anchor-based MCIDs of the ICIQ-LUTSqol were between 4.8 and 6.9, while the distribution-based MCID was 5.2. Triangulation of findings showed that MCIDs of 4 for ICIQ-UI SF and 6 for ICIQ-LUTSqol were the most appropriate.
CONCLUSION: For women undergoing nonsurgical treatments for incontinence, reductions of 4 and 6 points in ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-LUTSqol, respectively are perceived as clinically meaningful.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31415780     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Clare M Tempany; Ford Holland; Daniel D Sjoberg; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jeremy C Durack; Oguz Akin; Andrew J Vickers; Peter T Scardino; Dan Sperling; Jeffrey Y C Wong; Bertram Yuh; David A Woodrum; Lance A Mynderse; Steven S Raman; Allan J Pantuck; Marc H Schiffman; Timothy D McClure; Geoffrey A Sonn; Pejman Ghanouni
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 54.433

2.  mpMRI-US Fusion-Guided Targeted Cryotherapy in Patients with Primary Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of Oncological and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Esaú Fernández-Pascual; Celeste Manfredi; Cristina Martín; Claudio Martínez-Ballesteros; Carlos Balmori; Enrique Lledó-García; Luis Miguel Quintana; Raphael Curvo; Joaquín Carballido-Rodríguez; Fernando J Bianco; Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  The placebo and nocebo effects in functional urology.

Authors:  Hadi Mostafaei; Sandra Jilch; Greta Lisa Carlin; Keiichiro Mori; Fahad Quhal; Benjamin Pradere; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Victor M Schuettfort; Abdulmajeed Aydh; Reza Sari Motlagh; Claus G Roehrborn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sakineh Hajebrahimi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Safety and Efficacy of a Disposable Vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Omar Felipe Duenas-Garcia; Robert Edward Shapiro; Peter Gaccione
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.913

5.  Effectiveness of a Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise Intervention in Improving Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Self-Efficacy among Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Parwathi Alagirisamy; Sherina Mohd Sidik; Lekhraj Rampal; Siti Irma Fadhilah Ismail
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Effect of Acupuncture for Mixed Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zilin Long; Huan Chen; Shudan Yu; Xinlu Wang; Zhishun Liu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18

7.  Effectiveness and costs of a new framework for selecting absorbent urinary incontinence products compared with current practice: a cohort study.

Authors:  Miranda C Schreuder; Henk van der Worp; Beate Balkestein; Alec Gga Malmberg; Tine van den Bos; Janny H Dekker; Michiel R de Boer; Karin M Vermeulen; Marco H Blanker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Construction of Progress Prediction Model of Urinary Incontinence in Elderly Women: Protocol for a Multi-Center, Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Lei Gao; Yuanyuan Jia; Shiyan Wang; Haibo Wang; Xiuli Sun; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.