| Literature DB >> 31415617 |
Anne Küntzel1, Michael Weber1, Peter Gierschner2, Phillip Trefz2, Wolfram Miekisch2, Jochen K Schubert2, Petra Reinhold1, Heike Köhler1,3.
Abstract
Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC) derived from bacterial metabolism during cultivation is considered an innovative approach to accelerate in vitro detection of slowly growing bacteria. This applies also to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), the causative agent of paratuberculosis, a debilitating chronic enteritis of ruminants. Diagnostic application demands robust VOC profiles that are reproducible under variable culture conditions. In this study, the VOC patterns of pure bacterial cultures, derived from three independent in vitro studies performed previously, were comparatively analyzed. Different statistical analyses were linked to extract the VOC core profile of MAP and to prove its robustness, which is a prerequisite for further development towards diagnostic application. Despite methodical variability of bacterial cultivation and sample pre-extraction, a common profile of 28 VOCs indicating cultural growth of MAP was defined. The substances cover six chemical classes. Four of the substances decreased above MAP and 24 increased. Random forest classification was applied to rank the compounds relative to their importance and for classification of MAP versus control samples. Already the top-ranked compound alone achieved high discrimination (AUC 0.85), which was further increased utilizing all compounds of the VOC core profile of MAP (AUC 0.91). The discriminatory power of this tool for the characterization of natural diagnostic samples, in particular its diagnostic specificity for MAP, has to be confirmed in future studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31415617 PMCID: PMC6695172 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Methodical factors influencing the VOC-profile during bacterial cultivation.
| Influencing factor | References | Pathogen |
|---|---|---|
| Medium composition | Ratiu et al. 2017 [ | |
| Küntzel et al. 2016 [ | MAP | |
| Nawrath et al. 2012 [ | ||
| O'Hara and Mayhew 2009 [ | ||
| Scotter et al. 2005 [ | ||
| Duration of incubation | Küntzel et al. 2016 [ | MAP |
| Rees et al. 2016 [ | ||
| Nawrath et al. 2012 [ | ||
| O'Hara and Mayhew 2009 [ | ||
| Bunge et al. 2008 [ | ||
| Bacterial density | Küntzel et al. 2016 [ | MAP |
| Trefz et al. 2013 [ | MAP | |
| Temperature | Küntzel et al. 2018 [ | |
| Oxygen supply | Rees et al. 2017 [ |
MAP: Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis
Design of the three studies taken into account for comparative exploitation.
| Study 1 | Study 2 | Study 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | [ | ||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2016 | ||||
| 1 | MAP DSM-44133 (type II, DSMZ) | A | MAP DSM-44133 (type II, DSMZ) | A | MAP DSM-44133 (type II, DSMZ) | |
| 2 | MAP 04A0386 (type III, field isolate from sheep) | B | MAP 04A0386 (type III, field isolate from sheep) | B | MAP 04A0386 (type III, field isolate from sheep) | |
| 3 | MAP 05A2421 (type II, field isolate from cattle) | C | MAP 12MA1245 (type II, field isolate from cattle) | |||
| 4 | MAP 05A3197 (type II, field isolate from cattle) | |||||
| 5 | MAP 06A0817 (type II, field isolate from red deer) | |||||
| Herrold’s Egg Yolk Medium with MJ | Herrold’s Egg Yolk Medium with MJ | Herrold’s Egg Yolk Medium with MJ | ||||
| 37°C | 37°C | 37°C | ||||
| 6 weeks | 2, 4 and 6 weeks | 4 weeks | ||||
| Original suspension (OD: n.d.) and dilutions of 10−2, 10−4 and 10−6 | Original suspension (OD: 0.316±0.015) and dilutions of 10−2, 10−4 and 10−6 | Original suspension (OD: 0.306±0.02) | ||||
| Solid phase micro extraction | Needle trap micro extraction | Needle trap micro extraction | ||||
| GC-MS | GC-MS | GC-MS | ||||
| NIST 2005 Gatesburg and analysis of pure reference substances | NIST 2005 Gatesburg and analysis of pure reference substances | NIST 2005 Gatesburg and analysis of pure reference substances | ||||
MAP: Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis, DSMZ: German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, MJ: Mycobactine J, OD: optical density, GC-MS: gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, n.d.: not defined
Fig 1Overlap of MAP-related VOCs identified in the three studies.
Left: Number of overlapping VOCs in all three studies (cluster A) and in two of the studies (clusters B-D). Right: VOCs contained in clusters A-D.
Fig 2VOC concentration levels of all substances per study normalized to the median concentration of their respective pure medium.
Values below 1 indicate a decreasing VOC concentration above MAP (↓) and values higher than 1 indicate an increasing VOC concentration above MAP (↑). A: Substances being significant for MAP in all three studies. B: Substances being significant for MAP in two of three studies. Study 1: MAP cultures n = 40, control vials n = 2, Study 2: MAP cultures n = 23, control vials n = 10, Study 3: MAP cultures n = 6, control vials n = 6.
Results of the meta-statistical analysis of MAP-related VOCs derived from the three studies with the VOCs assigned to the core-profile highlighted in bold letters.
| Chemical class | VOC | n | Std Mean | Adjusted p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP | CV | MAP | CV | |||
| 80 | 20 | 0.16 | 0.28 | <0.001 | ||
| 2-Methylbutanal | 120 | 30 | 0.24 | 0.51 | <0.001 | |
| 3-Methylbutanal | 120 | 30 | 0.16 | 0.49 | <0.001 | |
| 46 | 20 | 0.11 | 0.53 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.07 | 0.56 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.08 | 0.52 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.58 | 0.03 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.68 | 0.11 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.52 | 0.01 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.58 | 0.13 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.78 | 0.36 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.58 | 0.01 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.67 | 0.02 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.63 | 0.33 | = 0.004 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.6 | 0.12 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.61 | 0.00 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.52 | 0.00 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.26 | 0.00 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.8 | 0.11 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.62 | 0.36 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.5 | 0.16 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.64 | 0.35 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 20 | 0.52 | 0.08 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.63 | 0.01 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.67 | 0.23 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.79 | 0.3 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.49 | 0.02 | <0.001 | ||
| 46 | 20 | 0.74 | 0.02 | <0.001 | ||
| 120 | 30 | 0.65 | 0.15 | <0.001 | ||
| 80 | 12 | 0.73 | 0.39 | <0.001 | ||
| 2-Methylpropanal | 120 | 30 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.32 | |
| 2,4-Dimethylheptene | 80 | 20 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |
| 3-Octanol | 46 | 20 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.19 | |
| Hexanol | 46 | 20 | 0.37 | 0.3 | 0.77 | |
| 2-Methylfuran | 80 | 12 | 0.68 | 0.4 | 0.05 | |
| Furan | 120 | 30 | 0.49 | 0.4 | 0.19 | |
| 2-Heptanone | 120 | 30 | 0.28 | 0.4 | 0.32 | |
| 2-Methylbutanenitrile | 80 | 12 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.18 | |
| Dimethyldisulfid | 46 | 20 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.29 | |
Bold: selected core-profile, n: number of measurements
*: Mean of standardized concentration values, CV: control vials
#: Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
Fig 3Random forest classification results.
A: Variable importance plot of all relevant VOCs according to the Boruta feature selection. B: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the cross-validated Random forest classification on test data. TOP represents classification for the single feature 3-Octanone, while ALL includes 28 previously selected VOCs. The diagonal line represents the baseline for random classification. AUC–area under the curve.