Literature DB >> 31415338

Race, Poverty, and Mental Health Drive Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities in the Veterans Health Administration.

Folasade P May1,2,3, Elizabeth M Yano3,4, Dawn Provenzale5,6, William N Steers3,7, Donna L Washington1,3,7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common but largely preventable malignancy. Screening is recommended for all adults aged 50-75 years; however, screening rates are low nationally and vary by patient factors and across health care systems. It is currently unknown whether there are inequities in CRC screening rates by patient sociodemographic and/or clinical factors in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) where the majority of patients are CRC screening-eligible age and CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using VA national clinical performance and quality data to determine the overall CRC screening rate, rates by patient sociodemographic and clinical factors, and predictors of screening adjusting for patient and system factors. We also determined whether disparities in screening exist in VA.
RESULTS: The overall CRC screening rate in VA was 81.5%. Screening rates were lowest among American Indians/Alaska Natives [75.3%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.65-0.90], those with serious mental illness (75.8%; aOR=0.65, 95% CI=0.61-0.69), those with substance abuse (76.9%; aOR=0.76, 95% CI=0.72-0.80), and those in the lowest socioeconomic status quintile (79.5%; aOR=1.10-1.31 for quintiles 2-5 vs. lowest quintile 1). Increasing age, Hispanic ethnicity, black race, Asian race, and high comorbidity were significant predictors of screening uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: Many racial/ethnic disparities in CRC screening documented in non-VA settings do not exist in VA. Nonetheless, overall high VA CRC screening rates have not reached American Indians/Alaska Natives, low socioeconomic status groups, and those with mental illness and substance abuse. These groups might benefit from additional targeted efforts to increase screening uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31415338     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

1.  Using psychological interventions in the nursing care of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sumin Wang; Huiqian Tian; Rongrong Xue
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  The impact of cumulative colorectal cancer screening delays: A simulation study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; John M Inadomi; Christopher E Maerzluft
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.687

3.  Individuality and ethnicity eclipse a short-term dietary intervention in shaping microbiomes and viromes.

Authors:  Junhui Li; Robert H George Markowitz; Andrew W Brooks; Elizabeth K Mallott; Brittany A Leigh; Timothy Olszewski; Hamid Zare; Minoo Bagheri; Holly M Smith; Katie A Friese; Ismail Habibi; William M Lawrence; Charlie L Rost; Ákos Lédeczi; Angela M Eeds; Jane F Ferguson; Heidi J Silver; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 9.593

4.  Symptomatic Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Stage IV Diagnosis in Two Disparate Populations.

Authors:  Carmen Fong; Dimitri Joseph; Samuel Stanley; Yicong Zhu; Wei Zhu; Evan Grossman; Henry Talus; Maksim Agaronov; Alexandra Guillaume; Paula Denoya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  Factors Associated with Participation in Stool Based Colorectal Screening in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong; Lydiana Kadir; Zakaria Kamis; Norhayati Kassim; Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil; Jackson Tan; Elvynna Leong; Sok King Ong; Chee Fui Chong
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.