Literature DB >> 31415046

Patient-reported outcome measures for acute and chronic pain: current knowledge and future directions.

Esther Pogatzki-Zahn1, Kathrin Schnabel1, Ulrike Kaiser2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: During the past years, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become of growing awareness and importance in medical research and practice. This review summarizes recent developments concerning PROs and PROMs related to pain in the acute postoperative as well as chronic settings and indicates gaps and challenges relevant for future research and clinical applications. RECENT
FINDINGS: There are core outcome sets (COSs) of PROs and PROMs developed for specific pain conditions but patients' perception is not sufficiently considered in the development of corresponding concepts and instruments.
SUMMARY: COSs of PRO and PROMs are crucial in the field of research to enhance the comparability of results and reducing outcome reporting bias. In clinical practice PROs and PROMs are important for allocation of treatment. Concerning the development and implementation of PROs and PROMs patients' perspective should be thoroughly considered. Relating to acute as well as chronic pain there are some attempts to create COSs of PROs and PROMs but validity and reliability for both are still missing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31415046     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  8 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Pain Research: A Narrative Review of Emerging Pain Methods, Their Technosocial Implications, and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Approaches.

Authors:  Sara E Berger; Alexis T Baria
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  [Safety and monitoring of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia : Clinical practice in German hospitals].

Authors:  M I Emons; M Maring; U M Stamer; E Pogatzki-Zahn; F Petzke; J Erlenwein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Wearable Devices: Current Status and Opportunities in Pain Assessment and Management.

Authors:  Andrew Leroux; Rachael Rzasa-Lynn; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Tushar Sharma
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-19

4.  Response to Yang and Riva-Cambrin.

Authors:  Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Winfried Meissner; Peter K Zahn; Alexander Schnabel
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  [Applicability of QUIKS in conservatively treated tumor inpatients].

Authors:  Carmen Roch; Theresa Kress; Joachim Erlenwein; Winfried Meissner; Elmar Marc Brede; Birgitt van Oorschot
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 1.629

6.  Using a patient-reported outcome to improve detection of cognitive impairment and dementia: The patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS).

Authors:  James E Galvin; Magdalena I Tolea; Stephanie Chrisphonte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: A systematic review of mobile apps.

Authors:  Syed Mustafa Ali; Wei J Lau; John McBeth; William G Dixon; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Challenges and opportunities in translational pain research - An opinion paper of the working group on translational pain research of the European pain federation (EFIC).

Authors:  André Mouraux; Kirsty Bannister; Susanne Becker; David P Finn; Gisèle Pickering; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.651

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.