Janine Donaldson1, Mandisa Ngema1, Pilani Nkomozepi2, Kennedy Erlwanger1. 1. School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2. Department of Human Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fructose and cholesterol-rich diets have been implicated in the upsurge of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Phytochemicals are being explored as alternatives for the prevention and management of MetS. Thirty-six 21-day-old, female Sprague Dawley rats fed a high-fructose, high-cholesterol diet post-weaning were used to investigate the prophylactic potential of quercetin. Group 1 was given standard rat chow (SRC); Group 2: SRC and quercetin (75 mg kg-1 daily); Group 3: SRC and fenofibrate (100 mg kg-1 daily); Group 4 was given a high cholesterol diet (HCD) (2% added dietary cholesterol in SRC), 20% fructose drinking solution (FS); Group 5 was given HCD, 20% FS and quercetin (75 mg kg-1 daily); Group 6: HCD, 20% FS and fenofibrate (100 mg kg-1 daily). Rats were fed ad libitum for 8 weeks, euthanized, and blood and liver samples were collected. RESULTS: The HCD and FS significantly increased (P < 0.05) absolute and relative liver masses and serum cholesterol. Fasting blood glucose, serum triglycerides, alanine transaminase, creatinine, and urea were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between groups. The HCD and FS significantly increased liver lipid yield compared to the SRC and rats receiving SRC with fenofibrate (P < 0.05). Quercetin or fenofibrate together with HCD and FS attenuated the diet-induced increase in liver lipids by approximately 50%, although this was not statistically significant. Liver macro- and micro-steatosis scores were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in rats receiving HCD and FS. Quercetin or fenofibrate administration together with HCD and FS significantly decreased (P < 0.05) liver macro-steatosis scores. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic effect of quercetin on fructose and cholesterol diet-induced liver lipid accumulation may be exploited in the fight against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
BACKGROUND:Fructose and cholesterol-rich diets have been implicated in the upsurge of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Phytochemicals are being explored as alternatives for the prevention and management of MetS. Thirty-six 21-day-old, female Sprague Dawley rats fed a high-fructose, high-cholesterol diet post-weaning were used to investigate the prophylactic potential of quercetin. Group 1 was given standard rat chow (SRC); Group 2: SRC and quercetin (75 mg kg-1 daily); Group 3: SRC and fenofibrate (100 mg kg-1 daily); Group 4 was given a high cholesterol diet (HCD) (2% added dietary cholesterol in SRC), 20% fructose drinking solution (FS); Group 5 was given HCD, 20% FS and quercetin (75 mg kg-1 daily); Group 6: HCD, 20% FS and fenofibrate (100 mg kg-1 daily). Rats were fed ad libitum for 8 weeks, euthanized, and blood and liver samples were collected. RESULTS: The HCD and FS significantly increased (P < 0.05) absolute and relative liver masses and serum cholesterol. Fasting blood glucose, serum triglycerides, alanine transaminase, creatinine, and urea were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between groups. The HCD and FS significantly increased liver lipid yield compared to the SRC and rats receiving SRC with fenofibrate (P < 0.05). Quercetin or fenofibrate together with HCD and FS attenuated the diet-induced increase in liver lipids by approximately 50%, although this was not statistically significant. Liver macro- and micro-steatosis scores were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in rats receiving HCD and FS. Quercetin or fenofibrate administration together with HCD and FS significantly decreased (P < 0.05) liver macro-steatosis scores. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic effect of quercetin on fructose and cholesterol diet-induced liver lipid accumulation may be exploited in the fight against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
Authors: Maria Sotiropoulou; Ioannis Katsaros; Michail Vailas; Irene Lidoriki; George V Papatheodoridis; Nikolaos G Kostomitsopoulos; Georgia Valsami; Alexandra Tsaroucha; Dimitrios Schizas Journal: Saudi J Gastroenterol Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.485