Jingtai Zhi1, Yu Wu1,2, Linfei Hu1, Jingzhu Zhao1, Hui Liu2, Xianhui Ruan1, Xiukun Hou1, Jun Zhang1, Xiangqian Zheng3, Ming Gao4. 1. Department of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, West Huanhu Rd, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, West Huanhu Rd, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China. xiangqian_zheng@163.com. 4. Department of Thyroid and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, West Huanhu Rd, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China. Headandneck2008@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic veracity for disease-specific survival (DSS) of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control tumor-node-metastasis staging system (TNM-8) compared with the seventh edition (TNM-7) in a Chinese population of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and to evaluate the impact of N1b redefinition and reclassification on prediction of survival. METHODS: A total of 569 DTC patients who underwent thyroid surgery in two Chinese hospitals were included in analysis to assess the predictive accuracy and N1b changes of TNM-8. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program were applied to validate the findings on N1b changes of TNM-8. Unadjusted DSS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association of stage and lymph node metastasis (LNM) status with survival. The proportion of variation explained (PVE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were evaluated to compare model performance. RESULTS: When TNM-8 was applied, 39.7% of patients were downstaged relative to TMN-7. In comparison of TNM-7 and TMN-8, the PVE was 18.68% and 22.33%, the AIC was 704.22 and 680.50, and the BIC was 702.98 and 679.24, respectively. In 569 Chinese patients with DTC, levels I-V LNM was significantly related to poorer DSS compared with N0 and level VI LNM. Among patients aged ≥ 55 years, those with levels I-V and VII LNM had significantly worse DSS than those with N0 and Level VI LNM. In the SEER dataset, patients with levels I-V and VII LNM had significantly worse DSS compared with those with N0 and Level VI LNM, especially in older patients (age ≥ 55 years). CONCLUSIONS: TNM-8 staged a significant number of Chinese patients into lower stages and improved the accuracy of predicting DSS compared with TNM-7. However, changes in lateral LNM definition and classification of TNM-8 have a significant prognostic implication for patients with DTC, especially older patients (≥ 55 years). Our data suggest that a modified TNM staging system would be more useful for predicting mortality and determining a proper treatment strategy in patients with DTC.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic veracity for disease-specific survival (DSS) of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control tumor-node-metastasis staging system (TNM-8) compared with the seventh edition (TNM-7) in a Chinese population of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and to evaluate the impact of N1b redefinition and reclassification on prediction of survival. METHODS: A total of 569 DTCpatients who underwent thyroid surgery in two Chinese hospitals were included in analysis to assess the predictive accuracy and N1b changes of TNM-8. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program were applied to validate the findings on N1b changes of TNM-8. Unadjusted DSS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association of stage and lymph node metastasis (LNM) status with survival. The proportion of variation explained (PVE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were evaluated to compare model performance. RESULTS: When TNM-8 was applied, 39.7% of patients were downstaged relative to TMN-7. In comparison of TNM-7 and TMN-8, the PVE was 18.68% and 22.33%, the AIC was 704.22 and 680.50, and the BIC was 702.98 and 679.24, respectively. In 569 Chinese patients with DTC, levels I-V LNM was significantly related to poorer DSS compared with N0 and level VI LNM. Among patients aged ≥ 55 years, those with levels I-V and VII LNM had significantly worse DSS than those with N0 and Level VI LNM. In the SEER dataset, patients with levels I-V and VII LNM had significantly worse DSS compared with those with N0 and Level VI LNM, especially in older patients (age ≥ 55 years). CONCLUSIONS:TNM-8 staged a significant number of Chinese patients into lower stages and improved the accuracy of predicting DSS compared with TNM-7. However, changes in lateral LNM definition and classification of TNM-8 have a significant prognostic implication for patients with DTC, especially older patients (≥ 55 years). Our data suggest that a modified TNM staging system would be more useful for predicting mortality and determining a proper treatment strategy in patients with DTC.
Authors: Iain J Nixon; Laura Y Wang; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Antoine Eskander; Michael J Campbell; Ahmad Aniss; Lilah Morris; Fernanda Vaisman; Rossana Corbo; Denise Momesso; Mario Vaisman; Andre Carvalho; Diana Learoyd; William D Leslie; Richard W Nason; Deborah Kuk; Volkert Wreesmann; Luc Morris; Frank L Palmer; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Bhuvanesh Singh; R Michael Tuttle; Ashok R Shaha; Mithat Gönen; K Alok Pathak; Wen T Shen; Mark Sywak; Luis Kowalski; Jeremy Freeman; Nancy Perrier; Jatin P Shah Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Sophie Leboulleux; Carole Rubino; Eric Baudin; Bernard Caillou; Dana M Hartl; Jean-Michel Bidart; Jean-Paul Travagli; Martin Schlumberger Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Iain J Nixon; Laura Y Wang; Frank L Palmer; R Michael Tuttle; Ashok R Shaha; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly Journal: Surgery Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Lauren N Pontius; Taofik O Oyekunle; Samantha M Thomas; Michael T Stang; Randall P Scheri; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa Journal: Thyroid Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Carlo La Vecchia; Matteo Malvezzi; Cristina Bosetti; Werner Garavello; Paola Bertuccio; Fabio Levi; Eva Negri Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 7.396