Literature DB >> 31414016

Practice-Based Research Networks Ceding to a Single Institutional Review Board: A Report From the INSTTEPP Trial and Meta-LARC Consortium.

Jeanette M Daly1, Tabria Weiner Harrod2, Kate Judge3, LeAnn C Michaels2, Barcey T Levy1, David L Hahn3, Lyle J Fagnan2, Donald E Nease4.   

Abstract

Historically, a single research project involving numerous practice-based research networks (PBRNs) required multiple institutional review boards (IRBs) to be involved in approval of the project. However, to avoid redundancies, federal IRB regulations now allow cooperative research projects that involve more than one institution to use reasonable methods of cooperative IRB review and to cede authority for review and oversight of the project to a single lead IRB. Through ceding, a lead IRB has the authority for review and oversight of the project delegated by all participating sites' IRBs and becomes the IRB of record for the ceded sites. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution or primary care office site is still responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with applicable regulations. The purpose of this report is to delineate the process, including cooperation and effort of personnel, for accomplishing IRB approval for the Implementing Networks' Self-management Tools Through Engaging Patients and Practices (INSTTEPP) clinical trial. This process involved 4 PBRNs, 16 family physician offices, 4 academic institution's IRBs, and 4 family practice office external IRBs ceding to the lead IRB. Once ceding was accomplished, subsequent IRB modifications and continuing reviews were the responsibility of the lead IRB, ultimately saving time for all participants and keeping the project on schedule.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ceding; cooperative research; institutional review board; practice-based research networks; regulation

Year:  2018        PMID: 31414016      PMCID: PMC6676763          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  7 in total

1.  Cooperative research ethics review boards: a win-win solution?

Authors:  Greg Koski; Jessica Aungst; Joel Kupersmith; Kenneth Getz; David Rimoin
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 May-Jun

2.  Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.

Authors:  Lee A Green; Julie C Lowery; Christine P Kowalski; Leon Wyszewianski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution.

Authors:  Ned Norman; Chris Bennett; Shirley Cowart; Maret Felzien; Martha Flores; Rafael Flores; Connie Haynes; Mike Hernandez; Mary Petra Rodriquez; Norah Sanchez; Sergio Sanchez; Kathy Winkelman; Steve Winkelman; Linda Zittleman; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.

Authors:  Stacia A Finch; Shari L Barkin; Richard C Wasserman; Niramol Dhepyasuwan; Eric J Slora; Robert D Sege
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2009-12

5.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-19

6.  The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.

Authors:  Leslie E Wolf; Mary Croughan; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Notes from the field: jumpstarting the IRB approval process in multicenter studies.

Authors:  Jan Blustein; Marsha Regenstein; Bruce Siegel; John Billings
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Integration of Improvement and Implementation Science in Practice-Based Research Networks: a Longitudinal, Comparative Case Study.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Rose Gunn; Erin Kenzie; Caitlin Dickinson; Cullen Conway; Alex Chau; LeAnn Michaels; Steven Brantley; Devon K Check; Nancy Elder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 6.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.