Literature DB >> 31413972

Factors in Patient Responsiveness to Directional Preference-Matched Treatment of Neck Pain With or Without Upper Extremity Radiation.

Benjamin Holmes1,2, Ruta Brazauskas2, Laura D Cassidy2, Rachel A Wiegand1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-related predictive factors in responsiveness to directional preference therapy for neck pain with or without upper extremity radiation (NP/R) have not been reported. A directional preference is any neck movement that, when performed repeatedly to end range, results in centralization and/or alleviation of NP/R. It was hypothesized that patient compliance with a prescribed, directional preference-matched home exercise program would improve positive responsiveness to NP/R treatment.
METHODS: Patient-related factors thought to affect responsiveness to care were collected retrospectively from charts and de-identified for patients with NP/R who underwent chiropractic treatment at a multispecialty spine clinic from January 2014 through June 2015. Responsiveness was measured by calculating the percentage change in Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) scores over treatment time. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors associated with positive responsiveness.
RESULTS: Mean percentage change in patient NBQ score from initial intake to discharge was 50% (standard deviation: 32%). Of 104 patients meeting study inclusion criteria, 86 (83%) reported experiencing improvement after the first treatment session. Bivariate analysis of patient characteristics by compliance with directional preference-matched exercise indicated that compliant patients (n=95, 91%) demonstrated significantly greater responsiveness to care than did noncompliant patients, at 55% versus 25% change in NBQ score, respectively (P=0.0041). Four factors were statistically significant predictors of patient responsiveness to directional preference therapy for NP/R: patient compliance with directional preference-matched exercise (P=0.0023), patient age (P=0.0029), condition chronicity (P<0.0001), and whether the patient reported improvement of symptoms following initial treatment session (P=0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that patient compliance with directional preference exercise is associated with patient responsiveness to conservative treatment of NP/R, as are age, chronicity and report of immediate symptom improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bournemouth questionnaire; directional preference; neck pain

Year:  2017        PMID: 31413972      PMCID: PMC6664371          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  26 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial comparing general exercise, McKenzie treatment and a control group in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Görel Kjellman; Birgitta Oberg
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Internal strains in healthy and degenerated lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Anthony Tsantrizos; Keita Ito; Max Aebi; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care neck and back pain patients: 'McKenzie' vs brief physiotherapy pain management.

Authors:  J Klaber Moffett; D A Jackson; E D Gardiner; D J Torgerson; S Coulton; S Eaton; M P Mooney; C Pickering; A J Green; L G Walker; S May; S Young
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients.

Authors:  Jennifer E Bolton; B Kim Humphreys
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  The association of the involvement of financial compensation with the outcome of cervicobrachial pain that is treated conservatively.

Authors:  C Rasmussen; L Rechter; I Schmidt; V K Hansen; K Therkelsen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain.

Authors:  Helen A Clare; Roger Adams; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  McKenzie classification of mechanical spinal pain: profile of syndromes and directions of preference.

Authors:  Cheryl Hefford
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-12-22

8.  Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures.

Authors:  Hugh Hurst; Jennifer Bolton
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Neck collar, "act-as-usual" or active mobilization for whiplash injury? A randomized parallel-group trial.

Authors:  Alice Kongsted; Erisela Qerama; Helge Kasch; Tom Bendix; Flemming Winther Bach; Flemming Winther; Lars Korsholm; Troels Staehelin Jensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Active intervention in patients with whiplash-associated disorders improves long-term prognosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Rosenfeld; Aris Seferiadis; Jane Carlsson; Ronny Gunnarsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.