Literature DB >> 31413492

Variation of Grip Strength and Wrist Range of Motion with Forearm Rotation in Healthy Young Volunteers Aged 23 to 30.

Stacy Fan1,2, Jeremy Cepek1, Caitlin Symonette2, Douglas Ross3, Shrikant Chinchalkar4, Aaron Grant5.   

Abstract

Background Grip strength and wrist range of motion (ROM) are important metrics used to evaluate hand rehabilitation and outcomes of wrist interventions. Published normative data on these metrics do not recognize the contribution of forearm rotation. This study aims to identify and quantify variations in grip strength and wrist ROM with forearm rotation in healthy young individuals. Materials and Methods Wrist ROM and grip strength were measured in 30 healthy volunteers aged 23 to 30. Participant demographics, grip strength, and wrist ROM (wrist flexion and extension, ulnar and radial deviation) at three forearm positions (full supination, neutral, and full pronation) were measured using a digital dynamometer and standard goniometers. Data analysis was conducted using a one-way repeated measure ANOVA. Forearm position values were compared using post hoc analysis. Results Grip strength in males was greatest in neutral position (males: nondominant 51.4 kg, dominant 56.1 kg) followed by supination (males: nondominant 46.6 kg, dominant 51.7 kg) and weakest in pronation (males: nondominant 40.1 kg, dominant 42.9 kg). Grip strength in females was similar between supination (nondominant: 26.1 kg, dominant: 28.5 kg) and neutral (nondominant: 27.4 kg, dominant: 29.1 kg) positions, but both were greater than in pronation (nondominant: 22.3 kg, dominant: 24.1 kg). Wrist flexion in males was significantly reduced in supination compared with neutral and pronated positions (nondominant: supination 63.1°, neutral 72.6°, pronation 73.3°; dominant: supination 62.4°, neutral 70.2°, pronation 70.3°), whereas not significant wrist flexion in females was also weaker in supination (supination 74.4°, neutral 79.9°). Wrist extension in males was greater in pronation (supination 64.6°, pronation 69.5°) whereas females showed no significant difference in any of the forearm positions. Ulnar deviation in males did not differ with forearm position, but females demonstrated greater ulnar deviation in supination on the nondominant hand (supination 44.6°, pronation 33.2°). Whereas there was no difference in radial deviation with forearm position in females, it was markedly greater in pronation versus supination on both sides in males (nondominant: supination 16.3°, pronation 24.6°; dominant: supination 15.4°, pronation 23.9°). Conclusion This study characterizes variations in grip strength and wrist ROM in three forearm positions in healthy young individuals. All measurements differed with forearm rotation and were not influenced by hand dominance. These results suggest that wrist ROM and grip strength should be evaluated in different positions of forearm rotation, rather than a fixed position. This has functional implications particularly in patients involved with specialized activities such as sports, instrument-playing, or work-related activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional range; grip strength; rehabilitation; wrist motion

Year:  2018        PMID: 31413492      PMCID: PMC6692155          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Microsurg        ISSN: 0974-3227


  14 in total

1.  The effects of complex wrist and forearm posture on wrist range of motion.

Authors:  M M Marshall; J R Mozrall; J E Shealy
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapy services.

Authors:  Jane Case-Smith
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

3.  Normal wrist motions.

Authors:  C E NEMETHI
Journal:  Ind Med Surg       Date:  1953-05

4.  Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Timothy I Carter; Brian Pansy; Aviva L Wolff; Howard J Hillstrom; Sherry I Backus; Mark Lenhoff; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: a comparison between two populations.

Authors:  E Allander; O J Björnsson; O Olafsson; N Sigfússon; J Thorsteinsson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Human skeletal muscle fiber type alteration with high-intensity intermittent training.

Authors:  J A Simoneau; G Lortie; M R Boulay; M Marcotte; M C Thibault; C Bouchard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1985

7.  Normative data on wrist function.

Authors:  Matthias Klum; Maya B Wolf; Peter Hahn; Franck M Leclère; Thomas Bruckner; Frank Unglaub
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping.

Authors:  Jeremy P M Mogk; Peter J Keir
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Functional ranges of motion of the wrist joint.

Authors:  J Y Ryu; W P Cooney; L J Askew; K N An; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Hand Grip Strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study.

Authors:  Nicola M Massy-Westropp; Tiffany K Gill; Anne W Taylor; Richard W Bohannon; Catherine L Hill
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-04-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Minimal Damage to the Supinator Muscle After the Double-Incision Technique for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Davide Blonna; Alberto Olivero; Claudia Galletta; Valentina Greco; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Fracassi; Marco Davico; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.