Literature DB >> 31413183

Web-based decision aid tool for disclosure of a mental health condition in the workplace: a randomised controlled trial.

Elizabeth Stratton1,2, Isabella Choi3,2, Rafael Calvo4, Ian Hickie3, Claire Henderson5, Samuel B Harvey6,7,8, Nicholas Glozier3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Making decisions about disclosing a mental illness in the workplace is complicated. Decision aid tools are designed to help an individual make a specific choice. We developed a web-based decision aid to help inform decisions about disclosure for employees. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of this tool.
METHOD: We conducted a randomised controlled trial with recruitment, randomisation and data collection all online. Participants had access to the intervention for 2 weeks. Assessments occurred at baseline, postintervention and 6 weeks' follow-up. The primary outcome was decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes were stage and satisfaction of decision-making and mental health symptoms.
RESULTS: 107 adult employees were randomised to READY (n=53) or the control (n=54). The sample was predominantly female (83.2%). Participants using READY showed greater reduction in decisional conflict at postintervention (F(1,104)=16.8, p<0.001) (d=0.49, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9) and follow-up (F(1,104)=23.6, p<0.001) (d=0.61, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9). At postintervention the READY group were at a later stage of decision-making (F(1,104)=6.9, p=0.010) which was sustained, and showed a greater reduction in depressive symptoms (F(1,104)=6.5, p=0.013). Twenty-eight per cent of READY users disclosed, and reported a greater improvement in mental health than those who did not disclose.
CONCLUSIONS: READY provides a confidential, flexible and effective tool to enhance employee's decision-making about disclosure. Its use led to a comparative improvement in depressive symptoms compared with the current information provided by a leading mental health non-governmental organisation, without apparent harm. READY seems worth evaluating in other settings and, if these results are replicated, scaling for wider use. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618000229279. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision aid; disclosure; employee; mental health condition; workplace

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31413183     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

Review 1.  Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guixian Tong; Qingqing Geng; Debin Wang; Tongzhu Liu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A Sensibility Assessment of the Job Demands and Accommodation Planning Tool (JDAPT): A Tool to Help Workers with an Episodic Disability Plan Workplace Support.

Authors:  Monique A M Gignac; Julie Bowring; Sabrina Tonima; Renee-Louise Franche; Aaron Thompson; Arif Jetha; Peter M Smith; Joy C Macdermid; William S Shaw; Dwayne Van Eerd; Dorcas E Beaton; Emma Irvin; Emile Tompa; Ron Saunders
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Evaluation of an intervention to support decisions on disclosure in the employment setting (DECIDES): study protocol of a longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K M E Janssens; J van Weeghel; C Henderson; M C W Joosen; E P M Brouwers
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Trends in Effectiveness of Organizational eHealth Interventions in Addressing Employee Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Stratton; Amit Lampit; Isabella Choi; Hanna Malmberg Gavelin; Melissa Aji; Jennifer Taylor; Rafael A Calvo; Samuel B Harvey; Nick Glozier
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Return to Work after Common Mental Disorders: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Expectations of the Involved Stakeholders.

Authors:  Jessica Scharf; Peter Angerer; Gesine Müting; Adrian Loerbroks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.