Literature DB >> 31413102

The effect of environmental enrichment on behavioral variability depends on genotype, behavior, and type of enrichment.

Jamilla Akhund-Zade1, Sandra Ho1, Chelsea O'Leary1, Benjamin de Bivort2.   

Abstract

Non-genetic individuality in behavior, also termed intragenotypic variability, has been observed across many different organisms. A potential cause of intragenotypic variability is sensitivity to minute environmental differences during development, which are present even when major environmental parameters are kept constant. Animal enrichment paradigms often include the addition of environmental diversity, whether in the form of social interaction, novel objects or exploratory opportunities. Enrichment could plausibly affect intragenotypic variability in opposing ways: it could cause an increase in variability due to the increase in microenvironmental variation, or a decrease in variability due to elimination of aberrant behavior as animals are taken out of impoverished laboratory conditions. In order to test these hypothesis, we assayed five isogenic Drosophila melanogaster lines raised in control and mild enrichment conditions, and one isogenic line under both mild and intense enrichment conditions. We compared the mean and variability of six behavioral metrics between our enriched fly populations and the laboratory housing control. We found that enrichment often caused a small increase in variability across most of our behaviors, but that the ultimate effect of enrichment on both behavioral means and variabilities was highly dependent on genotype and its interaction with the particular enrichment treatment. Our results support previous work on enrichment that presents a highly variable picture of its effects on both behavior and physiology.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; High-throughput assay; Individuality; Intragenotypic variability; Microenvironmental sensitivity; Quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31413102     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Early social context does not influence behavioral variation at adulthood in ants.

Authors:  Iago Sanmartín-Villar; Raphaël Jeanson
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.734

2.  Precise Quantification of Behavioral Individuality From 80 Million Decisions Across 183,000 Flies.

Authors:  Benjamin de Bivort; Sean Buchanan; Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria; Erika Gajda; Julien Ayroles; Chelsea O'Leary; Pablo Reimers; Jamilla Akhund-Zade; Rebecca Senft; Ryan Maloney; Sandra Ho; Zach Werkhoven; Matthew A-Y Smith
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  anTraX, a software package for high-throughput video tracking of color-tagged insects.

Authors:  Asaf Gal; Jonathan Saragosti; Daniel Jc Kronauer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning.

Authors:  Jacob M Graving; Daniel Chae; Hemal Naik; Liang Li; Benjamin Koger; Blair R Costelloe; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Enriched environment for offspring improves learning and memory impairments induced by sevoflurane exposure during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shao-Wei Yin; Yi-Lin Meng; Chuang Li; Yuan Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Environmental and Molecular Modulation of Motor Individuality in Larval Zebrafish.

Authors:  John Hageter; Matthew Waalkes; Jacob Starkey; Haylee Copeland; Heather Price; Logan Bays; Casey Showman; Sean Laverty; Sadie A Bergeron; Eric J Horstick
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 7.  Behavior Individuality: A Focus on Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rubén Mollá-Albaladejo; Juan A Sánchez-Alcañiz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Survey on the Past Decade of Technology in Animal Enrichment: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  K Cassie Kresnye; Chia-Fang Chung; Christopher Flynn Martin; Patrick C Shih
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.