| Literature DB >> 31412668 |
Lizhu Ma1, Liqiang Wang1, Huimin Gao1, Ning Liu1, Yuxin Zheng1, Yan Gao2, Shujie Liu3, Zhongliang Jiang4.
Abstract
Female animals living in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau have lower ovulation rates because of the hypoxic environment, however, the mechanism of hypoxia on animal follicles is unclear. In this study, the effects of hypoxia on bovine follicles were investigated using an in vitro follicular culture system. The results show that there was a significant decrease in follicular diameter from day 3 to day 6 in both hypoxia and hypoxia with estrogen (E2) and fulvestrant (ICI 182780) (hypoxia + E2 + ICI) groups, when compared with a normoxia group (p < 0.05). We also observed significant downregulation of ERα and FSHR, while upregulation of LHCGR expression in the hypoxia group and hypoxia + E2 + ICI groups compared to the normoxia group (p < 0.05). The expression of IGF1 gene was significantly downregulated in hypoxia + E2 + ICI group when compared to the hypoxia + E2 group (p < 0.05). The expression of HIF1A, ADAMTS1, VEGFA, and EDN2 were upregulated in both hypoxia and hypoxia + E2 + ICI groups in comparison to normoxia group (p < 0.05). Under hypoxic conditions, the addition of E2 resulted in a decrease of HIF1A protein but an increase of ERα protein in cultured bovine follicles (p < 0.05). In summary, hypoxia limits the growth of bovine follicle cultured in vitro through inhibition of ERα.Entities:
Keywords: bovine; estrogen receptor; follicle; hypoxia
Year: 2019 PMID: 31412668 PMCID: PMC6721027 DOI: 10.3390/ani9080551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Bovine specific primers used for real-time PCR.
| Gene | Forward Primers (5′–3′) | Reverse Primers (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ATATCGCTGCGCTGGTCGTC | GCTGCCTCAACACCTCAACCC |
|
| AATTCTGACAATCGACGCCAG | GTGCTTCAACATTCTCCCTCCTC |
|
| GCTCCCAATGCAGACCTCTT | CCTCCAGTTTGCAAAGGCAC |
|
| TGCCTTTGACAACCTCCTCA | AGCATCTGGTTCAGGAGCAC |
|
| CTTGAAGCAGGTGAAGATGCC | AGAGCATCCACCAACTCAGC |
|
| AGATCTCGGCGAAGCAAAGAGT | CGGCATCCAGAAGTTTTCTCACAC |
|
| TGCTCCAAGACATGCGGCTCAG | TGGTACTGGCTGGCTTCACTTCC |
|
| CTGTGCAGGCTGCTGTAACG | GTTCCCGAAACCCTGAGGAG |
|
| CTGGCCTGAAGCTGTGGT | ATAGGGGCCAGCCATGAT |
The effects of hypoxia on follicular diameter in vitro.
| Items | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (μm) | 145.33 ± 6.53 | 175.45 ± 7.84 A | 238.36 ± 10.67 Ba | 281.70 ± 15.55 Ca | 316.67 ± 8.59 Da | 342.26 ± 11.86 Ea |
| Hypoxia (μm) | 146.26 ± 8.31 | 173.63 ± 5.48 A | 205.48 ± 9.22 Bb | 235.87 ± 12.30 Cb | 258.16 ± 8.65 Db | 276.37 ± 7.52 Ec |
| Hypoxia + E2 (μm) | 146.33 ± 4.21 | 172.34 ± 4.78 A | 230.25 ± 7.61 Ba | 275.07 ± 10.24 Ca | 307.61 ± 9.85 Da | 321.66 ± 8.11 Eb |
| Hypoxia + E2 + ICI (μm) | 146.26 ± 8.31 | 174.36 ± 8.45 A | 211.36 ± 2.92 Bb | 240.78 ± 3.12 Cb | 261.65 ± 6.81 Db | 281.67 ± 5.27 Ec |
Data are means ± SEM. of three independent replicates. Values within a row without a common superscript (A–E) indicated significant differences (p < 0.05). Values within a column without a common superscript (a–b) indicated differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Effects of hypoxia on relative expression of ERα, FSHR, LHCGR, and IGF1 genes in bovine follicles. C, Control; H, Hypoxia; H + E, Hypoxia with E2; and H + E + I, Hypoxia with E2 and ICI. Different letters (a,b) on the bar means significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effects of hypoxia on relative expression of HIF1A, ADAMTS1, VEGFA, and EDN2 genes in bovine early preantral follicles. C, Control; H, Hypoxia; H + E, Hypoxia with E2; and H + E + I, Hypoxia with E2 and ICI. Different letters (a–c) on the bar means significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effects of Hypoxia on the expressions of HIF1A (A) and ERα (B) proteins in bovine early preantral follicles. C, Control; H, Hypoxia; H + E, Hypoxia with E2; H + E + I, Hypoxia with E2 and ICI. Different letters (a,b) on the bar means significant differences (p < 0.05).