| Literature DB >> 31412654 |
Cesar A Meza-Herrera1, Carlos A Romero-Rodríguez2,3, Adrian Nevárez-Dominguez2, Arnoldo Flores-Hernández2, Omag Cano-Villegas4, Ulises Macías-Cruz5, Miguel Mellado6, Guadalupe Calderón-Leyva6, Dalia Carrillo-Moreno6, Francisco G Véliz-Deras6.
Abstract
The effect of protein enriched Opuntia cladodes supplementation upon changes of serum total protein, urea, cholesterol, glucose as related to estrus induction (EI%), estrus latency (EL, h), and ovulation rate (OR, units) in adult anestrous goats exposed to the male effect was evaluated. In late April, anestrus goats (n = 45, 25° N) homogeneous regarding live weight (LE; 43.8 ± 1.6 kg) and body condition score (BCS; 2.3 ± 0.1 units) were randomly assigned to: (1). Protein-enriched Opuntia (PEO; n = 15; 29.8% CP, 2.2 Mcal ME kg-1), (2). Non-enriched Opuntia (NEO; n = 15; 6.4% CP, 2.1 Mcal ME kg-1), and (3). Control (CON; n = 15). NEO and PEO goats were individually supplemented with cladodes (160 g d-1; 0900-1000 h), thereafter all groups grazed in a marginal rangeland (1000-1800 h). Neither LW (p > 0.05) nor BCS (p > 0.05) differed among groups, yet an increased (p < 0.05) EI % (100, 57, 42 ± 0.16%), EL h (62, 60, 32 ± 4.2 h), and OR (1.33, 0.71, 0.43 ± 0.23 units) occurred in PEO and NEO vs. CONT, respectively. However, neither blood metabolites differed among groups nor a treatment x time interaction occurred. Peri-breeding protein enriched Opuntia cladodes supplementation of anestrous goats exposed to active males increased (p < 0.01) reproductive outcomes during the non-breeding season.Entities:
Keywords: Opuntia; goats; male effect; reproductive efficiency; targeted supplementation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31412654 PMCID: PMC6719177 DOI: 10.3390/ani9080550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Mean chemical composition (SD), dry-basis, of Opuntia megacantha Salm-Dyck cladodes either portein-enriched (PEO), non-protein enriched (NO), and offered as supplement to adult mix-breed (Alpine-Saanen-Nubian × Criollo; n = 45) female goats exposed to testosterone treated bucks and to an increased natural photoperiod (Apr–June; anestrous season) under semiarid-subtropical rangeland conditions in Northern Mexico (25° N).
| Components | NEO, Fresh | NEO, Dry | PEO, Fresh | PEO, Dry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM, % | 12.9 | 92.1 | 12.5 | 92.0 |
| CP, % | 6.4 | 4.9 | 29.8 | 20.5 |
| NDF, % | 21.3 | 14.7 | 18.3 | 17.5 |
| ADF, % | 19.7 | 11.9 | 16.6 | 17.9 |
| NFC, % | 43.8 | 53.3 | 24.4 | 33.9 |
| TND, % | 53.1 | 61.0 | 57.2 | 56.4 |
| NEm, Mcal/kg DM | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| Ash, % | 27.9 | 24.7 | 25.5 | 26.7 |
NEm was calculated using equations proposed by the National Research Council (2007).
Figure 1A schematic representation of the experimental protocol of targeted supplementation with Opuntia megacantha Salm-Dyck cladodes either protein-enriched (PEO) or non-protein enriched (NEO) as well as not supplemented control (CC) to adult mix-breed (n = 45; Alpine-Saanen-Nubian × Criollo) female goats exposed to testosterone treated bucks and to an increased natural photoperiod (Apr–Jun; anestrous season) under semiarid-subtropical rangeland conditions in Northern Mexico (25° N). Note: More details were previously described in the main body of the text.
Least square means regarding live weight (kg) body condition score (units), serum blood metabolites, and ovarian traits in adult mix-breed (Alpine-Saanen-Nubian × Criollo; n = 45) female goats supplemented with Opuntia megacantha Salm-Dyck cladodes either natural (NEO) or protein-enriched (PEO) or non-supplemented control (CON). Adult goats were exposed to testosterone treated bucks and faced an increased natural photoperiod (Apr–June; anestrous season) under semiarid-subtropical rangeland conditions in Northern Mexico (25° N) .
| Variables | NEO | PEO | CON | S.E. (2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LW-initial, kg | 43.9 a | 44.5 a | 45.1 a | 1.6 |
| BCS-initial, units | 2.6 a | 2.6 a | 2.6 a | 0.10 |
| LW-d30, kg | 43.9 a | 43.8 a | 45.4 a | 1.7 |
| BCS-final, units | 2.5 a | 2.5 a | 2.6 a | 0.20 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 102.0 a | 98.1 a | 96.6 a | 8.7 |
| Cholesterol, mg/dL | 158.1 a | 165.1 a | 156.1 a | 8.2 |
| Total protein, g/dL | 6.2 a | 5.9 a | 5.9 a | 0.4 |
| Urea, mg/dL | 49.1 a | 46.5 a | 46.9 a | 2.4 |
| Estrus induction, % | 57 b | 100 a | 43b | 12 |
| Estrus latency, h | 60 a | 62 a | 32 b | 4.1 |
| Ovulation rate, units | 0.71 b | 1.33 a | 0.43 b | 0.20 |
(1) While no differences among treatments occurred regarding serum blood metabolites (p > 0.05), ovarian traits differed among experimental groups (p < 0.05). (2) Most conservative standard error is presented. Different superscripts within variable, show differences (p < 0.05).