Literature DB >> 31412141

We need more realistic climate change experiments for understanding ecosystems of the future.

Lotte Korell1,2,3, Harald Auge2,3, Jonathan M Chase2,4, Stanley Harpole1,2,5, Tiffany M Knight1,2,3.   

Abstract

Experiments that alter local climate and measure community- and ecosystem-level responses are an important tool for understanding how future ecosystems will respond to climate change. Here, we synthesized data from 76 studies that manipulated climate and measured plant community responses, and found that most climate change experiments do not correspond to model-projected climate scenarios for their respective regions. This mismatch constrains our ability to predict responses of plant biodiversity and ecosystem functions to climate change, and we conclude with suggestions for a way forward. See also the Commentary on this article by Muller et al., 26, e4-e5 and De Boeck et al.,26, e6-e7.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  biodiversity; climate change; climate change experiments; climate projections; ecosystem functioning; global circulation models; terrestrial ecosystems

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31412141     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Drought-exposure history increases complementarity between plant species in response to a subsequent drought.

Authors:  Yuxin Chen; Anja Vogel; Cameron Wagg; Tianyang Xu; Maitane Iturrate-Garcia; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Alexandra Weigelt; Nico Eisenhauer; Bernhard Schmid
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Advancing global change biology through experimental manipulations: Where have we been and where might we go?

Authors:  Paul J Hanson; Anthony P Walker
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Responses of plant diversity to precipitation change are strongest at local spatial scales and in drylands.

Authors:  Lotte Korell; Harald Auge; Jonathan M Chase; W Stanley Harpole; Tiffany M Knight
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Effects of climate change and pollen supplementation on the reproductive success of two grassland plant species.

Authors:  Martin Andrzejak; Lotte Korell; Harald Auge; Tiffany M Knight
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Low statistical power and overestimated anthropogenic impacts, exacerbated by publication bias, dominate field studies in global change biology.

Authors:  Yefeng Yang; Helmut Hillebrand; Malgorzata Lagisz; Ian Cleasby; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 13.211

6.  Field experiments underestimate aboveground biomass response to drought.

Authors:  György Kröel-Dulay; Andrea Mojzes; Katalin Szitár; Michael Bahn; Péter Batáry; Claus Beier; Mark Bilton; Hans J De Boeck; Jeffrey S Dukes; Marc Estiarte; Petr Holub; Anke Jentsch; Inger Kappel Schmidt; Juergen Kreyling; Sabine Reinsch; Klaus Steenberg Larsen; Marcelo Sternberg; Katja Tielbörger; Albert Tietema; Sara Vicca; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 19.100

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.