| Literature DB >> 31411997 |
Paolo Dell'Oglio1, Geert De Naeyer2, Lyu Xiangjun3, Zachary Hamilton4, Umberto Capitanio5, Francesco Ripa5, Francesco Cianflone5, Fabio Muttin5, Peter Schatteman2, Frederiek D'Hondt2, Xin Ma3, Ahmet Bindayi4, Xu Zhang3, Ithaar Derweesh4, Alexandre Mottrie6, Francesco Montorsi5, Alessandro Larcher7.
Abstract
Available comparison of transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (tRAPN) and retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN) does not consider tumour's location. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity, and functional and pathological outcomes after tRAPN and rRAPN, with the specific hypothesis that tRAPN for anterior tumours and rRAPN for posterior tumours might be a beneficial strategy. A large global collaborative dataset of 1169 cT1-2N0M0 patients was used. Propensity score matching, and logistic and linear regression analyses tested the effect of tRAPN versus rRAPN on perioperative outcomes. No differences were observed between rRAPN and tRAPN with respect to complications, operative time, length of stay, ischaemia time, median 1-yr estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and positive surgical margins (all p>0.05). Median estimated blood loss and postoperative eGFR were 50 versus100ml (p<0.0001) and 82 versus 78ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.04) after rRAPN and tRAPN, respectively. At interaction tests, no advantage was observed after tRAPN for anterior tumours and rRAPN for posterior tumours with respect to complications, warm ischaemia time, postoperative eGFR, and positive surgical margins (all p>0.05). The techniques of rRAPN and tRAPN offer equivalent perioperative morbidity, and functional and pathological outcomes, regardless of tumour's location. PATIENTEntities:
Keywords: Kidney cancer; Nephron-sparing surgery; Retroperitoneal; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Transperitoneal; Tumour's location
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31411997 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Urol Oncol ISSN: 2588-9311