Literature DB >> 31411987

Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Kristian D Stensland1, Harras Zaid2, Mark Broadwin3, Andrea Sorcini2, David Canes2, Matt Galsky4, Alireza Moinzadeh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While there is established evidence supporting the use of radical cystectomy (RC) and perioperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, such evidence does not exist for squamous cell carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: We present the largest study to date of patients with squamous cell carcinoma and compare the effectiveness of possible treatment regimens for overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cases of localized, muscle-invasive pure squamous cell bladder cancer, classified as clinical stage T2/3N0M0. Permutations of surgery (RC), chemotherapy, and external beam radiation were selected. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A multinomial propensity score method was used to create treatment weights based on clinical characteristics predicting the probability of treatment receipt. These were then applied in weighted Cox proportional hazards models to assess the comparative effectiveness of treatments for overall survival, adjusting for age, TNM clinical stage, Charlson comorbidity index, race, sex, and facility and county level variables. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 828 cases were included, comprising 465 RC alone, 53 neoadjuvant chemotherapy+RC, 48 RC+adjuvant chemotherapy, 72 chemotherapy alone, 88 radiation alone, and 102 chemoradiation cases. On weighted regression, RC treatment with or without perioperative chemotherapy was associated with significantly better overall survival compared to the other treatment modalities; chemotherapy alone, radiation alone, and chemoradiation were associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of death of 2.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-3.59), 4.78 (95% CI 3.33-6.86), and 1.61 (95% CI 1.16-2.25), respectively, compared to RC alone (all p<0.005). A combination of RC and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was comparable to RC alone, with HR of death 1.33 (95% CI 0.89-1.98). The combination of RC and adjuvant chemotherapy was also similar to RC alone (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66-1.85). These findings are limited by small numbers and the retrospective nature of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: RC with or without perioperative chemotherapy should be considered an upfront therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Using a national database, we compared treatments for muscle-invasive squamous cell bladder cancer. Patients undergoing radical cystectomy with or without chemotherapy had longer survival. Radical cystectomy with or without chemotherapy should be the standard of care for this disease.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Comparative effectiveness; Squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31411987     DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  3 in total

1.  Molecular profile of pure squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder identifies major roles for OSMR and YAP signalling.

Authors:  Carolyn D Hurst; Guo Cheng; Fiona M Platt; Olivia Alder; Emma Vi Black; Julie E Burns; Joanne Brown; Sunjay Jain; Jo-An Roulson; Margaret A Knowles
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 2.  The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for variant histology bladder cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Francesco Chierigo; Guglielmo Mantica; J M Quesada-Olarte; D M Carrion; Juan Gomez-Rivas; Alvaro Pinto-Marin; Alfredo Aguilera Bazan; Luis Martinez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-11-07

3.  Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Variant Histology Bladder Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Zhu; Yunyuan Xiao; Shengye Hu; Ziyuan Wang; Zaisheng Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.