Literature DB >> 31410938

Clinical factors, diagnostic delay, and residual deficits in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Carina Bunschoten1, Patricia H Blomkwist-Markens2, Anja Horemans2, Pieter A van Doorn1, Bart C Jacobs1,3.   

Abstract

Management of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is complicated by the challenging diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity, and treatment response. Real world data about the current practice of care in CIDP are rare, but important to improve clinical guidelines. In this study, we determined the current practice of diagnosis and treatment in relation to the clinical outcome of patients with CIDP in a cross-sectional study in The Netherlands. All patients registered at the Dutch neuromuscular patient organization and patients at the Erasmus Medical Center were approached. CIDP diagnosis was confirmed by using patient files and expert consensus. The response rate was 137/197 (70%) and the diagnosis CIDP was confirmed in 112 patients. The time from onset of symptoms until CIDP diagnosis was median 5 months and > 12 months in 26% of the patients. Patients with a late diagnosis (>5 months) compared to patients with an early diagnosis (≤5 months) more frequently had another initial diagnosis (P < .001), multifocal abnormalities (P = .011), final diagnosis made in university hospitals (P = .001), and more (residual) complaints, also illustrated via two patient reported, validated clinical outcome measures. Although 97% of patients received treatment, 88% reported (residual) neurological symptoms and deficits. CIDP diagnosis is often delayed, especially in patients with atypical CIDP variants. Diagnostic delay may result in delayed initiation of treatment. A more rapid and accurate diagnosis of CIDP may prevent or at least reduce residual neurological deficits and accompanying disability in CIDP.
© 2019 Peripheral Nerve Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; clinical outcome measures; diagnosis; residual neurological deficits; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31410938     DOI: 10.1111/jns.12344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst        ISSN: 1085-9489            Impact factor:   3.494


  3 in total

1.  [Public health situation of CIDP patients in nine German centers-neuritis network Germany].

Authors:  Anna Lena Fisse; Jeremias Motte; Thomas Grüter; Felix Kohle; Cornelius Kronlage; Jan-Hendrik Stahl; Natalie Winter; Tabea Seeliger; Stefan Gingele; Frauke Stascheit; Benjamin Hotter; Juliane Klehmet; Karsten Kummer; Elena K Enax-Krumova; Dietrich Sturm; Thomas Skripuletz; Jens Schmidt; Min-Suk Yoon; Kalliopi Pitarokoili; Helmar C Lehmann; Alexander Grimm
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 1.297

2.  Epidemiology of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Merel C Broers; Marcel de Wilde; Hester F Lingsma; Johan van der Lei; Katia M C Verhamme; Bart C Jacobs
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 5.188

3.  The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes.

Authors:  Yuan Feng; Yu Zhang; Xiaoyun Su; Chuansheng Zheng; Zuneng Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.