Huaqi Zhang1,2, Lei Deng3, Xin Wang4, Duoying Wang4, Feifei Teng5, Jinming Yu6,7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University, Heping, Tianjin, 300070, China. 2. Shandong Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center, Jinan, China. 3. Antai Plasma Collection Station, Jinan, China. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China. tengfeifei16@126.com. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University, Heping, Tianjin, 300070, China. sdyujinming@163.com. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China. sdyujinming@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: This study was designed to evaluate the role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in a selected patient population with oligometastatic extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) without brain or liver involved. The underlying hypothesis was that TRT will improve outcomes in this favorable patient population. METHODS: 305 patients were included in an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, of which 105 received TRT after chemotherapy (ChT) and 200 received ChT alone. The survival outcomes were compared between ChT+TRT group and ChT-alone group in patients with oligometastasis without brain or liver involved and patients with brain/liver/multimetastasis, respectively. RESULTS: The 1-year, 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) for all patients were 60.3%, 23.9% and 1.6%, respectively. The addition of TRT significantly improved PFS in total patients than ChT alone (14.5 months vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.006), but the OS benefit was not significant (17.8 months vs. 16.5 months, p = 0.061). For patients with oligometastasis (n = 118), TRT offered significant progression free survival (PFS) (16.5 months vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.005) and OS (19.2 months vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.039) benefits. However, for patients with brain/liver/multimetastasis, the PFS and OS were not improved with TRT (p = 0.49, p = 0.811). CONCLUSIONS: TRT provided significant PFS and OS benefits in patients with oligometastatic ES-SCLC without brain or liver involved. The consolidative TRT is a reasonable treatment option for this favorable patient population.
BACKGROUNDS: This study was designed to evaluate the role of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in a selected patient population with oligometastatic extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) without brain or liver involved. The underlying hypothesis was that TRT will improve outcomes in this favorable patient population. METHODS: 305 patients were included in an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, of which 105 received TRT after chemotherapy (ChT) and 200 received ChT alone. The survival outcomes were compared between ChT+TRT group and ChT-alone group in patients with oligometastasis without brain or liver involved and patients with brain/liver/multimetastasis, respectively. RESULTS: The 1-year, 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) for all patients were 60.3%, 23.9% and 1.6%, respectively. The addition of TRT significantly improved PFS in total patients than ChT alone (14.5 months vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.006), but the OS benefit was not significant (17.8 months vs. 16.5 months, p = 0.061). For patients with oligometastasis (n = 118), TRT offered significant progression free survival (PFS) (16.5 months vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.005) and OS (19.2 months vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.039) benefits. However, for patients with brain/liver/multimetastasis, the PFS and OS were not improved with TRT (p = 0.49, p = 0.811). CONCLUSIONS:TRT provided significant PFS and OS benefits in patients with oligometastatic ES-SCLC without brain or liver involved. The consolidative TRT is a reasonable treatment option for this favorable patient population.
Authors: Nasser Hanna; Paul A Bunn; Corey Langer; Lawrence Einhorn; Troy Guthrie; Thaddeus Beck; Rafat Ansari; Peter Ellis; Michael Byrne; Mark Morrison; Subramanian Hariharan; Benjamin Wang; Alan Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Jeremic; Y Shibamoto; N Nikolic; B Milicic; S Milisavljevic; A Dagovic; J Aleksandrovic; G Radosavljevic-Asic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ramaswamy Govindan; Nathan Page; Daniel Morgensztern; William Read; Ryan Tierney; Anna Vlahiotis; Edward L Spitznagel; Jay Piccirillo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth M Gore; Chen Hu; Alexander Y Sun; Daniel F Grimm; Suresh S Ramalingam; Neal E Dunlap; Kristin A Higgins; Maria Werner-Wasik; Aaron M Allen; Puneeth Iyengar; Gregory M M Videtic; Russell K Hales; Ronald C McGarry; James J Urbanic; Anthony T Pu; Candice A Johnstone; Volker W Stieber; Rebecca Paulus; Jeffrey D Bradley Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Patrick Micke; Andreas Faldum; Tsegay Metz; Kai-Michael Beeh; Fernando Bittinger; Jan-Georg Hengstler; Roland Buhl Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Corinne Faivre-Finn; Michael Snee; Linda Ashcroft; Wiebke Appel; Fabrice Barlesi; Adityanarayan Bhatnagar; Andrea Bezjak; Felipe Cardenal; Pierre Fournel; Susan Harden; Cecile Le Pechoux; Rhona McMenemin; Nazia Mohammed; Mary O'Brien; Jason Pantarotto; Veerle Surmont; Jan P Van Meerbeeck; Penella J Woll; Paul Lorigan; Fiona Blackhall Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Michael Stokes; Noami Berfeld; Alicia Gayle; Andrew Descoteaux; Oscar Rohrmoser; April Franks Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 1.817