Literature DB >> 31410473

Nurse-led care is preferred over GP-led care of gout and improves gout outcomes: results of Nottingham Gout Treatment Trial follow-up study.

Amy Fuller1,2, Wendy Jenkins1, Michael Doherty1,2, Abhishek Abhishek1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore patient satisfaction, gout knowledge, medication adherence and flares among participants receiving nurse-led or general practitioner (GP)-led care of gout in the Nottingham Gout Treatment Trial phase-II (NGTT-II).
METHODS: A total of 438 participants of NGTT-II were sent a questionnaire enquiring about gout knowledge, satisfaction with health-care practitioner, urate-lowering treatment being undertaken, and gout flares ⩾1 year after their final visit. Nurse-led care participants were asked about their preference for receiving gout treatment from either a GP or a nurse.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 82% of participants. Participants previously receiving nurse-led care reported greater satisfaction with health-care practitioner (P < 0.001), had better gout knowledge (P = 0.02), were more likely to be taking urate-lowering treatment [adjusted relative risk (95% CI) 1.19 (1.09, 1.30)], and self-reported fewer flares in the previous 12 months [median (inter-quartile range) 0 (0-0) vs 1 (0-3), P < 0.001] than those receiving GP-led care. Of participants receiving nurse-led care, 41-63% indicated preference for receiving gout treatment from a nurse, while only 5-20% indicated preference for receiving treatment from GPs.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study favour nurse-led care, involving individualized patient education and engagement and a treat-to-target strategy, in terms of patient acceptability, long-term adherence, and flares. Further research is required to evaluate the feasibility of implementing such a model of care in clinical practice.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; gout; patient education; urate-lowering treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31410473     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  6 in total

1.  Mapping Knowledge Structure and Global Research Trends in Gout: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2001 to 2021.

Authors:  Pengfei Wen; Pan Luo; Binfei Zhang; Yumin Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29

2.  Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) common language definition of gout.

Authors:  Rachel Murdoch; Michael J Barry; Hyon K Choi; Daniel Hernandez; Brianne Johnsen; Manuel Labrador; Susan Reid; Jasvinder A Singh; Robert Terkeltaub; Janitzia Vázquez Mellado; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-04

3.  Patient Perspectives on Gout and Gout Treatments: A Patient Panel Discussion That Informed the 2020 American College of Rheumatology Treatment Guideline.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Tuhina Neogi; John D FitzGerald
Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11-22

4.  Acceptability of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain: Nurse and patient views and experiences.

Authors:  Polykarpos Angelos Nomikos; Michelle C Hall; Amy Fuller; Reuben Ogollah; Ana M Valdes; Michael Doherty; David Andrew Walsh; Roshan das Nair; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A glance into the future of gout.

Authors:  Francisca Sivera; Mariano Andres; Nicola Dalbeth
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.625

6.  Reasons for discontinuing urate-lowering treatment in community-dwelling adults with gout: results of a primary care-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dalia Elmelegy; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2021-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.