Literature DB >> 31410364

Primary Angiosarcoma of the Kidney: Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.

Andrea Boni1, Giovanni Cochetti1, Angelo Sidoni2, Guido Bellezza2, Emanuele Lepri1, Andrea De Giglio3, Morena Turco4, Jacopo Adolfo Rossi De Vermandois1, Michele Del Zingaro1, Roberto Cirocchi1, Ettore Mearini1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Angiosarcoma (AS) is an aggressive malignant tumour of endothelial origin, most frequently compelling the skin. The kidney is a rare site of primary occurrence of AS with a quite challenging diagnosis and poor prognosis, mainly due to its raw metastasising power. We described our first case of AS treatment. A comprehensive literature review in this field is also carried out. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the case of a 56-years-old man with radiological appearance of an 11 cm poor vascularised left renal mass. The pre-operative imaging ruled out distant metastases and inferior vena cava thrombosis. Thus, after radioembolization, we performed a transperitoneal open radical nephrectomy with regional lymphadenectomy with the removal of the middle portion of the ileo-psoas muscle, followed by two lines of adjuvant chemotherapy. We analysed all the papers concerning primary kidney AS until December 2018.
RESULTS: Estimated intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL with an operative time of 100 minutes. No postoperative complications were recorded, with the patient discharge in the 8th postoperative day. The pathological assessment showed a pT3a N0, M0 tumour compatible with AS of the kidney. An immune-histochemical study showed a vascular positive for CD31, CD34, Fli-1 with a Ki-67/Mib 1 of 50%. One month after surgery the patient began adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine. After 45 days from surgery, a Computed Tomography scan showed lung and liver metastases with disease relapse in the left kidney lodge. The response to the first-line treatment was excellent, unlike the second-line, encountering a chemo-refractory disease. The cancer-specific survival was of 15 months. We included 66 cases in our review.
CONCLUSION: This is the first case of treatment of kidney AS performed at our Institute. Our findings added new information about the unclear biology and progression of this subset of tumours, demonstrating an abysmal prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antineoplastic Agents; Kidney; Local neoplasm recurrence; Nephrectomy; Prognosis; Recurrence; Sarcoma; Treatment Failure; Vascular Tissue Neoplasms

Year:  2019        PMID: 31410364      PMCID: PMC6689208          DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Med (Wars)


Introduction

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rapid growth tumour of endothelial origin, which accounts for less than 2% of soft tissue sarcomas [1]. Most cases happen in older white men with an extremely high mortality rate mainly due to distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis or shortly afterwards. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), mean survival of 7.7 months was met [2]. Endothelial cells are considered the source of AS, but an origin from circulating stem cells recruited from bone marrow or extra-medullary hematopoiesis is argued [3, 4]. The skin accounts for approximately one-third of cases, especially in the head and neck region or the extremities [5]. Regardless of the primary organ affected, the five years overall survival rate is estimated to be 10-35%, with metastases found commonly in the lungs, liver, and bone, because of early hematogenous dissemination [6]. The bulk of the related literature describes the origin in a healthy kidney as a site of uncommon primary occurrence, reporting only a case of primary AS associated with a renal angiomyolipoma [7]. Some pathological conditions were listed as predisposing factors, but no direct causal relationship was ever demonstrated [8, 9, 10], as well as vinyl chloride, thorium dioxide, or radiation exposition [9]. The role of some genes involved in the receptor protein tyrosine kinase pathway was recently described [11]. The radiological diagnosis of this neoplasm is quite challenging because of the various overlapping characteristics with other tumoural subtypes. Thus, pathological examination with immune-histochemical findings remains essential. The surgical approach seems to ensure the more significant advantage in terms of prognosis, with adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy proposed to improve the cancer-specific survival, even if no standard treatment can be still set. However, in advanced renal disease, the role of surgery is still debated, mainly due to the significant morbidity and the development of effective adjuvant systemic therapies. This study aimed to describe the first case of AS with extensive necrosis occurring in our Institute, interesting the left kidney. The follow-up was of 15 months until the patient died of the disease. In an attempt to identify prognostic factors and optimal treatment strategy, we also performed a comprehensive literature review, thus improving the knowledge about the aggressive behaviour of this tumour.

Material and methods

To provide helpful information to treat our case, we searched the published papers with the terms of ‘primary angiosarcoma of the kidney’ and ‘primary renal angiosarcoma’ in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Embase databases, without language limitation. All articles and case reports of primary AS of the kidney until December 2018 were included. We obtained clinical and pathological data, including maximum tumour dimension measured in centimetres, laterality, and immune-histochemical expression of the tumour cells. Informed consent has been obtained from patient included in this study. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.

Case report

A 56-years-old male patient presented to the “Santa Maria della Misericordia” Hospital (Perugia, Italy) with left flank pain. An abdominal ultrasound scan detected a mass in the middle third of the left kidney measuring 8 x 10 cm, toward the lower pole, relatively round shaped. A whole-body Computed Tomography (CT) scan confirmed the presence of 11 cm lower pole mass in the left kidney. It appeared poorly vascularized by the appearance of large central collapsed area with signs of the infiltration of perirenal fat and perirenal band and various small lymph nodes under centimetres at the level of the mesenteric fan (Figure 1). The rapid peripheral enhance-wash-out of the contrast agent in the early arterial phase suggested a
Figure 1

Preoperative computed tomography (ct) scan (a: axial reconstruction; b: coronal reconstruction) showing a mass with a poor vascularization and a collapsed area in the lower pole of the left kidney.

Preoperative computed tomography (ct) scan (a: axial reconstruction; b: coronal reconstruction) showing a mass with a poor vascularization and a collapsed area in the lower pole of the left kidney. Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). No signs of the infiltration of the arterial-venous vascular peduncle or distant metastases were detected, confirmed after that by a bone scan. The patient presented a single preoperative episode of macroscopic hematuria after diagnostic imaging. One day before surgery, we performed a left renal artery catheter embolisation using a Haemostatic Absorbable Gelatin Sponge (Spongostan, Ethicon™, Somerville, NJ, USA) and polyvinyl alcohol to decrease intraoperative bleeding risk. Then the patient underwent open radical nephrectomy with hilar and para-aortic lymph node dissection made by an expert urologist surgeon (EM) [12, 13, 14]. We removed the perirenal fat tissue, the ipsilateral adrenal gland, a 25 mm tract of the ureter, and the middle portion of the ileo-psoas muscle. According to our review, radical nephrectomy is the most effective treatment for primary AS (Table 1); surgery was not listed as primary treatment in only 2 cases [15, 16].
Table 1

Literature review of primary kidney angiosarcoma

AuthorAge (yy)SexSideClinical presentationSize (cm)MetsSites (initial and subsequent mets)TreatmentFollow-up (months)Outcome
Qayyum et al.[14]86MRwl, fatigue, dizziness12.3YesLiver, lungsPalliative (patient’s wish)NANA
Zhang et al.[39]52MLfp, left leg pain8YesLiver, boneNephrNANA
Liu et al.[38]75MRhematuria4NoNoNephr, RT6NED
Brown et al.[43]68MRNA24YesLiverNA6DOD
Brown et al.[43]64MLNA30NoNoNA11DOD
Brown et al.[43]71MLNA10YesPeritoneal and periaortic LNNA1DOD
Brown et al.[43]72MLNANANoNoNANANA
Brown et al.[43]29FLNA3.7NANANA1DOD
Brown et al.[43]62MNANANANANANephrNANA
Brown et al.[43]67MRNANANANANephrNANA
Brown et al.[43]95MRNA15.5NANANephr2DFUD
Cason et al.[18]46MLfp, wl13NoBone, liver, abdominal soft tissueNephr, chemotherapy, RT10DOD
Allred et al.[44]67MRfp, hematuria13YesLungs, liverNephr, chemotherapy3DOD
Peters et al.[45]74MLwl19YesLungs, liver, abdominal wall, headNephr2DOD
Prince et al.[17]51MLfp, hematuria10NoNoNephr, RTNAA&W
Sabharwal et al.[40]67MLloin pain, wl, loss of appetite13YesSpleenNephr, chemotherapy1NA
Chaabouni et al.[46]59MRfp, hematuria6.5NoNoNephr1DOD
López Cubillana et al.[47]72MRhematuria13NoBone and lungNephr, chemotherapy5DOD
Singh et al.[33]83MLhematuria13NoNoNANANA
Askari et al.[48]24MRhematuria, ureteric obstruction9NoNoNephr4DOD
Douard et al.[49]60MRNANAYesBone, lungNephr3DOD
Terris et al.[36]47MLfp19YesDiaphragm, renal artery, liver and boneNephr, RT10DOD
Zenico et al.[50]56MLincidental finding20NoNoNephr4DOD
Desai et al.[51]54MLfp, hematuria21NoBoneNephr, chemotherapy4DOD
Johnson et al.[15]50MLfp, hemoptysis9YesLiver, lungRapid deteriorationNADOD
Kern et al.[52]69MLfp, wl, hematuria26YesLungNephr1.5DOD
Kern et al.[52]52MLhematuria8YesLungNephr3DOD
Fukunaga et al.[32]61MLincidental finding8NoLiver, bone and retroperitoneumNephr13DOD
Adjiman et al.[53]36MRhemoptysis, fp, fever10.5YesChest wall, skinNephrNADOD
Papadimitriou et al.[9]68MLfp, dysuria, hematuria10NoNoNephrNAA&W
Tsuda et al.[54]77MLhematuria, renal failure10NoRetroperitoneum, liverNephr21DOD
Leggio et al.[34]60MLpost-trauma abd pain12NoSpleen, peritoneumNephr8DOD
Mordkin et al.[55]75MLfever, wl19YesSpleen, bone, liver, soft tissue, oral cavityNephr, chemotherapy, SNANA
Akkad et al.[35]58MRincidental finding4.5NoNoNephr30NED
Cerilli et al.[56]67MRfp, hematuria12.5YesRenal veinNephr, RT6DOD
Aksoy et al.[57]55MLabd pain, rupture with retroperitoneal hematoma13NoNoNephr, S3DOD
Hiratsuka et al.[19]59FRhematuria4.5NoNoNephr29NED
Aydogdu et al.[58]77MLNANANANANephrNANA
Martinez- Pineiro et al.[37]66MLabd pain, anorexia, asthenia11.5NoBone, liver, lungsNephr5DOD
Lee et al.[28]63MNANANANANANANANA
Berretta et al.[59]67MNANANANANANephr, chemotherapyNANA
Souza et al.[60]75MLwl, fp, hematuria15NoNoNephrNADFUD
Costero-Barrios et al.[61]71MLhematuria, fp18NoLiver and retroperitoneumNephr, chemotherapy, RT12Recurrence
Grapsa et al.[62]65MRfever, fatigue, dyspnea13.8YesLiver, lungNANANA
Carnero Lopez et al.[22]29FLHemoptysis11YesLungsNephr, chemotherapy5DOD
Sesar et al.[63]65MLincidental finding4.5NANANephro-NANA
Pauli et al.[63]57MLhemoptysis15YesLungs, boneureterectomy Nephr, RT2DOD
Yoshida et al.[64]78MLfp18YesLiver, boneNephr, immunotherapy13DOD
Juan et al.[65]81FNAhematuria5YesLiver, boneNephr, chemotherapy, RT9DOD
Xuan et al.[66]63MLpain and costal swelling10NANANephrNANA
Yau et al.[67]38FRhematuria, bone pain13YesBone, LNNephr, chemotherapy, RT3DOD
Garmendia et al.[68]51MNANANANANANANANA
Nguyen et al.[69]53MLhematuria, fp7YesLungNephr, chemotherapy18DOD
Limmer et al.[70]48MLfp10NoLung, soft tissue, muscleNephr1DOD
Matter et al.[71]62MLfp, abd mass18NoLungNephr, chemotherapy, RT18DOD
Sanyal et al.[72]30MNANANANoNoNephr, RT24DOD
Testa et al.[73]NANANANANANANANANANA
Yamamoto et al.[74]68MRincidental finding7NoNoNephr, RT19NED
Rüb et al.[75]59MLhematuria, wl18NoLungs, liverNephr, chemotherapy12AWD
Celebi et al.[76]57MRfp, hematuria14NoLungs, pelvisNephr, chemotherapy13DOD
Li et al.[77]69FLNANANANANANANA
Witczak et al.[78]44FNAhematuriaNANANANephrNANA
Cuadra-Urteaga et al.[79]44MRhematuria7.5NoNoNephro- ureterectomy2DOD
Iannaci et al.[26]56MLlower back pain and hematuria4YesLungsNephrNADOD
Su[80]53FRright lower abd pain8.5NoLocal advancedNephr, chemotherapyNADFUD
Gourley et al.[10]NAMRacute right fp12.5NoNoNephrNANA
Guan et al.64FLfp, fatigue, wl18NoLocal advancedMass excision, chemotherapy4DOD

Notes:

Abbreviations: Mets, metastases; dx, diagnosis; M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right; NA, not available; abd, abdominal; fp, flank pain; wl, weight loss; LN, lymph node; Nephr, Nephrectomy; NED, no evidence of disease; DFUD, died from unrelated disease; AWD, alive with disease; DOD, died of disease; RT, radiotherapy; S, splenectomy; A&W, alive and well.

Literature review of primary kidney angiosarcoma Notes: Abbreviations: Mets, metastases; dx, diagnosis; M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right; NA, not available; abd, abdominal; fp, flank pain; wl, weight loss; LN, lymph node; Nephr, Nephrectomy; NED, no evidence of disease; DFUD, died from unrelated disease; AWD, alive with disease; DOD, died of disease; RT, radiotherapy; S, splenectomy; A&W, alive and well.

Results

Estimated intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL and operative time was 100 minutes. The hospital stay was eight days long. Seven days after surgery, serum creatinine and eGFR were 0.98 mg/dL and 81 mL/minute, respectively; after three months, these parameters were the same. No postoperative complications occurred. The surgical specimen consisted of the entire left kidney, weighing 1,080 g and measuring 16 x 11.5 x 7 cm with a portion of the striated muscular belly of ileo-psoas, measuring 3.6 x 2.5 cm. The visible appearance of the solid tumour, located in the lower middle third of the kidney, was a cavitated hemorrhagic necrotising mass of about 14 x 9 cm (Figure 2). Specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at four μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological examination showed vasoformative areas with ramifying channels lined by atypical endothelial cells together with more solid areas lacking vasoformative and composed by high-grade spindle-shaped cells with large hyperchromatic nuclei and prominent nucleoli (Figure 3a). The psoas muscle tissue, surgical margins, ureter, renal artery and vein, and left para-aortic lymph nodes did not appear infiltrated by the tumour. The immune-histochemical study showed strongly and diffusely positive staining for CD31 (Figure 3b), CD34, Fli-1, and remained harmful for pan-cytokeratin, MelanA, HMB45, PGM1, PAX8, GATA3, CD10, racemase, p63, smooth muscle actin, desmin, HHV8; Ki-67/ Mib 1:50%. These findings indicated that the tumour was an AS of the kidney. Ipsilateral adrenal adenoma was also detected.
Figure 2

Operative specimen demonstrating.

Figure 3

Angiosarcoma (as) of the kidney. (A) clusters of atypical spindle-shaped cells forming irregular vascular channels and rudimentary lumen formation (haematoxylin-eosin, 200x); (b) immunostain for cd31 shows intense staining of most as cells (200x).

Operative specimen demonstrating. Angiosarcoma (as) of the kidney. (A) clusters of atypical spindle-shaped cells forming irregular vascular channels and rudimentary lumen formation (haematoxylin-eosin, 200x); (b) immunostain for cd31 shows intense staining of most as cells (200x). After 45 days from the surgical procedure, the patient developed hemoptysis. A total body CT scan was then performed with the evidence of a nodular mass of about 3 cm in the left kidney lodge (Fig. 4) and at the level of the left parietal-colic ligament, both showing contrast enhancement after administration of contrast medium. Furthermore, it showed several nodular opacities of the lungs with ground glass opacity (Fig. 5), and multiples hypodense liver lesions (Fig. 6), suggestive of distant metastases. Therefore, the patient underwent bronchoscopy with bioptic samples. The histological report was negative for neoplastic proliferation. In some macrophages, there was the presence of hemosiderin.
Figure 4

Axial (a) and coronal (b) reconstruction on ct scan showing a local recurrence of tumoral tissue (red arrow) in the left kidney lodge, alongside the parieto-colic ligament.

Figure 5

CORONAL CT SCAN showing several nodular opacities of the lungs with ground glass opacity and tree-in-bud signs

Figure 6

AXIAL (A) and CORONAL (B) RECONSTRUCTION on CT SCAN showing multiples hypodense liver lesions. The arrow point the biggest one of almost 10 mm of diameter.

Axial (a) and coronal (b) reconstruction on ct scan showing a local recurrence of tumoral tissue (red arrow) in the left kidney lodge, alongside the parieto-colic ligament. CORONAL CT SCAN showing several nodular opacities of the lungs with ground glass opacity and tree-in-bud signs AXIAL (A) and CORONAL (B) RECONSTRUCTION on CT SCAN showing multiples hypodense liver lesions. The arrow point the biggest one of almost 10 mm of diameter. We presented the case within the Italian Rare Cancer Network (IRCN), and the patient started first-line chemotherapy with Gemcitabine (1000 mg/mq, day 1-8-15, IV every 21 days) after two months from the surgical procedure, followed by an immediate clinical improvement after the first cycle. The CT scan evaluation performed three months later, showed a brilliant partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria, [17] namely with an almost complete abdominal response and a significant reduction of several lung lesions. A re-assessment CT scan, performed in May 2018, after 11 cycles of therapy, pointed out a severe lung and soft tissue progression. Thus, the patient started second-line chemotherapy with Olaratumab (15 mg/Kg, day 1-8) and Doxorubicin (75 mg/kg, day 1-8) given intravenously every 21 days. Unfortunately, a fast-worsening disease occurred with an impressive progression in lungs, liver, and soft-tissues, confirmed by a total body CT scan assessed after three cycles. The chemotherapy regimen was switched to a weekly Paclitaxel schedule (80 mg/mq). At last, the patient died after four cycles due to hepatic insufficiency. The flow-chart reports the clinical sequence of the patient.

Discussion

Over the past few years, significant concerns emerged about the standard treatment of AS, mainly due to the advances in the understanding of its aggressive behaviour [1]. AS unusually harbours from the kidney, and it was first described by Prince in 1942 [18], after a clear definition of this heterogeneous group of the tumour was set [19, 20]. Numerous overlapping radiological characteristics could be observed in particular with RCC [14, 21, 22]. Nowadays, we noted a prevalence of incidental diagnosis in the RCC, while the most common clinical presentation of AS includes macroscopic hematuria (81%), flank pain (38%), or a palpable renal mass (31%) [23]. Its typical histopathological features are the presence of aberrant vascular structures with malignant endothelial cells. Primary renal AS has a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate mainly due to local recurrence and an early hematogenous spread. Metastases are usually found at the time of diagnosis or develop within a couple of months after surgery. Thus, the absence of detectable metastases at the time of operation does not improve the survival rate, with a minimal number of patients surviving more than one year [8]. Several substances such as thorium dioxide (Thorotrast®) for cerebral angiography, insecticides, and vinyl chloride were linked to the induction of hepatic AS [6, 24, 25, 26]. Conditions associated with the development of AS were radiotherapy, filariasis, chronic lymphedema of any cause (Stewart-Treves syndrome), and von Recklinghausen’s disease, with a recently reported case of AS arising in schwannoma of the kidney [5, 27]. Another example was said to origin in a polycystic kidney [10]. However, none of these risk factors has been proven to have a direct causal relationship with renal AS. The role of some genes, such as p53, VEGF, Ras, Myc, and MDM2, have been explored but their interaction in the development of tumoral phenotype is far to be found [11, 28]. Even if no stable radiological features exist for renal AS, in case of enhancing hypervascular rim and a non-enhancing centre with fast wash-out of the contrast medium, a differential diagnosis with angiomyolipoma shall be done. After that, an advanced RCC and carcinosarcoma should be ruled out [14, 29]. In the latter case the interphase sarcomatous component and carcinomatous one result sharp. In the literature, only one instance of a Von-Hippel-Lindau negative patient exists, showing the presence of minute clear cell carcinomas between AS and non-tumoral renal parenchyma [30]. To our knowledge, one case of fine-needle aspiration cytology with the application of immune-histochemical analysis was reported in an 83-year-old man, referred to the oncologists for primary chemotherapy [31]. The demonstration of endothelial cell line molecules, like CD31, CD34, and human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen, was accounted with high specificity and sensitivity [32]. Furthermore, the presence of numerous anastomosing small vessels enveloped by polymorphic tumour cells was probably the consequence of the non-hypoxia induced intratumoral activation with an autonomous, non-dependent by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase receptor activation [33]. Cavernous hemangioma-like, sinusoidal and papillary arrangements might also arise in the tumour [30]. Clinical flow-chart reporting main uro-oncological proceedings Clinical flow-chart reporting main uro-oncological proceedings continued Clinical flow-chart reporting main uro-oncological proceedings continued Regarding the treatment of the soft tissue sarcomas, it always involves radical surgery, as margin negativity is crucial for the cure. The role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy remains controversial, even if the latter has demonstrated to improve local control of the disease [34]. The present is an exceptional primary case of AS of the kidney, which updates the limited literature in this field. Beyond its rarity, the lack of information available makes this tumour very difficult to treat. This case occurred in the left kidney of a 56-year-old white man, free of genetic syndromes. He underwent cerebral angiography with thorium dioxide for a cerebrovascular study about thirty years before AS occurrence. The disease developed insidiously, starting with flank pain, gross hematuria one week before surgery, and weight loss (10 kg in 15 days). Its clinical presentation is in line with that expected by previous reports. Metastases were not detectable at the preoperative CT scan, even if one was suspected in ipsilateral adrenal gland together with infiltration of the psoas muscle. These acquisitions did not stop us from performing a primary surgical strategy to remove all the pathologic tissue since it was demonstrated to be the most effective treatment approach [35]. Based on the histopathological analysis, we found the presence of a benign adenoma, without the involvement of the adrenal gland and the absence of infiltration of the psoas muscle. The endothelial nature of the neoplastic cells in our case was verified by diffuse positive immune-histochemical staining for the highly sensitive vascular marker CD-34 in 100% of the tumour cells [9, 35]. The raising proliferative nature of the tumour is suggested by the Ki-67 index reported to be 30% [36], 40% (9) [37], and >80% [38] respectively. In our specimen, the Ki-67 index was about 50%, and we now confirm it to indicate a high aggressiveness of this tumour. After the patient was referred to the oncologist, he performed a two months follow-up CT scan showing local recurrence in the kidney lodge measuring 3 cm and peritoneal, liver, and lung metastases. Although the first line chemotherapy regimen of choice for metastatic AS included anthracyclines plus ifosfamide, often it can be difficult to administer for a suboptimal performance status (PS ECOG 3-4) or advanced age [17]. In this case, the fast-worsening clinical presentation induced to use gemcitabine as the first line, following a retrospective experience collected by the IRCN [39]. As above mentioned, the patient presented an excellent response to the treatment with good progression-free survival of 12 months, but the following line of therapy did not determine any effect, encountering a chemo-refractory disease with a cancer-specific survival of 15 months.

Conclusion

Primary AS of the kidney represents a rare variant of renal parenchymal cancer with a high potential of malignancy, profoundly affecting cancer-specific survival. Our findings add new information about the biology and progression of these neoplasms in the attempt to achieve the definition of a standard approach to this tumour.
  72 in total

Review 1.  [Angiosarcoma of the kidney. Case report and review of the literature].

Authors:  L E Matter; R Flury; S Hailemariam; D Hauri; T Sulser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Primary angiosarcoma of the liver. Review article.

Authors:  D P Alrenga
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1975-04

3.  Spontaneous rupture of a renal angiosarcoma.

Authors:  Yilmaz Aksoy; Nesrin Gürsan; Isa Ozbey; Okan Biçgi; Muzaffer Keleş
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Fine-needle aspiration of renal angiosarcoma.

Authors:  Viviana V Johnson; Erich M Gaertner; Barbara A Crothers
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Coincidental acute myeloblastic leukemia in a patient with renal angiosarcoma.

Authors:  I Aydogdu; O Turhan; R Sari; M Ates; M Türk
Journal:  Haematologia (Budap)       Date:  1999

Review 6.  [Primary renal hemangiosarcoma. Case report and review of the literature].

Authors:  S Limmer; T Wagner; E Leipprand; H Arnholdt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 7.  [Primary renal epithelioid angiosarcoma with transitional cell carcinoma in renal pelvis].

Authors:  N Li; W Li; Z Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  1997-05

Review 8.  [Fatal evolution of a renal angiosarcoma].

Authors:  Pedro López Cubillana; Enrique Martínez Barba; Gerardo Server Pastor; Antonio Prieto González; Belén Ferri Níguez; Enrique Cao Avellaneda; Ana Isabel López López; José Antonio Nicolás Torroalba; Mariano Rigabert Montiel; Jesús Tornero Ruiz; José Antonio García Hernández; Guillermo Gómez Gómez; Pablo Martínez Pertusa; Angel Guardiola Mas; Mariano Pérez Albacete
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.436

9.  [Primary renal angiosarcoma].

Authors:  Cesáreo B Costero-Barrios; Cuauhtémoc Oros-Ovalle
Journal:  Gac Med Mex       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.302

Review 10.  Hepatic angiosarcoma presenting as hepatic rupture in a patient with long-term ingestion of arsenic.

Authors:  Sheng-Yow Ho; Chiang-Chin Tsai; Yi-Chang Tsai; How-Ran Guo
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Primary vascular tumours of the kidney.

Authors:  Ayo O Omiyale
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.