Literature DB >> 31410251

The presence of a cryptic barrier in the West Pacific Ocean suggests the effect of glacial climate changes on a widespread sea-dispersed plant, Vigna marina (Fabaceae).

Takashi Yamamoto1,2, Yoshiaki Tsuda3, Koji Takayama4,5, Reiko Nagashima6, Yoichi Tateishi7, Tadashi Kajita1,2.   

Abstract

Ocean currents are an important driver of evolution for sea-dispersed plants, enabling them to maintain reciprocal gene flow via sea-dispersed diaspores and obtain wide distribution ranges. Although geographic barriers are known to be the primary factors shaping present genetic structure of sea-dispersed plants, cryptic barriers which form clear genetic structure within oceanic regions are poorly understood. To test the presence of a cryptic barrier, we conducted a phylogeographic study together with past demographic inference for a widespread sea-dispersed plant, Vigna marina, using 308 individuals collected from the entire Indo-West Pacific (IWP) region. Chloroplast DNA variation showed strong genetic structure that separated populations into three groups: North Pacific (NP), South Pacific (SP) and Indian Ocean (IN) (F'CT among groups = 0.954-1.000). According to the Approximate Bayesian computation inference, splitting time between NP and SP was approximately 20,200 years (95%HPD, 4,530-95,400) before present. Moreover, a signal of recent population expansion was detected in the NP group. This study clearly showed the presence of a cryptic barrier in the West Pacific region of the distributional range of V. marina. The locations of the cryptic barrier observed in V. marina corresponded to the genetic breaks found in other plants, suggesting the presence of a common cryptic barrier for sea-dispersed plants. Demographic inference suggested that genetic structure related to this cryptic barrier has been present since the last glacial maximum and may reflect patterns of past population expansion from refugia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  approximate Bayesian computation; demographic history; long distance dispersal; pantropical plants with sea‐drifted seeds; phylogeography; refugia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31410251      PMCID: PMC6686344          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


INTRODUCTION

Oceans are important corridors for estuarine and coastal plant species as they enable the exchange of individuals and help to maintain genetic uniformity with remote populations across distributional ranges. Many plant species growing in coastal environments produce diaspores (mainly seeds and fruits) specifically adapted to long distance dispersal (LDD, Cain, Milligan, & Strand, 2000) by ocean currents (Ridley, 1930). As oceanic dispersal (sea‐dispersal) is often the most effective mode of long distance seed dispersal (Harwell & Orth, 2002), many sea‐dispersed plants have extremely wide distributional ranges in the tropics and subtropics worldwide (Tomlinson, 1986). Thus, low genetic differentiation among populations could be expected due to their extended gene flow by LDD of diaspores across the distributional range (Kudoh & Whigham, 1997; Nilsson, Brown, Jansson, & Merritt, 2010). For example, genetic variation in not only maternally inherited chloroplast DNA (Takayama, Kajita, Murata, & Tateishi, 2006) but also bi‐parentally inherited nuclear DNA (Takayama, Tateishi, Murata, & Kajita, 2008) showed an absence of population differentiation between the Pacific and Indian Oceans in Hibiscus tiliaceus, suggesting high gene flow among populations and the absence of genetic barriers across their distribution. Alternatively, it has been suggested that LDD of sea‐dispersed plants is more limited than initially expected due to land and water barriers as well as the mobility and survival of diaspores during dispersal (Duke, Lo, & Sun, 2002; Triest, 2008). Indeed, clear genetic structure across land masses has been observed in certain mangroves (e.g. see a review by Triest, 2008). For example, recent studies clarified that the Malay Peninsula acts as a genetic barrier in Bruguiera gymnorhiza (Minobe et al., 2010; Urashi, Teshima, Minobe, Koizumi, & Inomata, 2013) and Ceriops tagal (Huang et al., 2012), and that the Central American Isthmus is a genetic barrier in Hibiscus pernambucensis and Rhizophora mangle (Takayama et al., 2006; Takayama, Tamura, Tateishi, Webb, & Kajita, 2013). Even when no clear land barrier exists, clear genetic structures were reported for mangrove species of Rhizophora (Takayama et al., 2013) as well as Avicennia (Mori, Zucchi, & Souza, 2015), in which the South Equatorial Current likely acted as a barrier to shape genetic structure in the Atlantic region. Recent studies have reported genetic structure within oceanic regions where no apparent barriers exist, suggesting that inconspicuous barriers in the marine environment may exist (Duke et al., 2002). For example, Wee et al. (2015) detected clear genetic differentiation between South East Asian (Japan, Vietnam, Philippine and Indonesia) and Oceanian (Fiji, Vanuatu and New Caledonia) populations in Rhizophora stylosa and Guo et al. (2016) detected similar genetic structure in Rhizophora apiculata. As the locations of these genetic breaks might correspond to the boundaries of oceanic currents, Wee et al. (2015) suggested that oceanic circulation patterns might have acted as “cryptic barriers.” However, the presence of cryptic barriers has not yet been well examined. Firstly, previous studies (Guo et al., 2016; Wee et al., 2015) did not cover the entire species distributional range and the species studied by them are not widely distributed across the Indo‐West Pacific (IWP) region, which is one of the main biogeographical regions for mangroves. Extensive and detailed sampling is needed to test the presence of cryptic barriers, especially in the West Pacific region (sensu Wee et al., 2015). Additionally, extensive sampling may enable the evaluation of the strength of cryptic barriers in comparison to known geographical barriers (land barriers). For a deeper understanding of the process by which genetic structure related to cryptic barriers is formed, a comparative approach is required. Secondly, to understand cryptic barriers in detail, it is important to consider past population demography, such as past distribution changes, land barriers, LDD and ocean circulation, in addition to examining population genetic structure. Although the past demographic history of sea‐dispersed plants has not yet been well examined, recent advances in population genetics with approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) enable a deeper understanding of the past demographic dynamics of species, in terms of evolutionary parameters such as effective population size, time scale of divergence and population size change (Bertorelle, Benazzo, & Mona, 2010). By taking this approach we can deepen our understanding of the processes forming cryptic barriers. In this study, we focused on a widespread coastal legume Vigna marina (Burm.) Merr. that grows in tropical and subtropical sandy beaches throughout the tropics (Verdcourt, 1971). The species is ranked as one of the most widely distributed flowering plants (Padulosi & Ng, 1993) and also a member of a group of “pantropical plants with sea‐drifted seeds” (Miryeganeh, Takayama, Tateishi, & Kajita, 2014; Takayama et al., 2006; Vatanparast, Takayama, Sousa, Tateishi, & Kajita, 2011). Some adaptations for oceanic dispersal are recognized in this species, such as remarkable salt tolerance (Tomooka, Kaga, Isemura, & Vaughan, 2011), seed buoyancy and viability in sea water (Nakanishi, 1988). Indeed, this species has a wider distributional range than any other tree species of mangroves (e.g. B. gymnorhiza and R. stylosa) in the IWP region. Therefore, this species can be a model species to test the presence of cryptic barriers across the IWP region. Vigna marina has a subspecies, V. marina ssp. oblonga (Benth.) Padulosi, but we did not use it in this study as it is only distributed in West Africa and has been suggested to be not so closely related (genetically) to V. marina (Sonnante, Spinosa, Marangi, & Pignone, 1997). The aim of this study was to reveal the presence and process of formation of a cryptic barrier in Vigna marina in two ways: (a) to evaluate the genetic diversity and population genetic structure throughout the species distributional range using chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) and show if clear genetic structure caused by a cryptic barrier exists within the west Pacific region, and (b) to infer the past demographic history of V. marina in this region using the ABC approach to assess the processes of formation of the cryptic barrier that shaped the genetic structure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant sampling and DNA extraction

We sampled Vigna marina in thirty‐four localities and the sample size at each location ranged from one to 31 individuals, with a total sample size of 308 individuals (Supporting Information Table S1). To avoid sampling closely related individuals, each individual was selected randomly and separated from each other by at least 10 m. Collected leaf samples were dried by silica gel prior to DNA extraction. For the following data analyses, we treated some closely situated locations (< ca. 100 km) as a single location, resulting in a total of 21 locations (Table 1). Genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaf tissue using the cethyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) based extraction method (Doyle & Doyle, 1987).
Table 1

Locality, sample size (N), and values of the genetic diversity parameters: numbers of observed haplotype (S), haplotype diversity (H) and nucleotide diversity (π) in 21 populations of Vigna marina

Oceanic region (SAMOVA group)CodeLocalityLongitudeLatitude N S H π (×10−3)Tajima's D Fu and Li's D Fu and Li's F
Pacific Ocean
North Pacific (NP)207240.8331.350−0.963−1.017−1.197
JAJapan (Amami I. & Tokunoshima I.)E129.086316N27.9730831070.9111.850−0.163−0.406−0.389
JOJapan (Ogasawara Is.)E142.142472N26.6981111610.0000.000NANANA
JRJapan (Ryukyu I.)E128.090947N26.5348423150.7292.0402.523*1.405*2.049**
JIJapan (Iriomote I.)E123.790643N24.321466640.8001.840−0.943−0.913−0.995
TWTaiwanE120.876635N22.0092361130.3450.230−0.778−0.330−0.494
HWU.S.A. (Hawaii Is.)W158.204428N21.581600710.0000.000NANANA
GUU.S.A. (Guam I.)E144.716608N13.3228932630.5320.9800.5381.2821.236
PHPhilippineE122.225980N11.7944701230.3180.150−1.451−1.720−1.865
PAPalauE134.628875N7.5965141450.7030.790−1.451−1.720−1.865
MPMicronesia (Pohnpei I.)E158.205440N6.9762703050.6601.000−0.0790.2040.137
MKMicronesia (Kosrae I.)E163.020939N5.3460193170.7351.7200.8711.470*1.504
SASamoaW171.45024S14.045971320.1540.070−1.149−1.365−1.481
South Pacific (SP)7750.2960.970−0.1060.1690.088
AUAustraliaE145.466567S16.08850711NANANA
THFrench Polynesia (Tahiti I.)W149.369021S17.6999753420.3711.5101.5601.3641.669
VUVanuatuE168.443333S17.816667510.0000.000NANANA
FJFijiE178.008467S18.1675921220.1670.680−2.016**−2.494**−2.692**
TOTongaW175.17111S21.2566101130.4910.900−2.011**−2.428**−2.627**
NCNew CaledoniaE166.951461S22.1667801410.0000.000NANANA
Indian Ocean
Indian Ocean (IN)2410.0000.000NANANA
MMMyanmarE95.310138N15.9619291010.0000.000NANANA
SCSeychellesE55.431250S4.6151111110.0000.000NANANA
MZMozambiqueE32.651420S25.911630310.0000.000NANANA
Total308290.8641.870

Tajima's D (Tajima, 1989), and Fu and Li's F and D (Fu & Li, 1993) were calculated for populations with cpDNA variations (NA = not analyzed, *p < 0.10, **p < 0.02). We treated some closely located populations (

Locality, sample size (N), and values of the genetic diversity parameters: numbers of observed haplotype (S), haplotype diversity (H) and nucleotide diversity (π) in 21 populations of Vigna marina Tajima's D (Tajima, 1989), and Fu and Li's F and D (Fu & Li, 1993) were calculated for populations with cpDNA variations (NA = not analyzed, *p < 0.10, **p < 0.02). We treated some closely located populations (
Figure 1

The definition of the three populations tested in ABC1 using DIYABC. (a) Results of the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) and pairwise F′CT value among three groups. (b) The population Neighbor‐joining (NJ) tree reconstructed on a topographic map. Each branch was colored based on the results of SAMOVA (Pop1 = orange, Pop2 = blue, Pop3 = green). (c) The seven scenarios tested in ABC1 and the summary of the estimated parameters of the most‐likely scenario (= scenario 2). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations (Pop1, 2, 3, “a” before divergence) during the relevant time period (e.g. 0–t1, t1–t2)

Molecular markers

PCR amplifications were performed using three cpDNA universal primer pairs; trnT‐trnL IGS (Taberlet, Gielly, Pautou, & Bouvet, 1991), psbB‐psbH IGS (Shinozaki et al., 1986) and psbD‐trnT IGS (Tun & Yamaguchi, 2008). TaKaRa ExTaq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Bio) and Mighty AmpTM DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Bio) were used for PCR. After purifying the PCR products using illustra ExoProStar (General Electric Company), the PCR products were sequenced directly using an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), an ABI 3130 xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) or a DNA sequence service supplied by Eurofins MWG operon company (Ebersberg, Germany). The DNA sequences were aligned using MUSCLE as implemented in MEGA ver. 6.0 (Tamura, Stecher, Peterson, Filipski, & Kumar, 2013) and manually edited to improve alignment. A total of 308 individuals were sequenced and representative cpDNA haplotype sequences of V. marina were registered in Genbank (accessions: LC270330–LC270363). For the following analyses, we removed all sequence gaps by using TRIMAI ver. 1.3 (Capella‐Gutiérrez, Silla‐Martínez, & Gabaldón, 2009) and used 2,212 bp in total.

Genetic diversity, phylogeny and population structure

The haplotype diversity (H), nucleotide diversity (π), Tajima's D (Tajima, 1989), and Fu and Li's F and D (Fu & Li, 1993) were calculated over all locations, for each of the three SAMOVA groups (see below) and for each location separately using the program DNASP ver. 5.10 (Librado & Rozas, 2009). The haplotype network was constructed and edited using the statistical parsimony procedure implemented in NETWORK ver. 4.613 (www.fluxus-engineering.com) following the median‐joining method (Bandelt, Forster, & Röhl, 1999). To evaluate population group structure, we used the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA; Dupanloup, Schneider, & Excoffier, 2002) algorithm. SAMOVA is based on a simulated annealing procedure that aims to maximize the F CT and the proportion of total genetic variance due to differences between groups of populations in an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), and to define groups of populations that are geographically homogeneous and maximally differentiated from each other. Here, the algorithm was performed by SAMOVA software (Dupanloup et al., 2002), which detected the number, K, of groups giving the largest F CT value. The K was user‐defined and set between two and five with 500 independent simulated annealing processes in each run. Pairwise genetic differentiation described as F CT and its standardized value F'CT (Meirmans & Hedrick, 2011) were calculated for all possible pairs of SAMOVA groups using GENALEX 6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2012). To evaluate genetic relationships among populations, we reconstructed a neighbor‐joining (NJ) tree based on genetic distance (D A) (Nei, Tajima, & Tateno, 1983) among populations and tested the statistical confidence of the NJ tree topology based on 1,000 bootstraps using Populations 1.2.30 beta software (Langella, 2007). The NJ tree was reconstructed on a topographic map using GeoMapApp (http://www.geomapapp.org/; Ryan et al., 2009) and GenGIS2 (Parks et al., 2009).

Inference past demographic history

The software DIYABC ver. 2.0 (Cornuet et al., 2008,2014) was used to determine population demography based on the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) approach. We subdivided the analysis into “Infer population demographic history” (ABC1) and “Infer population size change in the North Pacific group” (ABC2). To simplify the scenarios in the ABC analysis, we defined three populations based on the result of SAMOVA: North Pacific group (NP), South Pacific group (SP) and Indian Ocean group (IN) (Figure 1a). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations (Pop1, 2, 3, “a” before divergence) during the relevant time period (e.g. 0–t1, t1–t2). The definition of the three populations tested in ABC1 using DIYABC. (a) Results of the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) and pairwise F′CT value among three groups. (b) The population Neighbor‐joining (NJ) tree reconstructed on a topographic map. Each branch was colored based on the results of SAMOVA (Pop1 = orange, Pop2 = blue, Pop3 = green). (c) The seven scenarios tested in ABC1 and the summary of the estimated parameters of the most‐likely scenario (= scenario 2). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations (Pop1, 2, 3, “a” before divergence) during the relevant time period (e.g. 0–t1, t1–t2)

ABC1: Infer population demographic history

To evaluate the demographic history of the three SAMOVA groups, we tested seven simple population divergence scenarios (Figure 1c). The scenarios were as follows: Scenario 1—Simple split model: all three populations merged at the same time, namely t2. Scenario 2—Hierarchical split model: NP merged with SP at t1 and then with IN at t2. Scenario 3—Hierarchical split model: NP merged with IN at t1 and then with SP at t2. Scenario 4—Hierarchical split model: SP merged with NP at t1 and then with IN at t2. Scenario 5—Hierarchical split model: SP merged with IN at t1 and then with NP at t2. Scenario 6—Hierarchical split model: IN merged with NP at t1 and then with SP at t2. Scenario 7—Hierarchical split model: IN merged with SP at t1 and then with NP at t2. The default prior values were used for all parameters, including mutation rates, except for maximum values of effective population size (N1, N2, N3, Na) and maximum values of time scales (Supporting Information Table S2).

ABC2: Infer population size change in the North Pacific group

To examine the past transition of the effective population size of the North Pacific group (NP), which had enough haplotype diversity for within group demographic analysis, we tested three simple population demographic scenarios (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The three scenarios tested in ABC2 and the summary of the estimated parameters of the most‐likely scenario (= scenario 2). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations during the relevant time period

The three scenarios tested in ABC2 and the summary of the estimated parameters of the most‐likely scenario (= scenario 2). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations during the relevant time period The scenarios were as follows: Scenario 1—Constant model: effective population size of NP was constant at N1 from the present to the past. (Na = N1) Scenario 2—Expansion model: effective population size of NP changed from Na to N1 at t. (Na < N1) Scenario 3—Bottleneck model: effective population size of NP changed from Na to N1 at t. (Na > N1) We changed the priors of the maximum population size and the maximum values of time scale from 10,000 (default value) to 100,000 to obtain better posterior distributions based on the results from the pilot runs (Supporting Information Table S2). The mutation model was selected using the program JMODELTEST ver. 2.0 (Darriba, Taboada, Doallo, & Posada, 2012; Guindon & Gascuel, 2003). The number of haplotypes, the number of segregating sites, the mean of pairwise differences, the variance of pairwise differences, Tajima's D, the number of private segregating sites and the mean of numbers of the rarest nucleotide at segregating sites were used as summary statistics for each of the three populations. The number of haplotypes, the number of segregating sites, the mean of pairwise differences and F ST were used as the summary statistics for each of the population pairs. One million simulations were run for each scenario in both ABC1 and 2. After all the simulations had been run, the most‐likely scenario was determined by comparing the posterior probabilities using the logistic regression method. The goodness of fit of the scenario was assessed by the option ‘“model checking”’ with principal component analysis (PCA) in DIYABC, which measures the discrepancy between model and real data.

RESULTS

Genetic diversity and population structure

In total, 29 haplotypes were detected and high levels of genetic diversity (haplotype diversity, H = 0.864 and nucleotide diversity, π = 1.870 × 10−3) were observed throughout the species distributional range (Table 1). The haplotype diversity, H, ranged from 0.000 to 0.911 and the nucleotide diversity, π, ranged from 0.000 to 2.040 × 10−3. High values of haplotype and nucleotide diversity were mostly observed in the North‐West Pacific populations and in contrast, low diversities were mostly observed in the South Pacific and Indian Ocean populations. The Fiji and Tonga populations showed significantly negative values of Tajima's D, and Li and Fu's D and F, which (assuming the neutrality of examined regions of cpDNA) indicate recent population expansion in this region. In contrast, significantly positive values were observed in the Ryukyu population suggesting a recent bottleneck, possibly due to this population being located near to northern margin of the species distributional range. For the NP and SP groups, although no significant signal of population expansion or contraction was detected based on Tajima's D, and Li and Fu's D and F indexes, the ABC2 inference showed significant signal of population expansion in the NP group (see below). The median‐joining network showed the phylogenetic relationship among the 29 haplotypes and grouped them into at least two star‐shaped haplotype groups: CP1 and CP2 (Figure 3). These star‐shaped groups were composed of a few, frequently observed haplotypes (H8 and H16) at the center of networks and several, rare, local satellite haplotypes, suggesting recent population expansion (Avise, 2000). These group structures also reflected the geographic distribution of haplotypes (Figure 4). Most of the haplotypes belonging to CP1 were observed in the North Pacific populations and most of the haplotypes belonging CP2 were observed in the South Pacific region. Despite high levels of haplotype diversity being observed throughout the Pacific populations, all three Indian Ocean populations were fixed for only a single haplotype (H29) located just one step distance from the CP1 cluster.
Figure 3

Median‐joining cpDNA haplotype network for V. marina. Each circle represents a single cpDNA haplotype and the size of the circle corresponds to the number of individuals

Figure 4

Geographic distribution of 29 cpDNA haplotypes. The size of the circle represents the sample size of the population

Median‐joining cpDNA haplotype network for V. marina. Each circle represents a single cpDNA haplotype and the size of the circle corresponds to the number of individuals Geographic distribution of 29 cpDNA haplotypes. The size of the circle represents the sample size of the population The SAMOVA revealed the highest F CT value (0.547; p < 0.01) when the 21 populations were divided into K = 3 groups, composed of the North Pacific group (NP), South Pacific group (SP) and the Indian Ocean region (IN) (Figure 1a). The NJ tree also showed a similar pattern to the SAMOVA, revealing genetic differentiation among the three regions (Figure 1b, Supporting Information Figure S5). The pairwise F CT values among the three regions ranged from 0.375 to 0.802 and their standardized values, described as F'CT, showed higher levels of genetic differentiation (0.954–1.000; Figure 1a).

Inference of past demographic history

In ABC1, the highest value of posterior probability was presumed for scenario 2 (0.5100, 95%HPD: 0.4832–0.5368) and the 95%HPD did not overlap with those of the other scenarios. For scenario 2, the median values of effective population size of N1 (North Pacific), N2 (South Pacific), N3 (Indian Ocean) and Na (putative ancestral population) were 81,400 (95%CI: 52,600 – 99,400), 23,400 (95%CI: 3,640.00–76,600), 6,010 (95%CI: 271–27,900), and 37,400 (95%CI: 1,230–94,600), respectively. The median value of t1, the divergence time when SP split from NP was 9,170 (95%CI: 1,510–31,800) generations ago and that of t2, the divergence time when IN split from NP and SP was 38,200 (95%CI: 8,510–93,700) generations ago. These time scales of t1 and t2 converted into absolute time as 20,200 and 114,600 years ago assuming a generation time for V. marina of three years according to our field observations. The median values of the mean mutation rate of cpDNA and the median values of mean coefficient k C/T were estimated as 2.92 × 10−8 (95%CI: 1.51 × 10−8–5.50 × 10−8) and 11.50 (95%CI: 8.15 × 10−1–2.00 × 101), respectively (Supporting Information Figure S1 and Table S3). The estimated values of 39 summary statistics did not show significant differences between the observed and simulated data based on the posterior distributions (Supporting Information Table S4). The PCA showed that the observed data were located around the center of the cluster of points of the simulated data based on the posterior distributions (Supporting Information Figure S2), suggesting that scenario 2 was a good fit for the observed data. In ABC2, the highest value of posterior probability was presumed for scenario 2 (population expansion model; 0.4766, 95%HPD: 0.4708–0.4824) and its posterior probability did not overlap and was much higher than that for scenario 1 (constant population size model; PP = 0.2928, 95%CI: 0.2875–0.2981) and scenario 3 (bottleneck model; PP = 0.2306, 95%CI: 0.2257–0.2355) (Table 2). The median values of the effective population size of N1 (current populations of North Pacific) and Na (putative ancestral population) were 64,900 (95%CI: 26,900–98,400) and 29,800 (95%CI: 1,290–79,900), respectively. The median value of t, time scale when population expansion occurred, was 40,200 (95%CI: 2,320–96,500) generations ago, which converted into absolute time as 98,100 years ago. The median values of the mean mutation rate of cpDNA and the median values of mean coefficient k C/T were estimated as 4.96 × 10−8 (95%CI: 2.32 × 10−8–9.39 × 10−8) and 11.40 (95%CI: 7.81 × 10−1–1.99 × 101), respectively (Supporting Information Figure S3 and Table S3). The estimated values of eight summary statistics did not show significant differences between the observed and simulated data based on the posterior distributions (Supporting Information Table S4). The PCA suggested that scenario 2 was a good fit for the observed data (Supporting Information Figure S4).
Table 2

Posterior probability of each scenario and its 95% confidence interval based on the logistic estimate by DIYABC

ScenarioPosterior probability95% CI (lower–upper)
ABC1
10.06810.0000–0.1528
20.51000.4832–0.5368
30.01370.0000–0.0864
40.38610.3609–0.4114
50.01090.0000–0.0838
60.00760.0000–0.0809
70.00350.0000–0.0772
ABC2
10.29280.2875–0.2981
20.47660.4708–0.4824
30.23060.2257–0.2355
Posterior probability of each scenario and its 95% confidence interval based on the logistic estimate by DIYABC

DISCUSSION

Presence of a cryptic barrier in the West Pacific

This study clearly showed strong genetic structure within the distributional range of the widespread sea‐dispersed plant V. marina. The clear genetic break observed in the West Pacific where no geographic barrier exists suggests the presence of a cryptic barrier that prevents seed‐mediated gene flow. The genetic clustering analyses (SAMOVA and population NJ tree) showed clear genetic structure that divides the distributional range of V. marina into three regional clusters: North Pacific (NP), South Pacific (SP) and Indian Ocean (IN) (Figures 1a,b and 4). The haplotype composition of the NP and SP regions were almost completely different and F' CT values among all three regions were high (0.954–1.000), suggesting very limited gene flow among regions. In addition, potential patterns of admixture between the NP and SP regions were found only in the populations located near to the boundary of the two genetic clusters. Finally, the median‐joining network showed that the two major groups of haplotypes, CP1 (NP) and CP2 (SP), were phylogenetically differentiated from each other. On the other hand, most of the major haplotypes were highly shared among populations within each of the NP or SP clusters, suggesting substantial gene flow among populations within each genetic cluster. In addition, the AMOVA suggested only a low proportion of variation was due to differences among populations within clusters (9.17%; Table 3). These results imply that despite V. marina having the ability for LDD, gene flow between the NP and SP regions has been historically prevented even though no geographical barrier exists.
Table 3

Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) performed considering the three cpDNA population groups defined in the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA; Dupanloup et al., 2002)

Source of variation df Sum of squaresVariance componentsPercentage of variation
Among groups2246.7991.59854.73
Among populations within groups1887.2150.2689.17
Within populations287302.5061.05436.10
Total307636.5192.912
Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) performed considering the three cpDNA population groups defined in the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA; Dupanloup et al., 2002) Interestingly, the level of genetic differentiation in V. marina across the West Pacific cryptic barrier is as strong as across the Malay Peninsula region (F' CT = 0.954 to 1.000; Figure 1a). This highlights that cryptic barriers should be recognized as just as important as other geographic barriers when evaluating the phylogeographic history and genetic diversity of V. marina. Generally, the Malay Peninsula is one of the most important present and historical geographical barriers (Duke et al., 2002; Voris, 2000) forming current patterns of phylogeographic structure and genetic diversity in several mangroves (Duke et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2012; Urashi et al., 2013) and other marine species (Alfaro, Karns, Voris, Abernathy, & Sellins, 2004; Gaither et al., 2011) distributed in the Indo‐West Pacific (IWP) region. The current data suggests that in addition to the well‐recognized geographic barrier of the Malay Peninsula, the cryptic barrier in the West Pacific has also strongly affected the phylogeographic structure and genetic diversity of the widespread sea‐dispersed plant V. marina. A clear genetic break in the West Pacific Ocean has also been observed in some other sea‐dispersed plants: Rhizophora stylosa (Wee et al., 2015), R. apiculata (Guo et al., 2016), Xylocarpus granatum (Tomizawa et al., 2017) and Sonneratia alba (Wee et al., 2017), and in these cases the locations of the genetic breaks roughly corresponded to the one determined for V. marina. The presence of common genetic structure in multiple widespread sea‐dispersed species indicates the presence of a common cryptic barrier. Generally, widespread sea‐dispersed plants, including mangroves and “pantropical plants with sea‐drifted seeds” (Takayama et al., 2006), often have common genetic structures because they usually share some ecological features (such as habitat, species distribution, seed dispersal strategy) and phylogeographic history. These species are also likely to share common divergence histories relating to geographic and cryptic barriers. In this study, the ABC approach was employed to elucidate the historical processes that formed the clear genetic structure related to the West Pacific cryptic barrier observed in V. marina. Although these inferences merely represent the population demographic history relating to V. marina, they may also reflect common historical processes shared by multiple widespread sea‐dispersed plants distributed in the IWP region.

Formation of a cryptic barrier in V. marina

The demographic inference estimated that the splitting time between the NP and SP was 20,200 years (6,740 generations) before present (BP), corresponding to the period of the Last Glacial Maximum (21,000 years BP). This suggests that a cryptic barrier for V. marina was already present during the last glacial period. During the Quaternary period, glacial climate changes had drastic and complex effects on the distribution of tropical coastal species, for example, modifying the geography of coastlines and ocean current patterns, changing habitats, and inducing the contraction of species distributional ranges. Indeed, drastic sea level drop (~120 m in the Last Glacial Maxima: LGM) and subsequent landmass formation over large areas have been reported in South East Asia (Sunda shelf) and the Oceania region (Sahul shelf) (Voris, 2000). These landmass formations would have separated the distributional range of sea‐dispersed plants both directly and indirectly (via the modification of ocean currents), resulting in the restriction of seed‐mediated gene flow and population differentiation. Additionally, historical adaptation to multiple environments could also explain the observed population subdivision. Although it is difficult to elucidate which factor(s) formed the clear genetic break in the West Pacific distributional range of sea‐dispersed plants, this study suggests that genetic structure relating to the cryptic barrier has been maintained since the LGM. A signal of recent population expansion was detected in the North Pacific cluster by ABC, and in two populations (Fiji and Tonga) in the South Pacific based on Tajima's D and Fu and Li's D and F, suggesting past population expansion of V. marina from glacial refugia after the LGM. Cannon, Morley, and Bush (2009) recently reported that the major refugia of lowland coastal plants and mangroves was in the South China Sea during the LGM period. It is well kwon that richness of alleles or haplotypes is expected to be higher in refugial areas than areas recolonized after the glacial period (Comps, Gömöry, Letouzey, Thiébaut, & Petit, 2001; Petit et al., 2003). Indeed, North Pacific populations (especially in South East Asia) of Vigna marina had much higher haplotype richness compared to other populations, implying that the genetic structure observed in V. marina may reflect the geographic patterns of refugia that existed during the LGM. Taking this information into account, we have an idea about the phylogeographic process of wide spread sea‐dispersed plants. Although LDD by sea‐dispersed seeds connected populations within the distribution range, contraction of the species distribution during the LGM caused population subdivision into at least two regions, possibly the South China Sea and the South Pacific Ocean, resulting in some fixed haplotype differences in each region. After the last glacial period, the South China Sea population expanded into the South Pacific Ocean, and may have had secondary contact with South Pacific haplotypes in the Oceania region. Indeed, the Samoa population was solely assigned to the NP group, unlike its neighboring populations, and multiple NP populations have CP2 haplotypes, which indicate recent LDD events between the NP and SP groups. As this study demonstrates, the present phylogeographic structure of widespread sea‐dispersed plants has been more strongly influenced by glacial climate change than previously expected. For many widespread forest plants in temperate regions, glacial climate change is one of the key factors that shaped genetic structure via contraction to glacial refugia at the LGM and subsequent population expansion (reviewed in Hewitt, 2000; Provan & Bennett, 2008). For widespread sea‐dispersed plants in tropical regions, the influence of glacial climate change has been less expected, due to their extremely high ability for LDD that may easily homogenize populations by sea‐dispersed seeds, and also because the locations of refugia have not been clear for tropical plants. The findings of this study, as well as other recent ones using molecular markers and the ABC approach, provided evidence suggesting the presence of cryptic barriers in the West Pacific (for example, Xylocarpus granatum (Tomizawa et al., 2017); Sonneratia alba (Wee et al., 2017)) in relation to the LGM. These findings suggest that not only the widespread temperate forest plants, but also the sea‐dispersed tropical plants have been influenced by glacial climate change. By studying other sea‐dispersal plants in the same way, and also by using higher resolution markers such as multi‐locus nuclear DNA, we may obtain further support for this idea. In this study, ABC analyses explored the population demographic history in relation to refugia during LGM or the past ice age previous to the LGM. Although statistical uncertainty remains (e.g., time scale, generation time, broad 95% CI range and assumed model, reviewed in detail see Tsuda, Nakao, Ide, & Tsumura, 2015), the ABC inferences used in this study were useful to explore the processes by which the cryptic barrier in widespread sea‐dispersed plants is formed. Regarding the model assumed in the ABC, DIYABC does not consider gene flow after divergence, and it may bias the inferred temporal parameters (Tsuda et al., 2015). However, as discussed previously, genetic differentiation among the examined regions was quite high (F′ CT = 0.954 to 1.000), suggesting highly restricted gene flow among them. Thus, as far as the demographic history among the three regional groups is concerned, the bias in this study is likely limited. In addition, as gene flow after divergence wasn't considered, divergence times might have been underestimated (Tsuda et al., 2015). However, the main discussion here would not be changed, with the population split still occurring before the LGM.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the presence of a cryptic barrier in the West Pacific distributional range of a widespread sea‐dispersed plant, V. marina, was clearly detected. The locations of the cryptic barrier observed in V. marina corresponded to the genetic breaks found in other plants, suggesting the presence of a common cryptic barrier for sea‐dispersed plants in the West Pacific region. Demographic inferences using the ABC approach suggested that genetic structure related to the cryptic barrier has been present since the last glacial period and may reflect patterns of past population expansion from refugia. These results suggest that despite high LDD ability that can homogenize genetic structure, present phylogeographic patterns of sea‐dispersed plants have been strongly affected by glacial climate changes, as reported in other land plants.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

T.Y., Y.Tsuda, K.T. and T.K. designed the study. T.Y., K.T., R.N., Y.Tateishi and T.K. carried out field collection. T.Y. and R.N. carried out the molecular work. T.Y., Y.Tsuda and R.N. analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper and all have approved of the final version. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  34 in total

1.  Diverging trends between heterozygosity and allelic richness during postglacial colonization in the European beech.

Authors:  B Comps; D Gömöry; J Letouzey; B Thiébaut; R J Petit
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages.

Authors:  G Hewitt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations.

Authors:  M L Cain; B G Milligan; A E Strand
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies.

Authors:  H J Bandelt; P Forster; A Röhl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations.

Authors:  I Dupanloup; S Schneider; L Excoffier
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Stéphane Guindon; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 7.  Phylogeographic insights into cryptic glacial refugia.

Authors:  Jim Provan; K D Bennett
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity.

Authors:  Rémy J Petit; Itziar Aguinagalde; Jacques-Louis de Beaulieu; Christiane Bittkau; Simon Brewer; Rachid Cheddadi; Richard Ennos; Silvia Fineschi; Delphine Grivet; Martin Lascoux; Aparajita Mohanty; Gerhard Müller-Starck; Brigitte Demesure-Musch; Anna Palmé; Juan Pedro Martín; Sarah Rendell; Giovanni G Vendramin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Phylogeography and genetic structure of Hibiscus tiliaceus--speciation of a pantropical plant with sea-drifted seeds.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Tadashi Kajita; Jin Murata; Yoichi Tateishi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Gene flow and population subdivision in a pantropical plant with sea-drifted seeds Hibiscus tiliaceus and its allied species: evidence from microsatellite analyses.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Yoichi Tateishi; Jin Murata; Tadashi Kajita
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contrasting Phylogeographic Patterns in Lumnitzera Mangroves Across the Indo-West Pacific.

Authors:  Wuxia Guo; Achyut Kumar Banerjee; Haidan Wu; Wei Lun Ng; Hui Feng; Sitan Qiao; Ying Liu; Yelin Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.