| Literature DB >> 31410251 |
Takashi Yamamoto1,2, Yoshiaki Tsuda3, Koji Takayama4,5, Reiko Nagashima6, Yoichi Tateishi7, Tadashi Kajita1,2.
Abstract
Ocean currents are an important driver of evolution for sea-dispersed plants, enabling them to maintain reciprocal gene flow via sea-dispersed diaspores and obtain wide distribution ranges. Although geographic barriers are known to be the primary factors shaping present genetic structure of sea-dispersed plants, cryptic barriers which form clear genetic structure within oceanic regions are poorly understood. To test the presence of a cryptic barrier, we conducted a phylogeographic study together with past demographic inference for a widespread sea-dispersed plant, Vigna marina, using 308 individuals collected from the entire Indo-West Pacific (IWP) region. Chloroplast DNA variation showed strong genetic structure that separated populations into three groups: North Pacific (NP), South Pacific (SP) and Indian Ocean (IN) (F'CT among groups = 0.954-1.000). According to the Approximate Bayesian computation inference, splitting time between NP and SP was approximately 20,200 years (95%HPD, 4,530-95,400) before present. Moreover, a signal of recent population expansion was detected in the NP group. This study clearly showed the presence of a cryptic barrier in the West Pacific region of the distributional range of V. marina. The locations of the cryptic barrier observed in V. marina corresponded to the genetic breaks found in other plants, suggesting the presence of a common cryptic barrier for sea-dispersed plants. Demographic inference suggested that genetic structure related to this cryptic barrier has been present since the last glacial maximum and may reflect patterns of past population expansion from refugia.Entities:
Keywords: approximate Bayesian computation; demographic history; long distance dispersal; pantropical plants with sea‐drifted seeds; phylogeography; refugia
Year: 2019 PMID: 31410251 PMCID: PMC6686344 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Locality, sample size (N), and values of the genetic diversity parameters: numbers of observed haplotype (S), haplotype diversity (H) and nucleotide diversity (π) in 21 populations of Vigna marina
| Oceanic region (SAMOVA group) | Code | Locality | Longitude | Latitude |
|
|
|
| Tajima's | Fu and Li's | Fu and Li's |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Ocean | |||||||||||
| North Pacific (NP) | 207 | 24 | 0.833 | 1.350 | −0.963 | −1.017 | −1.197 | ||||
| JA | Japan (Amami I. & Tokunoshima I.) | E129.086316 | N27.973083 | 10 | 7 | 0.911 | 1.850 | −0.163 | −0.406 | −0.389 | |
| JO | Japan (Ogasawara Is.) | E142.142472 | N26.698111 | 16 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| JR | Japan (Ryukyu I.) | E128.090947 | N26.534842 | 31 | 5 | 0.729 | 2.040 | 2.523* | 1.405* | 2.049** | |
| JI | Japan (Iriomote I.) | E123.790643 | N24.321466 | 6 | 4 | 0.800 | 1.840 | −0.943 | −0.913 | −0.995 | |
| TW | Taiwan | E120.876635 | N22.009236 | 11 | 3 | 0.345 | 0.230 | −0.778 | −0.330 | −0.494 | |
| HW | U.S.A. (Hawaii Is.) | W158.204428 | N21.581600 | 7 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| GU | U.S.A. (Guam I.) | E144.716608 | N13.322893 | 26 | 3 | 0.532 | 0.980 | 0.538 | 1.282 | 1.236 | |
| PH | Philippine | E122.225980 | N11.794470 | 12 | 3 | 0.318 | 0.150 | −1.451 | −1.720 | −1.865 | |
| PA | Palau | E134.628875 | N7.596514 | 14 | 5 | 0.703 | 0.790 | −1.451 | −1.720 | −1.865 | |
| MP | Micronesia (Pohnpei I.) | E158.205440 | N6.976270 | 30 | 5 | 0.660 | 1.000 | −0.079 | 0.204 | 0.137 | |
| MK | Micronesia (Kosrae I.) | E163.020939 | N5.346019 | 31 | 7 | 0.735 | 1.720 | 0.871 | 1.470* | 1.504 | |
| SA | Samoa | W171.45024 | S14.04597 | 13 | 2 | 0.154 | 0.070 | −1.149 | −1.365 | −1.481 | |
| South Pacific (SP) | 77 | 5 | 0.296 | 0.970 | −0.106 | 0.169 | 0.088 | ||||
| AU | Australia | E145.466567 | S16.088507 | 1 | 1 | — | — | NA | NA | NA | |
| TH | French Polynesia (Tahiti I.) | W149.369021 | S17.699975 | 34 | 2 | 0.371 | 1.510 | 1.560 | 1.364 | 1.669 | |
| VU | Vanuatu | E168.443333 | S17.816667 | 5 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| FJ | Fiji | E178.008467 | S18.167592 | 12 | 2 | 0.167 | 0.680 | −2.016** | −2.494** | −2.692** | |
| TO | Tonga | W175.17111 | S21.256610 | 11 | 3 | 0.491 | 0.900 | −2.011** | −2.428** | −2.627** | |
| NC | New Caledonia | E166.951461 | S22.166780 | 14 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| Indian Ocean | |||||||||||
| Indian Ocean (IN) | 24 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | ||||
| MM | Myanmar | E95.310138 | N15.961929 | 10 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| SC | Seychelles | E55.431250 | S4.615111 | 11 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| MZ | Mozambique | E32.651420 | S25.911630 | 3 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | NA | NA | NA | |
| Total | 308 | 29 | 0.864 | 1.870 | |||||||
Tajima's D (Tajima, 1989), and Fu and Li's F and D (Fu & Li, 1993) were calculated for populations with cpDNA variations (NA = not analyzed, *p < 0.10, **p < 0.02). We treated some closely located populations (
Figure 1The definition of the three populations tested in ABC1 using DIYABC. (a) Results of the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) and pairwise F′CT value among three groups. (b) The population Neighbor‐joining (NJ) tree reconstructed on a topographic map. Each branch was colored based on the results of SAMOVA (Pop1 = orange, Pop2 = blue, Pop3 = green). (c) The seven scenarios tested in ABC1 and the summary of the estimated parameters of the most‐likely scenario (= scenario 2). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations (Pop1, 2, 3, “a” before divergence) during the relevant time period (e.g. 0–t1, t1–t2)
Figure 2The three scenarios tested in ABC2 and the summary of the estimated parameters of the most‐likely scenario (= scenario 2). In all scenarios, t# represents time scale measured in number of generations and N# represents effective population size of the corresponding populations during the relevant time period
Figure 3Median‐joining cpDNA haplotype network for V. marina. Each circle represents a single cpDNA haplotype and the size of the circle corresponds to the number of individuals
Figure 4Geographic distribution of 29 cpDNA haplotypes. The size of the circle represents the sample size of the population
Posterior probability of each scenario and its 95% confidence interval based on the logistic estimate by DIYABC
| Scenario | Posterior probability | 95% CI (lower–upper) |
|---|---|---|
| ABC1 | ||
| 1 | 0.0681 | 0.0000–0.1528 |
| 2 | 0.5100 | 0.4832–0.5368 |
| 3 | 0.0137 | 0.0000–0.0864 |
| 4 | 0.3861 | 0.3609–0.4114 |
| 5 | 0.0109 | 0.0000–0.0838 |
| 6 | 0.0076 | 0.0000–0.0809 |
| 7 | 0.0035 | 0.0000–0.0772 |
| ABC2 | ||
| 1 | 0.2928 | 0.2875–0.2981 |
| 2 | 0.4766 | 0.4708–0.4824 |
| 3 | 0.2306 | 0.2257–0.2355 |
Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) performed considering the three cpDNA population groups defined in the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA; Dupanloup et al., 2002)
| Source of variation |
| Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 2 | 246.799 | 1.598 | 54.73 |
| Among populations within groups | 18 | 87.215 | 0.268 | 9.17 |
| Within populations | 287 | 302.506 | 1.054 | 36.10 |
| Total | 307 | 636.519 | 2.912 |