Literature DB >> 3140975

Lessons from an audit of unplanned pregnancies.

D Metson1.   

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of contraceptive use a two year audit of pregnant women registered in one group practice was carried out. The methods of contraception used by women with unplanned pregnancies were studied and the rates of failure assessed. Of the 518 pregnancies during the study, 187 (36%) were unplanned. Unplanned pregnancies were most common in the 15-19 age group (54 out of 187), and women aged under 25 used contraceptives less reliably than women aged 25 and over. The combined pill was the most effective method of contraception in all age groups. The methods that resulted in most unplanned pregnancies were the sheath in women aged 25 and over and incorrect use of oral contraceptive or no contraception in those aged under 25. The fear of side effects was an important reason why women did not use the combined pill, being cited by 22 out of 134 women, and inappropriate medical advice was cited by a further 20 women. More discussion between doctors and patients and readily available information on the use of oral contraceptives might help to reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Methods Chosen; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; England; Europe; Family Planning; Fertility; Northern Europe; Population; Population At Risk; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Reproduction; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Surveys; United Kingdom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3140975      PMCID: PMC1834447          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of different contraceptive methods.

Authors:  M Vessey; M Lawless; D Yeates
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Oral contraceptives and breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  B V Stadel; G L Rubin; L A Webster; J J Schlesselman; P A Wingo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Social class, religion and contraceptive failure in a sample of pregnant women in Brisbane.

Authors:  J M Najman; J D Keeping; J Morrison; J S Western; G M Williams
Journal:  Community Health Stud       Date:  1984

4.  Contraceptive use, pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes among U.S. women.

Authors:  J G Dryfoos
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr

5.  Contraceptive behaviour and fertility patterns in an inner London group practice.

Authors:  P C Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1980-06
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Unintended pregnancies and contraceptive use.

Authors:  D Metson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

2.  Raising standards in family planning services.

Authors:  S Rowlands
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Factors affecting the use of folic acid supplements in pregnant women in Glasgow.

Authors:  E McGovern; H Moss; G Grewal; A Taylor; S Bjornsson; J Pell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Information leaflets on contraception.

Authors:  D Metson; G C Kassianos; D P Norman; J Moriarty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Teenage pregnancy: a comparative study of teenagers choosing termination of pregnancy or antenatal care.

Authors:  V A Pearson; M R Owen; D R Phillips; D J Gray; M N Marshall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Natural family planning. ...and empowers couples.

Authors:  G Jarvis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.