| Literature DB >> 31409330 |
Wei-Min Ma1, Hui Zhang2, Neng-Li Wang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long waiting times result in low satisfaction. Although several methods are used to shorten the actual waiting time (AWT) in large hospitals of China, the outpatients still have a long actual waiting time. This study aimed to explore whether satisfaction could be improved by extending the expected waiting time (EWT) instead of shortening the AWT.Entities:
Keywords: Actual waiting time; Expected waiting time; Prospect theory; Satisfaction score; Unfavorable information
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31409330 PMCID: PMC6693195 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4408-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Six different conditions of the experiment
| Conditions | Subjects | EWT a | AWT | Mimic conditions b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control group | T0 = 1.5 h | – | Ta = 3.0 h | T0 < Ta |
| 2 | Control group | T0 = 1.5 h | – | Ta = 2.0 h | T0 < Ta |
| 3 | Control group | T0 = 1.5 h | – | Ta = 1.0 h | T0 > Ta |
| 4 | Experimental group | T0 = 1.5 h | T1 = 2.5 h | Ta = 3.0 h | T0 < T1 < Ta |
| 5 | Experimental group | T0 = 1.5 h | T1 = 2.5 h | Ta = 2.0 h | T0 < Ta < T1 |
| 6 | Experimental group | T0 = 1.5 h | T1 = 2.5 h | Ta = 1.0 h | Ta < T0 < T1 |
EWT Expected waiting time, AWT Actual waiting time (Ta); T0, initial EWT; T1, second EWT; −, no data
aEWT was defined to be prolonged 1.0 h by unfavorable information
bT0, T1 and Ta were presented to mimic a hypothetical situation
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects
| Control group ( | Experimental group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 37 (31.1%) | 32 (28.1%) |
| Female | 82 (68.9%) | 82 (71.9%) |
| Age (M [Q25, Q75]) (years) | 18 [18, 19] a | 18 [18, 19] a |
| Hospital visit history | ||
| Yes | 81 (68.1%) | 68 (59.6%) |
| No | 38 (31.9%) | 46 (40.4%) |
| Expected waiting time (EWT) | ||
| Before UI was given | 120.0 [60.0, 150.0] a | 121.0 [90.0, 210.0] a |
| After UI was given | – | 180.0 [120.0, 240.0] a |
UI Unfavorable information; -, no data
aData normality was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Shapiro-Wilk test, P < 0.05
Extension of expected waiting time (EWT) in the experimental group
| N | ≤0 min | 1–60 min | 61–120 min | ≥ 121 min | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total individuals | 114 | 18 (15.8%) | 45 (39.5%) | 37 (32.5%) | 14 (12.3%) |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 32 | 5 (15.6%) | 18 (56.3%) | 6 (18.8%) | 3 (9.4%) |
| Female | 82 | 13 (15.9%) | 27 (32.9%) * | 31 (37.8%) | 11 (13.4%) |
| Hospital visit history | |||||
| Yes | 68 | 10 (14.7%) | 25 (36.8%) | 25 (36.8%) | 8 (11.8%) |
| No | 46 | 8 (17.4%) | 20 (43.5%) | 12 (26.1%) | 6 (13.0%) |
* Ratios were compared between males and females, P < 0.05
Satisfaction scores in the control and experimental groups
| Conditions a | Control group | Experimental group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Score | Case | Score | |
| T0 = 1.5 h (T1 = 2.5 h) and Ta = 1.0 h | 41 | 76.5 ± 19.9 b | 37 | 80.9 ± 15.6 b |
| T0 = 1.5 h (T1 = 2.5 h) and Ta = 2.0 h | 40 | 50.1 ± 22.7 | 44 | 66.7 ± 19.9 c |
| T0 = 1.5 h (T1 = 2.5 h) and Ta = 3.0 h | 38 | 38.0 ± 22.7 | 33 | 41.9 ± 22.7 |
T0, expected waiting time (EWT) before unfavorable information (UI) was given; T1, EWT after UI was given; Ta, actual waiting time
aEWT was prolonged 1.0 h by UI in the experimental group (T1 = 2.5 h)
bData normality was tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P > 0.05, by the Shapiro-Wilk test, P < 0.05
cScores in the control group vs. scores in the experimental group, P < 0.05
The interval distribution of satisfaction scores in the control and experimental groups
| N | Very dissatisfied | Dissatisfied | Satisfied | Very satisfied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 = 1.5 h and Ta =1.0 h | |||||
| Control group | 41 | 1 (2.4%) | 2 (4.9%) | 17 (41.5%) | 21 (51.2%) |
| Experimental group (T1 = 2.5 h) | 37 | 1 (2.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (29.7%) | 25 (67.6%) |
| T0 = 1.5 h and Ta = 2.0 h | |||||
| Control group | 40 | 6 (15.0%) | 13 (32.5%) | 16 (40.0%) | 5 (12.5%) |
| Experimental group (T1 = 2.5 h) | 44 | 1 (2.3%) a | 9 (20.5%) | 19 (43.2%) | 15 (34.1%) a |
| T0 = 1.5 h and Ta = 3.0 h | |||||
| Control group | 38 | 17 (44.7%) | 10 (26.3%) | 9 (23.7%) | 2 (5.3%) |
| Experimental group (T1 = 2.5 h) | 33 | 7 (21.2%) a | 17 (51.5%) a | 7 (21.2%) | 2 (6.1%) |
aSatisfaction scores in control group vs. satisfaction scores in the experimental group, P < 0.05