Literature DB >> 31409248

The environmental predictors of spatio-temporal variation in the breeding phenology of a passerine bird.

Jack D Shutt1, Irene Benedicto Cabello1, Katharine Keogan1, David I Leech2, Jelmer M Samplonius1, Lorienne Whittle3, Malcolm D Burgess4,5, Albert B Phillimore1.   

Abstract

Establishing the cues or constraints that influence avian timing of breeding is the key to accurate prediction of future phenology. This study aims to identify the aspects of the environment that predict the timing of two measures of breeding phenology (nest initiation and egg laying date) in an insectivorous woodland passerine, the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). We analyse data collected from a 220 km, 40-site transect over 3 years and consider spring temperatures, tree leafing phenology, invertebrate availability and photoperiod as predictors of breeding phenology. We find that mean night-time temperature in early spring is the strongest predictor of both nest initiation and lay date and suggest this finding is most consistent with temperature acting as a constraint on breeding activity. Birch budburst phenology significantly predicts lay date additionally to temperature, either as a direct cue or indirectly via a correlated variable. We use cross-validation to show that our model accurately predicts lay date in two further years and find that similar variables predict lay date well across the UK national nest record scheme. This work refines our understanding of the principal factors influencing the timing of tit reproductive phenology and suggests that temperature may have both a direct and indirect effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus; constraints; cues; laying date; nest-box hole-nesting; trophic mismatch

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31409248      PMCID: PMC6710590          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Climate change and constraints on breeding.

Authors:  I R Stevenson; D M Bryant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Climate change, breeding date and nestling diet: how temperature differentially affects seasonal changes in pied flycatcher diet depending on habitat variation.

Authors:  Claudia Burger; Eugen Belskii; Tapio Eeva; Toni Laaksonen; Marko Mägi; Raivo Mänd; Anna Qvarnström; Tore Slagsvold; Thor Veen; Marcel E Visser; Karen L Wiebe; Chris Wiley; Jonathan Wright; Christiaan Both
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Dissecting the contributions of plasticity and local adaptation to the phenology of a butterfly and its host plants.

Authors:  Albert B Phillimore; Sandra Stålhandske; Richard J Smithers; Rodolphe Bernard
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Timing in a fluctuating environment: environmental variability and asymmetric fitness curves can lead to adaptively mismatched avian reproduction.

Authors:  Marjolein E Lof; Thomas E Reed; John M McNamara; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Passerines may be sufficiently plastic to track temperature-mediated shifts in optimum lay date.

Authors:  Albert B Phillimore; David I Leech; James W Pearce-Higgins; Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Predicting when climate-driven phenotypic change affects population dynamics.

Authors:  Nina McLean; Callum R Lawson; Dave I Leech; Martijn van de Pol
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Spring phenology does not affect timing of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Sonja V Schaper; Carolina Rueda; Peter J Sharp; Alistair Dawson; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Simultaneous pituitary-gonadal recrudescence in two Corsican populations of male blue tits with asynchronous breeding dates.

Authors:  S P Caro; M M Lambrechts; O Chastel; P J Sharp; D W Thomas; J Balthazart
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Anne Charmantier; Robin H McCleery; Lionel R Cole; Chris Perrins; Loeske E B Kruuk; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cue identification in phenology: A case study of the predictive performance of current statistical tools.

Authors:  Emily G Simmonds; Ella F Cole; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hatching phenology is lagging behind an advancing snowmelt pattern in a high-alpine bird.

Authors:  Christian Schano; Carole Niffenegger; Tobias Jonas; Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  From individual to population level: Temperature and snow cover modulate fledging success through breeding phenology in greylag geese (Anser anser).

Authors:  Didone Frigerio; Petra Sumasgutner; Kurt Kotrschal; Sonia Kleindorfer; Josef Hemetsberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.