Matthew S Stratton1,2, Rushita A Bagchi1,2, Marina B Felisbino1,2, Rachel A Hirsch3, Harrison E Smith3, Andrew S Riching1,2, Blake Y Enyart1,2, Keith A Koch1,2, Maria A Cavasin1,2, Michael Alexanian4, Kunhua Song1,2, Jun Qi5, Madeleine E Lemieux6, Deepak Srivastava4, Maggie P Y Lam1,2, Saptarsi M Haldar4,7,8, Charles Y Lin3, Timothy A McKinsey1,2. 1. From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (M.S.S., R.A.B., M.B.F., A.S.R., B.Y.E., K.A.K., M.A.C., K.S., M.P.Y.L., T.A.M.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 2. Consortium for Fibrosis Research & Translation (M.S.S., R.A.B., M.B.F., A.S.R., B.Y.E., K.A.K., M.A.C., K.S., M.P.Y.L., T.A.M.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. 3. Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.A.H., H.E.S., C.Y.L.). 4. Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, San Francisco, CA (M.A., D.S., S.M.H.). 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (J.Q.). 6. Bioinfo, Plantagenet, ON, Canada (M.E.L.). 7. Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA (S.M.H.). 8. Cardiometabolic Disorders, Amgen, San Francisco, CA (S.M.H.).
Abstract
RATIONALE: Small molecule inhibitors of the acetyl-histone binding protein BRD4 have been shown to block cardiac fibrosis in preclinical models of heart failure (HF). However, since the inhibitors target BRD4 ubiquitously, it is unclear whether this chromatin reader protein functions in cell type-specific manner to control pathological myocardial fibrosis. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms by which BRD4 stimulates the transcriptional program for cardiac fibrosis remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that BRD4 functions in a cell-autonomous and signal-responsive manner to control activation of cardiac fibroblasts, which are the major extracellular matrix-producing cells of the heart. METHODS AND RESULTS: RNA-sequencing, mass spectrometry, and cell-based assays employing primary adult rat ventricular fibroblasts demonstrated that BRD4 functions as an effector of TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β) signaling to stimulate conversion of quiescent cardiac fibroblasts into Periostin (Postn)-positive cells that express high levels of extracellular matrix. These findings were confirmed in vivo through whole-transcriptome analysis of cardiac fibroblasts from mice subjected to transverse aortic constriction and treated with the small molecule BRD4 inhibitor, JQ1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing revealed that BRD4 undergoes stimulus-dependent, genome-wide redistribution in cardiac fibroblasts, becoming enriched on a subset of enhancers and super-enhancers, and leading to RNA polymerase II activation and expression of downstream target genes. Employing the Sertad4 (SERTA domain-containing protein 4) locus as a prototype, we demonstrate that dynamic chromatin targeting of BRD4 is controlled, in part, by p38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and provide evidence of a critical function for Sertad4 in TGF-β-mediated cardiac fibroblast activation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings define BRD4 as a central regulator of the pro-fibrotic cardiac fibroblast phenotype, establish a p38-dependent signaling circuit for epigenetic reprogramming in heart failure, and uncover a novel role for Sertad4. The work provides a mechanistic foundation for the development of BRD4 inhibitors as targeted anti-fibrotic therapies for the heart.
RATIONALE: Small molecule inhibitors of the acetyl-histone binding protein BRD4 have been shown to block cardiac fibrosis in preclinical models of heart failure (HF). However, since the inhibitors target BRD4 ubiquitously, it is unclear whether this chromatin reader protein functions in cell type-specific manner to control pathological myocardial fibrosis. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms by which BRD4 stimulates the transcriptional program for cardiac fibrosis remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that BRD4 functions in a cell-autonomous and signal-responsive manner to control activation of cardiac fibroblasts, which are the major extracellular matrix-producing cells of the heart. METHODS AND RESULTS: RNA-sequencing, mass spectrometry, and cell-based assays employing primary adult rat ventricular fibroblasts demonstrated that BRD4 functions as an effector of TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β) signaling to stimulate conversion of quiescent cardiac fibroblasts into Periostin (Postn)-positive cells that express high levels of extracellular matrix. These findings were confirmed in vivo through whole-transcriptome analysis of cardiac fibroblasts from mice subjected to transverse aortic constriction and treated with the small molecule BRD4 inhibitor, JQ1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing revealed that BRD4 undergoes stimulus-dependent, genome-wide redistribution in cardiac fibroblasts, becoming enriched on a subset of enhancers and super-enhancers, and leading to RNA polymerase II activation and expression of downstream target genes. Employing the Sertad4 (SERTA domain-containing protein 4) locus as a prototype, we demonstrate that dynamic chromatin targeting of BRD4 is controlled, in part, by p38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) and provide evidence of a critical function for Sertad4 in TGF-β-mediated cardiac fibroblast activation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings define BRD4 as a central regulator of the pro-fibrotic cardiac fibroblast phenotype, establish a p38-dependent signaling circuit for epigenetic reprogramming in heart failure, and uncover a novel role for Sertad4. The work provides a mechanistic foundation for the development of BRD4 inhibitors as targeted anti-fibrotic therapies for the heart.
Entities:
Keywords:
chromatin; fibroblast; heart failure; mass spectrometry; phenotype; signaling
Authors: Bjoern Chapuy; Michael R McKeown; Charles Y Lin; Stefano Monti; Margaretha G M Roemer; Jun Qi; Peter B Rahl; Heather H Sun; Kelly T Yeda; John G Doench; Elaine Reichert; Andrew L Kung; Scott J Rodig; Richard A Young; Margaret A Shipp; James E Bradner Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Priti Anand; Jonathan D Brown; Charles Y Lin; Jun Qi; Rongli Zhang; Pedro Calderon Artero; M Amer Alaiti; Jace Bullard; Kareem Alazem; Kenneth B Margulies; Thomas P Cappola; Madeleine Lemieux; Jorge Plutzky; James E Bradner; Saptarsi M Haldar Journal: Cell Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Panagis Filippakopoulos; Jun Qi; Sarah Picaud; Yao Shen; William B Smith; Oleg Fedorov; Elizabeth M Morse; Tracey Keates; Tyler T Hickman; Ildiko Felletar; Martin Philpott; Shonagh Munro; Michael R McKeown; Yuchuan Wang; Amanda L Christie; Nathan West; Michael J Cameron; Brian Schwartz; Tom D Heightman; Nicholas La Thangue; Christopher A French; Olaf Wiest; Andrew L Kung; Stefan Knapp; James E Bradner Journal: Nature Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Andrew Antolic; Hiroko Wakimoto; Zhe Jiao; Joshua M Gorham; Steven R DePalma; Madeleine E Lemieux; David A Conner; Da Young Lee; Jun Qi; Jonathan G Seidman; James E Bradner; Jonathan D Brown; Saptarsi M Haldar; Christine E Seidman; Michael A Burke Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-08-06
Authors: Ryan D Martin; Yalin Sun; Sarah MacKinnon; Luca Cuccia; Viviane Pagé; Terence E Hébert; Jason C Tanny Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Chukwuemeka G Anene-Nzelu; Mick C J Lee; Wilson L W Tan; Albert Dashi; Roger S Y Foo Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Joshua G Travers; Sara A Wennersten; Brisa Peña; Rushita A Bagchi; Harrison E Smith; Rachel A Hirsch; Lauren A Vanderlinden; Ying-Hsi Lin; Evgenia Dobrinskikh; Kimberly M Demos-Davies; Maria A Cavasin; Luisa Mestroni; Christian Steinkühler; Charles Y Lin; Steven R Houser; Kathleen C Woulfe; Maggie P Y Lam; Timothy A McKinsey Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 29.690