Literature DB >> 31407433

Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention.

Dimitris N Tatakis1, Hua-Hong Chien1, Andreas O Parashis1,2.   

Abstract

Ideal implant placement may reduce surgical complications, such as nerve injury and lingual cortical plate perforation, and minimize the likelihood of functional and prosthetic compromises. Guided implant surgery (GIS) has been used as the means to achieve ideal implant placement. GIS refers to the process of digital planning, custom-guide fabrication, and implant placement using the custom guide and an implant system-specific guided surgery kit. GIS includes numerous additional steps beyond the initial prosthetic diagnosis, treatment planning, and fabrication of surgical guide. Substantial errors can occur at each of these individual steps and can accumulate, significantly impacting the final accuracy of the process with potentially disastrous deviations from proper implant placement. Pertinent overall strategies to reduce or eliminate these risks can be summarized as follows: complete understanding of the possible risks is fundamental; knowledge of the systems and tools used is essential; consistent verification of both diagnostic and surgical procedures after each step is crucial; proper training and surgical experience are critical. This review article summarizes information on the accuracy and efficacy of GIS, provides insight on the potential risks and problems associated with each procedural step, and offers clinically relevant recommendations to minimize or eliminate these risks.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31407433     DOI: 10.1111/prd.12292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Periodontol 2000        ISSN: 0906-6713            Impact factor:   7.589


  10 in total

1.  [Research advances in the use of digital surgical guides in implantology].

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Wang; Ai-Peng Liu; Wen-Zheng Deng
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Evaluation of different registration methods and dental restorations on the registration duration and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral scans: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Xing-Yu Piao; Ji-Man Park; Hannah Kim; Youngjun Kim; June-Sung Shim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin; Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin; Mohd Ifwat Mohd Ghazali
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25

4.  Analog-digital hybrid impression technique in an elderly patient: A case report.

Authors:  Efstratios Papazoglou; Constantinos Charalambous
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Multivariate analysis of causal factors influencing accuracy of guided implant surgery for partial edentulism: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsumura; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Akihiro Kaminaka; Hirofumi Yatani; Daijiro Kabata
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Junggon Lee; Hyo-Jung Lee; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Comparing digital and traditional guides in first molar implant surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Yajie Yang; Chen Hu; Yanli Zhang; Linlin Wang; Longquan Shao; Jie You
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.205

8.  Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Arndt Guentsch; Hongseok An; Andrew R Dentino
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.021

9.  Case report: Fabrication of a dental implant guide based on tetrahedron positioning technology.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Zhenxiang Lin; Zhiqiang Zheng
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Digital vs. Freehand Anterior Single-Tooth Implant Restoration.

Authors:  D Baldi; J Colombo; F Motta; F M Motta; A Zillio; N Scotti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.