| Literature DB >> 31407085 |
Marc Timothy Eastin1, Vikram Badhri Chakravarthy2, Fransua Sharafeddin3, Daniel Hoss4, Miguel Angel Lopez-Gonzalez5.
Abstract
Cerebral revascularization was pioneered half a century ago. Gradual improvements in microsurgical instrumentation and training in microsurgical techniques have allowed significant changes that improved outcomes in neurosurgery, extrapolating this knowledge to other neurosurgical diseases (brain tumor, aneurysms, and skull base tumor surgery). But the popularity of cerebral bypass procedures was followed by their decline, given the lack of clear benefit of bypass surgery in chronic cerebrovascular ischemia after the EC-IC bypass studies. Over the last couple of decades, the formidable advance of neuro-endovascular techniques for revascularization has lessened the need for application of open cerebral revascularization procedures, either for flow augmentation or flow replacement. However, there is still a select group of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia, for whom open cerebral revascularization with flow augmentation is the only treatment option available, and this will be the objective of our current review.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral bypass; Cerebral ischemia; Flow augmentation; Flow replacement; Microsurgery; Revascularization; Vertebrobasilar insufficiency
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31407085 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04615-6_31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neurochir Suppl ISSN: 0065-1419