Alexandra Laurent1, Jean Reignier2,3, Amélie Le Gouge4,5, Alice Cottereau6, Mélanie Adda7, Djillali Annane8,9, Juliette Audibert10, François Barbier11, Patrick Bardou12, Simon Bourcier13,14, Jeremy Bourenne15, Alexandre Boyer16,17, François Brenas18, Vincent Das6, Arnaud Desachy19, Jérôme Devaquet20, Marc Feissel21, Frédérique Ganster22, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas23,24,25, Guillaume Grillet26, Olivier Guisset16,27, Rebecca Hamidfar-Roy28,29, Anne-Claire Hyacinthe30, Sebastien Jochmans31, Mercé Jourdain32, Alexandre Lautrette33,34, Nicolas Lerolle35,36, Olivier Lesieur37, Fabien Lion38, Philippe Mateu39, Bruno Megarbane40,41, Sybille Merceron40,42, Emmanuelle Mercier43,44,45, Jonathan Messika46, Paul Morin-Longuet47, Bénédicte Philippon-Jouve48, Jean-Pierre Quenot49, Anne Renault50,51, Xavier Repesse52, Jean-Philippe Rigaud53, Ségolène Robin13,54,55, Antoine Roquilly2,56, Amélie Seguin2,3, Didier Thevenin57, Patrice Tirot58, Isabelle Vinatier59, Elie Azoulay40,42, René Robert60,61,62, Nancy Kentish-Barnes63. 1. Laboratoire Psy-DREPI, EA7458, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France. 2. Université de Nantes, Nantes, France. 3. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France. 4. Inserm CIC 1415, Tours, France. 5. CHU Tours, Tours, France. 6. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHI André Grégoire, Montreuil, France. 7. Hôpital Nord, Réanimation des Détresses Respiratoires et Infections Sévères, Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, URMITE, UMR CNRS 7278, Marseille, France. 8. Inserm U 1173, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Versailles, France. 9. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France. 10. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Chartres, Chartres, France. 11. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHR d'Orléans, Orléans, France. 12. Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, CH de Montauban, Montauban, France. 13. Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France. 14. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, CHU Cochin, Paris, France. 15. Hôpital La Timone, Réanimation et Surveillance Continue, Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, Marseille, France. 16. Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 17. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 18. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH Emile Roux, Le Puy En Velay, France. 19. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH d'Angoulême, Angoulême, France. 20. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France. 21. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Belfort-Montbéliard, Belfort, France. 22. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France. 23. Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France. 24. Groupe de Recherche Outcomerea, Paris, France. 25. Département de Biostatistiques-HUPNVS-AP-HP, UFR de Médecine-Bichat, IAME, UMR 1137, INSERM Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. 26. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France. 27. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France. 28. Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France. 29. Clinique de la Réanimation Médicale, CHU Albert Michallon, Grenoble, France. 30. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, Pringy, France. 31. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CH Marc Jacquet, Melun, France. 32. Service de Réanimation, Université de Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, U1190, Lille, France. 33. Université de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 34. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 35. Université d'Angers, Angers, France. 36. Département de Réanimation Médicale et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU Angers, Angers, France. 37. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France. 38. Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris Villejuif, France. 39. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Charleville-Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France. 40. Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. 41. Assistance-Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Service de Réanimation Médicale et Toxicologique, CHU Lariboisière, Paris, France. 42. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Groupe de Recherche Famiréa, Hôpital Saint-Louis, CHU Saint-Louis, Medical ICU, Paris, France. 43. Université de Tours, Tours, France. 44. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU de Tours, Tours, France. 45. Réseau CRICS, Tours, France. 46. Service de Réanimation Médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier, AP-HP, IAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes, France. 47. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH Saint Nazaire, Saint Nazaire, France. 48. Service de Réanimation Médico-chirurgicale, CH de Roanne, Roanne, France. 49. Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France. 50. Equipe de Recherche EPS «Ethique, Professionnalisme et Santé», EA 686, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France. 51. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France. 52. Assistance Publique-hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. 53. Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, CH de Dieppe, Dieppe, France. 54. Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. 55. Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Paris, France. 56. Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France. 57. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Lens, Lens, France. 58. Service de Réanimation Médico-chirurgicale, CH du Mans, Le Mans, France. 59. Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHD de la Vendée, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France. 60. Inserm CIC 1402, Axe Alive, Poitiers, France. 61. Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. 62. Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France. 63. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Groupe de Recherche Famiréa, Hôpital Saint-Louis, CHU Saint-Louis, Medical ICU, Paris, France. nancy.kentish@aphp.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bereavement research has helped to improve end-of-life practices in the ICU. However, few studies have explored bereaved relatives experience of research participation in this context. We aimed to explore the experience of bereaved relatives' participation in the ARREVE study which included three telephone follow-up calls to complete several quantitative tools. METHODS: Volunteer relatives who participated in the 12-month follow-up call completed a questionnaire about research participation that included ten open-ended questions so that respondents could use their own words and thoughts. These open-ended questions were analyzed using qualitative analysis that examines themes within the data. RESULTS: 175/311 relatives completed the questionnaire. Three themes were derived from the thematic analysis: (1) struggling: reactivation of emotional distress associated with the ICU experience and the loss is frequent, specifically during the 1st follow-up call. (2) Resilience: as time goes by, research participation becomes increasingly positive. The calls are a help both in giving meaning to the relatives' experience and in accepting the loss. (3) Recognition: research calls can compensate for the absence of support during bereavement. CONCLUSION: Although some emotional difficulties must be acknowledged, bereavement research is overall associated with benefits, by facilitating emotional adjustments, meaning-making and resilience. Lack of support and social isolation during bereavement are frequent experiences, revealing that support strategies for bereaved relatives should be developed after the loss of a loved one in the ICU.
PURPOSE: Bereavement research has helped to improve end-of-life practices in the ICU. However, few studies have explored bereaved relatives experience of research participation in this context. We aimed to explore the experience of bereaved relatives' participation in the ARREVE study which included three telephone follow-up calls to complete several quantitative tools. METHODS: Volunteer relatives who participated in the 12-month follow-up call completed a questionnaire about research participation that included ten open-ended questions so that respondents could use their own words and thoughts. These open-ended questions were analyzed using qualitative analysis that examines themes within the data. RESULTS: 175/311 relatives completed the questionnaire. Three themes were derived from the thematic analysis: (1) struggling: reactivation of emotional distress associated with the ICU experience and the loss is frequent, specifically during the 1st follow-up call. (2) Resilience: as time goes by, research participation becomes increasingly positive. The calls are a help both in giving meaning to the relatives' experience and in accepting the loss. (3) Recognition: research calls can compensate for the absence of support during bereavement. CONCLUSION: Although some emotional difficulties must be acknowledged, bereavement research is overall associated with benefits, by facilitating emotional adjustments, meaning-making and resilience. Lack of support and social isolation during bereavement are frequent experiences, revealing that support strategies for bereaved relatives should be developed after the loss of a loved one in the ICU.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bereavement research; End-of-life; Family experience; Qualitative study
Authors: Judith E Nelson; Kathleen A Puntillo; Peter J Pronovost; Amy S Walker; Jennifer L McAdam; Debra Ilaoa; Joan Penrod Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Shannon S Carson; Christopher E Cox; Sylvan Wallenstein; Laura C Hanson; Marion Danis; James A Tulsky; Emily Chai; Judith E Nelson Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Karen Kavanaugh; Robert A Berg; David L Wessel; Christopher J L Newth; Thomas P Shanley; Rick Harrison; Heidi Dalton; J Michael Dean; Allan Doctor; Tammara Jenkins; Crystal L Park Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.267