| Literature DB >> 31406512 |
Mani Mofidi1, Nahid Kianmehr2, Yaser Foroghi Qomi3, Sonia N Zaim1, Peyman Hafezi Moghadam1, Mahdi Rezai1, Davood Farsi1, Saeed Abbasi1, Babak Mahshidfar1.
Abstract
Iran is among the countries which change official time, every year according to their constitutions. Studies have shown an increase of incidence ratio (IR) of acute myocardial infarction by these time transitions. Despite annual time changes in Iran, there is no published data to prove this among the Iranian. This retrospective study examined the IR of patients with AMI, who were admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of 5 teaching hospitals during the week just after the time transitions (observed period), with two weeks before and after the time transitions (expected period), both in spring and fall. In total, 11051 patients were admitted during the ten weeks (observed and expected), in both spring and fall time transitions. The IR of AMI during both observed and expected period did not show any significant difference (p > 0.05); however, the incidence of AMI was increased during the first week after the transition in spring (p > 0.05). Although the results of the present study did not prove the relation between time transitions and incidence of AMI, a slight increase existed for IR of AMI during three days after spring shift. This increase in IR of AMI can be due to Nowrooz, the national holidays which lasts four days after turning clocks forward in Iran.Entities:
Keywords: Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI); Daylight Saving Time (DST); circadian misalignment; circadian rhythm; sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31406512 PMCID: PMC6685301 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2017-0058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Life ISSN: 1844-122X
Baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients in two groups
| Age (mean, 95%CI)) | Gender (male) | History of ACS | Previous PCI or CABG | History of Cardiac Medication | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | 51.7 (47.8–56.2) | 24 (77.4%) | 10 (41.6%) | 2 (8.3%) | 12 (50%) | |
| Not MI | 42.1 (33.9–50.8) | 1578 (67.2%) | 593 (25.1%) | 95 (4.02%) | 715 (30.28%) | |
| MI | 53.1 (49.2–56.4) | 79 (71.71) | 49 (44.14%) | 10 (9%) | 55 (49.54%) | |
| Not MI | 39.4 (30.8–44.5) | 5616 (65.7%) | 2308 (27%) | 261 (3.05%) | 2111 (24.69%) |
MI=Myocardial Infarction, CI=Confidence Interval, ACS=Acute Coronary Syndrome, PCI=Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, CABG=Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Incidence Ratios (IRs) of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during spring
| Spring | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st day | 2nd day | 3rd day | 4th day | 5th day | 6th day | 7th day | |
| 0.889 | 0.844 | 1.25 | 1.209 | 1.304 | 1.395 | 0.477 | |
| 0.883–0.894 | 0.838–0.849 | 1.241–1.258 | 1.201–1.217 | 1.292–1.315 | 1.381–1.408 | 0.465–0.465 |
Incidence Ratios (IRs) of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during fall
| Fall | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st day | 2nd day | 3rd day | 4th day | 5th day | 6th day | 7th day | |
| 0.823 | 1.385 | 1.266 | 1.119 | 1.04 | 0.71 | 1.652 | |
| 0.814–0.831 | 1.368–1.402 | 1.252–1.28 | 1.106–1.131 | 1.026–1.054 | 0.689–0.721 | 1.632–1.672 |
Figure 1:IRs of AMI in spring shift
Figure 2:IRs of AMI in fall shift