Literature DB >> 31405968

Competing national memories of World War II.

Henry L Roediger1, Magdalena Abel2, Sharda Umanath3, Ruth A Shaffer4, Beth Fairfield5, Masanobu Takahashi6, James V Wertsch7.   

Abstract

We assessed the knowledge of 1,338 people from 11 countries (8 former Allied and 3 former Axis) about World War II. When asked what percentage their country contributed to the war effort, across Allied countries, estimates totaled 309%, and Axis nations' estimates came to 140%. People in 4 nations claimed more than 50% responsibility for their country (Germany, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States). The overclaiming of responsibility reflected in these percentages was moderated when subjects were asked to consider the contributions of other countries; however, Russians continued to claim great responsibility, the only country that remained well over 50% in its claim of responsibility for the Allied victory. If deaths in the war are considered a proxy of a nation's contributions, the Soviet Union did carry much of the burden. This study points to sharp differences in national memory even across nations who fought on the same side in the war. Differing national perspectives shape diverse memories of the same complex event.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective memory; ethnocentrism; national memory; national narcissism; public event memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31405968      PMCID: PMC6708356          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907992116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

Review 1.  How the past weighs on the present: social representations of history and their role in identity politics.

Authors:  James H Liu; Denis J Hilton
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  Collective memory: conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches.

Authors:  James V Wertsch; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-04

3.  Collective Narcissism: Americans Exaggerate the Role of Their Home State in Appraising U.S. History.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Morgan Q Ross; Laura K Soter; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18

Review 4.  Bias and ignorance in demographic perception.

Authors:  D Landy; B Guay; T Marghetis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

Review 5.  Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective.

Authors:  William Hirst; Jeremy K Yamashiro; Alin Coman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Moralized memory: binding values predict inflated estimates of the group's historical influence.

Authors:  Luke Churchill; Jeremy K Yamashiro; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2019-05-30

7.  Collective narcissism and its social consequences.

Authors:  Agnieszka Golec de Zavala; Aleksandra Cichocka; Roy Eidelson; Nuwan Jayawickreme
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-12

8.  Collective memories of three wars in United States history in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Franklin Zaromb; Andrew C Butler; Pooja K Agarwal; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  QnAs with Henry L. Roediger III.

Authors:  Melissa Suran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Maradona in our minds: The FIFA World Cup as a way to address collective memory properties.

Authors:  Luz Bavassi; Laura Kaczer; Rodrigo S Fernández
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

3.  Postmortem memory of public figures in news and social media.

Authors:  Robert West; Jure Leskovec; Christopher Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.