Literature DB >> 31405893

Effect of user puffing topography on total particulate matter, nicotine and volatile carbonyl emissions from narghile waterpipes.

Nathan C Eddingsaas1, Edward C Hensel2, Sean O'Dea3, Peyton Kunselman3, A Gary DiFrancesco2, Risa J Robinson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Puffing topographies of waterpipe users vary widely as does the puff-to-puff topography of an individual user. The aim of this study was to determine if puff duration and flow rate have an effect on the characteristics of the mainstream emission from waterpipes, including total particulate matter (TPM), mass ratio of nicotine and mass concentration of volatile carbonyls.
METHODS: Puffing parameters were chosen to encompass a significant portion of the perimeter space observed from a natural environment study. Tested conditions were 150, 200 and 250 mL sec-1; each run at 2, 3.5 and 5 s durations; 25 s interpuff duration and ~100 puffs per session. Each session was run in quadruplicate using the Programmable Emissions System-2 (PES-2) emissions capture system under identical conditions. Particulate matter, for quantification of TPM and nicotine, was collected on filter pads every ~5 L of aerosol resulting in 6 to 25 samples per session. Volatile carbonyls were sampled using 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH)-coated silica.
RESULTS: Mass concentration of TPM linearly decreased with increased flow rate, with no dependency on puff duration. Nicotine mass ratio was independent of topography, with average mass ratio of nicotine to TPM of 0.0027±0.0002 (mg/mg). The main carbonyls observed were acetaldehyde and formaldehyde. Puff duration increased emissions of some carbonyls (eg, formaldehyde) but not others (eg, acetaldehyde).
CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here highlight that topographies influence the emissions generated from waterpipes including TPM, total nicotine and volatile carbonyls. For laboratory studies to be representative of user exposure, a range of topographies must be studied. Using a range of topographies within a controlled laboratory environment will better inform regulatory policy. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nicotine; non-cigarette tobacco products; smoking topography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31405893     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  3 in total

1.  A Proposed Waterpipe Emissions Topography Protocol Reflecting Natural Environment User Behaviour.

Authors:  Edward C Hensel; Samantha Emma Sarles; Abdulaziz Al-Olayan; A Gary DiFrancesco; Shehan Jayasekera; Nathan C Eddingsaas; Risa J Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Exhalation of alternative tobacco product aerosols differs from cigarette smoke-and may lead to alternative health risks.

Authors:  Emma Karey; Taylor Reed; Maria Katsigeorgis; Kayla Farrell; Jade Hess; Grace Gibbon; Michael Weitzman; Terry Gordon
Journal:  Tob Use Insights       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Puffing topography and physiological responses in men and women with low versus high waterpipe dependence during smoking: The WiHi Irbid project.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Alomari; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.852

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.