Laura Sanchis1, Xavier Freixa2, Ander Regueiro2, Juan Manuel Perdomo3, Manel Sabaté2, Marta Sitges4. 1. Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: lsanchis@clinic.cat. 2. Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. 3. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Anestesiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent randomized trials of the MitraClip system have reported controversial results in the treatment of patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and impact of MitraClip implantation on outcomes in FMR according to left ventricular (LV) status. METHODS: Patients with FMR undergoing MitraClip implantation in our center were retrospectively screened and divided into 2 groups according to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-diastolic dimension: "very poor LV" (LVEF ≤ 20% and/or LV end-diastolic dimension ≥ 70 mm) and "poor LV" (LVEF> 20% and LV end-diastolic dimension <70 mm). Survival analysis of cardiovascular outcomes included hospital admission due to congestive heart failure, heart transplant, and cardiovascular death. Likewise, we compared the number of hospital admissions and functional class the year before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with FMR were included (28 with very poor LV and 30 with poor LV). The mean follow-up was 19.5± 13 months. Patients with poor LV showed a significantly better event-free survival for cardiovascular events (log-rank 3.706, P=.010). One year after the intervention, both groups showed symptom improvement. Most of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I-II (100% poor LV and 84% very poor LV) and both groups showed a decrease in the number of hospital admissions due to congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip implantation seems to be safe and effective in reducing FMR. Although patients with very low LVEF and/or very enlarged LV seemed to have worse cardiovascular outcomes, the intervention was safe and resulted in symptom improvement.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent randomized trials of the MitraClip system have reported controversial results in the treatment of patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and impact of MitraClip implantation on outcomes in FMR according to left ventricular (LV) status. METHODS:Patients with FMR undergoing MitraClip implantation in our center were retrospectively screened and divided into 2 groups according to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV end-diastolic dimension: "very poor LV" (LVEF ≤ 20% and/or LV end-diastolic dimension ≥ 70 mm) and "poor LV" (LVEF> 20% and LV end-diastolic dimension <70 mm). Survival analysis of cardiovascular outcomes included hospital admission due to congestive heart failure, heart transplant, and cardiovascular death. Likewise, we compared the number of hospital admissions and functional class the year before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with FMR were included (28 with very poor LV and 30 with poor LV). The mean follow-up was 19.5± 13 months. Patients with poor LV showed a significantly better event-free survival for cardiovascular events (log-rank 3.706, P=.010). One year after the intervention, both groups showed symptom improvement. Most of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I-II (100% poor LV and 84% very poor LV) and both groups showed a decrease in the number of hospital admissions due to congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip implantation seems to be safe and effective in reducing FMR. Although patients with very low LVEF and/or very enlarged LV seemed to have worse cardiovascular outcomes, the intervention was safe and resulted in symptom improvement.
Authors: Isaac Pascual; Tomás Benito-González; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro; Rebeca Lorca; Carmen Garrote-Coloma; Pablo Avanzas; Javier Gualis; Antonio Adeba; Armando Pérez de Prado; César Morís; Felipe Fernández-Vázquez Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2020-08