Literature DB >> 31405526

Females and males use different hip and knee mechanics in response to symmetric military-relevant loads.

Kari L Loverro1, Leif Hasselquist2, Cara L Lewis3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if females and males use different hip and knee mechanics when walking with standardized military-relevant symmetric loads. Fifteen females and fifteen males walked on a treadmill for 2-min at a constant speed under three symmetric load conditions (unloaded: 1.71 kg, medium: 15 kg, heavy: 26 kg). Kinematic and kinetics of the hip and knee were calculated in the sagittal and frontal planes of the dominant limb. In females, hip abduction moments (normalized to total mass) and sagittal knee excursion decreased with increased load (p ≤ 0.024). In males, hip frontal excursion and adduction angle increased with load (p ≤ 0.003). Females had greater peak hip adduction angle than males in the unloaded and medium load conditions (p ≤ 0.036). Across sex, sagittal hip and knee excursion, peak knee extension angle, and peak hip and knee flexion angles increased with increased load (p ≤ 0.005). When normalized to body mass, all peak joint moments increased with each load (p ≤ 0.016) except peak hip adduction moment. When normalized to total mass, peak hip adduction moment and knee flexion, extension, and adduction moments decreased with each load (p < 0.001). While hip frontal plane kinetic alterations to load were only noted in females, kinematic changes were noted in males at the hip and females at the knee. Differences in strategies may increase the risk of hip and knee injuries in females compared to males. This study noted load and sex effects that were previously undetected, highlighting the importance of using military-relevant standardized loads and investigating frontal plane adaptations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female Soldiers; Gait; Hip and knee mechanics; Load carriage; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31405526     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Load Magnitude and Locomotion Pattern Alter Locomotor System Function in Healthy Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Kellen T Krajewski; Dennis E Dever; Camille C Johnson; Qi Mi; Richard J Simpson; Scott M Graham; Gavin L Moir; Nizam U Ahamed; Shawn D Flanagan; William J Anderst; Chris Connaboy
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-09-16

2.  Analysis of 3-D Kinematics Using H-Gait System during Walking on a Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kataoka; Ryo Takeda; Shigeru Tadano; Tomoya Ishida; Yuki Saito; Satoshi Osuka; Mina Samukawa; Harukazu Tohyama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Considerations for Sex-Cognizant Research in Exercise Biology and Medicine.

Authors:  Samia M O'Bryan; Kathleen R Connor; Devin J Drummer; Kaleen M Lavin; Marcas M Bamman
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  6DOF knee kinematic alterations due to increased load levels.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Yaxiang Huang; Guoqing Zhong; Lingchuang Kong; Yuan Yan; Huahao Lai; Xiaolong Zeng; Wenhan Huang; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  Effects of prolonged walking with body borne load on knee adduction biomechanics.

Authors:  Micah D Drew; Samantha M Krammer; Tyler N Brown
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Effects of body size and load carriage on lower-extremity biomechanical responses in healthy women.

Authors:  Ginu Unnikrishnan; Chun Xu; Michael Baggaley; Junfei Tong; Sahil Kulkarni; W Brent Edwards; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.