Literature DB >> 31405416

Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury.

Joshua Parreco, Hahn Soe-Lin, Jonathan J Parks, Saskya Byerly, Matthew Chatoor, Jessica L Buicko, Nicholas Namias, Rishi Rattan.   

Abstract

Prior studies have used vital signs and laboratory measurements with conventional modeling techniques to predict acute kidney injury (AKI). The purpose of this study was to use the trend in vital signs and laboratory measurements with machine learning algorithms for predicting AKI in ICU patients. The eICU Collaborative Research Database was queried for five consecutive days of laboratory measurements per patient. Patients with AKI were identified and trends in vital signs and laboratory values were determined by calculating the slope of the least-squares-fit linear equation using three days for each value. Different machine learning classifiers (gradient boosted trees [GBT], logistic regression, and deep learning) were trained to predict AKI using the laboratory values, vital signs, and slopes. There were 151,098 ICU stays identified and the rate of AKI was 5.6 per cent. The best performing algorithm was GBT with an AUC of 0.834 ± 0.006 and an F-measure of 42.96 per cent ± 1.26 per cent. Logistic regression performed with an AUC of 0.827 ± 0.004 and an F-measure of 28.29 per cent ± 1.01 per cent. Deep learning performed with an AUC of 0.817 ± 0.005 and an F-measure of 42.89 per cent ± 0.91 per cent. The most important variable for GBT was the slope of the minimum creatinine (30.32%). This study identifies the best performing machine learning algorithms for predicting AKI using trends in laboratory values in ICU patients. Early identification of these patients using readily available data indicates that incorporating machine learning predictive models into electronic medical record systems is an inevitable requisite for improving patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31405416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Development and validation of clinical prediction models for acute kidney injury recovery at hospital discharge in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Chao-Yuan Huang; Fabian Güiza; Greet De Vlieger; Pieter Wouters; Jan Gunst; Michael Casaer; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Inge Derese; Greet Van den Berghe; Geert Meyfroidt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Prognostic Value of Serum Albumin Level in Critically Ill Patients: Observational Data From Large Intensive Care Unit Databases.

Authors:  Xuting Jin; Jiamei Li; Lu Sun; Jingjing Zhang; Ya Gao; Ruohan Li; Jiajia Ren; Yanli Hou; Dan Su; Jiao Liu; Xiaochuang Wang; Dechang Chen; Gang Wang; Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Acute Kidney Injury Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Joana Gameiro; Tiago Branco; José António Lopes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Prediction Models for AKI in ICU: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Qing Qian; Jinming Wu; Jiayang Wang; Haixia Sun; Lei Yang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  High-Normal Serum Magnesium and Hypermagnesemia Are Associated With Increased 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Liao Tan; Qian Xu; Chan Li; Jie Liu; Ruizheng Shi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  Predicting mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using XGBoost model.

Authors:  Jialin Liu; Jinfa Wu; Siru Liu; Mengdie Li; Kunchang Hu; Ke Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Does Artificial Intelligence Make Clinical Decision Better? A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Kidney Injury Prediction.

Authors:  Tao Han Lee; Jia-Jin Chen; Chi-Tung Cheng; Chih-Hsiang Chang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.