Guixin Shen1, Jing Wang1, Faming Fei2, Minhang Mao3, Zubing Mei4. 1. Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China. 2. Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China. Electronic address: jing_wang9010@126.com. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China. Electronic address: zacharymao@163.com. 4. Department of Anorectal Surgery, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China; Anorectal Disease Institute of Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai, 201203, China. Electronic address: herrmayor@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bedside ultrasonography is a promising tool for identification of acute appendicitis. We assessed the accuracy and clinical value of bedside ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the emergency department. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 2018. The diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasonography was compared with that of surgery and/or CT scan, which was used as reference standard. Pooled summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) from each included study were estimated using bivariate logistic regression model. Inter-study heterogeneity was examined using I2 statistic. Meta-regression was performed to further investigate the source of heterogeneity. Deeks's funnel plot was used to test publication bias. RESULTS: Our search yielded 5394 citations, of which 27 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Bivariate analysis yielded a mean sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 82%-0.95%) and specificity of 95% (95% CI 89%-98%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98). There was significant inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 96%, 95% CI 94%-99%). Meta-regression analysis suggested that study region and patient sample size could attribute to the heterogeneity. Deeks's funnel plot did not indicate the existence of publication bias (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Bedside ultrasonography, a radiation-free and noninvasive modality, provides superior diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but its value in different abdominal emergencies warrants further development and research.
BACKGROUND: Bedside ultrasonography is a promising tool for identification of acute appendicitis. We assessed the accuracy and clinical value of bedside ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the emergency department. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 2018. The diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasonography was compared with that of surgery and/or CT scan, which was used as reference standard. Pooled summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) from each included study were estimated using bivariate logistic regression model. Inter-study heterogeneity was examined using I2 statistic. Meta-regression was performed to further investigate the source of heterogeneity. Deeks's funnel plot was used to test publication bias. RESULTS: Our search yielded 5394 citations, of which 27 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Bivariate analysis yielded a mean sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 82%-0.95%) and specificity of 95% (95% CI 89%-98%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98). There was significant inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 96%, 95% CI 94%-99%). Meta-regression analysis suggested that study region and patient sample size could attribute to the heterogeneity. Deeks's funnel plot did not indicate the existence of publication bias (P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Bedside ultrasonography, a radiation-free and noninvasive modality, provides superior diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but its value in different abdominal emergencies warrants further development and research.