Literature DB >> 31404051

Impact of mobile health (mHealth) interventions during the perinatal period for mothers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Justine Dol1,2,3, Brianna Richardson2,4, Gail Tomblin Murphy2,3,4, Megan Aston2,3,4, Douglas McMillan5, Marsha Campbell-Yeo2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this review was to determine the impact of mother-targeted mobile health (mHealth) educational interventions available during the perinatal period in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: There has been significant growth of mHealth projects in LMICs. The use of mHealth interventions across the perinatal period offers the ability to share information with mothers about essential newborn care and to encourage mothers to attend perinatal clinics to obtain additional in-person support as needed. The impact of perinatal mHealth educational interventions on maternal behavior change and early neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes in LMICs is unknown. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review considered studies that included mHealth educational interventions targeting mothers living in LMICs during the antenatal or postnatal period using mobile devices. The intervention must have been initiated during the antenatal period (conception through birth) through six weeks postnatally. All experimental study designs were included. Outcomes included maternal knowledge, maternal self-efficacy, antenatal/postnatal care attendance and newborn early morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase and CINAHL were searched on March 19, 2018 for studies published in English. The search was updated on June 7, 2018. Critical appraisal was undertaken by two independent reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Quantitative data were extracted from included studies independently by two reviewers using a standardized data extraction tool. All conflicts were resolved through consensus with a third reviewer. Quantitative data were, where possible, pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings were reported narratively.
RESULTS: A total of 1514 articles were screened, and 71 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility, with 23 articles critically appraised. Following appraisal, three articles were excluded due to poor quality. Of the 20 articles included, 16 were peer reviewed articles and four were gray literature reports. Eight papers targeted antenatal education, eight covered postnatal education and four covered both antenatal and postnatal education. Studies varied in terms of design, country, approach, frequency and content. Mothers who received an mHealth intervention attended a significantly greater number of antenatal care contacts (mean difference = 0.67, 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.99, P = 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to have at least one postnatal care contact between six and eight weeks (odds ratio = 1.36, 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.85, P = 0.05). Maternal knowledge, self-efficacy and neonatal mortality and morbidity were inconsistently reported across studies.
CONCLUSIONS: mHealth education interventions are associated with increased maternal contact antenatally and postnatally in LMICs. Due to heterogeneity of studies among country of implementation, approach, frequency and content of the mHealth interventions, the impact on other maternal and neonatal outcomes is inconclusive. Future work using mHealth to target maternal education during the perinatal period should focus on standardization of content and outcome evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31404051     DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep        ISSN: 2202-4433


  5 in total

1.  Participants' Perceptions of Essential Coaching for Every Mother-a Canadian Text Message-Based Postpartum Program: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Justine Dol; Megan Aston; Douglas McMillan; Gail Tomblin Murphy; Marsha Campbell-Yeo
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Mobile consulting as an option for delivering healthcare services in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Bronwyn Harris; Motunrayo Ajisola; Raisa Meher Alam; Jocelyn Anstey Watkins; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Pauline Bakibinga; Beatrice Chipwaza; Nazratun Nayeem Choudhury; Peter Kibe; Olufunke Fayehun; Akinyinka Omigbodun; Eme Owoaje; Senga Pemba; Rachel Potter; Narjis Rizvi; Jackie Sturt; Jonathan Cave; Romaina Iqbal; Caroline Kabaria; Albino Kalolo; Catherine Kyobutungi; Richard J Lilford; Titus Mashanya; Sylvester Ndegese; Omar Rahman; Saleem Sayani; Rita Yusuf; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-08-19

3.  Effects of mHealth on the psychosocial health of pregnant women and mothers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Lisa Sakamoto; Rogie Royce Carandang; Madhu Kharel; Akira Shibanuma; Ekaterina Yarotskaya; Milana Basargina; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Effects of mHealth Interventions on Improving Antenatal Care Visits and Skilled Delivery Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Md Obaidur Rahman; Noyuri Yamaji; Yasuko Nagamatsu; Erika Ota
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Can digitally enabling community health and nutrition workers improve services delivery to pregnant women and mothers of infants? Quasi-experimental evidence from a national-scale nutrition programme in India.

Authors:  Sumeet R Patil; Sneha Nimmagadda; Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan; Rasmi Avula; Sumati Bajaj; Nadia Diamond-Smith; Anshuman Paul; Lia Fernald; Purnima Menon; Dilys Walker
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.