BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been several reports of using an enhanced discharge pathway following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). No previous studies have prospectively examined patient satisfaction of patients with AIS using an enhanced discharge pathway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with an enhanced discharge pathway for PSF and whether patients felt that their length of stay was appropriate. METHODS: Patients with AIS undergoing PSF were prospectively enrolled. At their first postoperative clinic visit, patients were administered a survey regarding their experience. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients enrolled (mean age, 14 y), 1 was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2, 33 were discharged on POD 3, 9 were discharged on POD 4, and 3 were discharged on POD 5. Eighty (37/46) of patients felt that they were discharged at an appropriate time, whereas 20% (9/46) felt they were discharged too early. Patients who felt they were discharged at an appropriate time (mean, 3.2 d) had a trend toward shorter stays than those who felt they were discharged too early (mean, 3.7 d). Overall patient satisfaction of hospital stay was high with a mean of 9 on a 10-point scale (range, 1 to 10). There was no correlation between length of stay and patient satisfaction (P=0.723). Patients who felt they were discharged early had a significantly higher mean FACES pain scores than those who felt they were discharged about right both as inpatients (mean, 4.8 vs. 3.4; P=0.0319) and at their first postoperative clinic visit (5.4 vs. 2.9; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of patients with AIS who underwent PSF felt that the time of discharge was appropriate with an enhanced discharge pathway. There was no correlation between patient satisfaction and length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
BACKGROUND: Recently, there have been several reports of using an enhanced discharge pathway following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). No previous studies have prospectively examined patient satisfaction of patients with AIS using an enhanced discharge pathway. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with an enhanced discharge pathway for PSF and whether patients felt that their length of stay was appropriate. METHODS:Patients with AIS undergoing PSF were prospectively enrolled. At their first postoperative clinic visit, patients were administered a survey regarding their experience. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients enrolled (mean age, 14 y), 1 was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2, 33 were discharged on POD 3, 9 were discharged on POD 4, and 3 were discharged on POD 5. Eighty (37/46) of patients felt that they were discharged at an appropriate time, whereas 20% (9/46) felt they were discharged too early. Patients who felt they were discharged at an appropriate time (mean, 3.2 d) had a trend toward shorter stays than those who felt they were discharged too early (mean, 3.7 d). Overall patient satisfaction of hospital stay was high with a mean of 9 on a 10-point scale (range, 1 to 10). There was no correlation between length of stay and patient satisfaction (P=0.723). Patients who felt they were discharged early had a significantly higher mean FACES pain scores than those who felt they were discharged about right both as inpatients (mean, 4.8 vs. 3.4; P=0.0319) and at their first postoperative clinic visit (5.4 vs. 2.9; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of patients with AIS who underwent PSF felt that the time of discharge was appropriate with an enhanced discharge pathway. There was no correlation between patient satisfaction and length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Authors: Mark J Lambrechts; Melanie E Boeyer; Nicole M Tweedy; Sumit K Gupta; Eric T Kimchi; Daniel G Hoernschemeyer Journal: Mo Med Date: 2022 Mar-Apr