Literature DB >> 31403711

The safety and efficacy of open bedside tracheotomy: A retrospective analysis of 1000 patients.

David Z Liao1, Vikas Mehta2, Corin M Kinkhabwala1, Daniel Li1, Sarah Palsen1, Bradley A Schiff2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety/efficacy of performing open bedside tracheotomy (OBT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and identify predictive factors for outcomes.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. We identified 1000 consecutive patients undergoing OBT at a single university hospital starting from August 1, 2007. Complication rate, 30-day mortality, decannulation rate, time to surgery (TTS) from initial consult, and ICU length of stay were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of complication rate, 30-day mortality, and decannulation rate.
RESULTS: Mean TTS was 1.80 days. Major complication rate was 1%. No intraoperative deaths were caused by tracheotomy although two deaths resulted from late tracheotomy-related complications. Thirty-day mortality was 26.6%. The only significant predictor for overall complications was mild chronic hepatitis (OR = 2.355). Predictors for 30-day mortality included platelet count <50,000 (OR = 2.125) and vasopressor use (OR = 3.51). Each additional year of age was associated with decreased decannulation rate (OR = 0.972).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of starting an OBT program in a highly comorbid population without strict selection criteria. Safety of OBT was supported by minimal major complication rates and no intraoperative tracheotomy-related deaths in our cohort. These complication rates were comparable to, or lower than, published studies of open and percutaneous techniques. Predictive factors for decannulation, complication, and mortality were identified to help determine which patients would benefit from OBT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1263-1269, 2020.
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tracheotomy; complications; open bedside; safety; tracheostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31403711     DOI: 10.1002/lary.28234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  The surgical airway in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Monica C Azmy; Shravani Pathak; Bradley A Schiff
Journal:  Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Comparison of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy versus open surgical technique in severe COVID-19: Complication rates, relative risks and benefits.

Authors:  Cecilia Botti; Francesca Lusetti; Tommaso Neri; Stefano Peroni; Andrea Castellucci; Pierpaolo Salsi; Angelo Ghidini
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 3.  Is Surgical Tracheostomy Better Than Percutaneous Tracheostomy in COVID-19-Positive Patients?

Authors:  Massimiliano Bassi; Franco Ruberto; Camilla Poggi; Daniele Diso; Marco Anile; Tiziano De Giacomo; Ylenia Pecoraro; Carolina Carillo; Francesco Pugliese; Federico Venuta; Jacopo Vannucci
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.627

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.